The History of photography
Here is the website I created for my final project. It's about the history of photography!
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
todays bird

ellievsbear
noise dept.
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

gracie abrams
No title available
Color Me Curious
Doug Jones
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
Xuebing Du

Kiana Khansmith

oozey mess

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Fai_Ryy

titsay

Origami Around
Game of Thrones Daily
almost home
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from France
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Philippines

seen from France
seen from Türkiye

seen from Malaysia
seen from Mexico
seen from Colombia

seen from Türkiye

seen from India
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands

seen from United States
@mlindsey21-blog
The History of photography
Here is the website I created for my final project. It's about the history of photography!
Last Tumblr Post (YAY)
First of all, History on the Web has been really interesting all semester because it made me think about something that I use every day in a whole new way: from a historian’s perspective. I use the Internet and technology every day, whether it’s for school research purposes or just to crush some candies on Candy Crush. The aforementioned examples of how I use the Internet and technology go to show how vast the opportunities are; I could be productive all day by researching intellectual information, or play mindless games for pure enjoyment. The possibilities are endless, but it’s all about how you utilize the information available to you. What’s the point of digitizing everything if no one will use it or gain from it? There needs to be an audience, and as long as there is an audience then digitization will continue to grow.
After reading the chapter written by Thomas and Johnson, three things really sparked my thinking. First, the fact that people think that digitizing will make documents last forever, but that is simply not true. I too thought that digital records would be invincible, but as Thomas and Johnson point out that is not the case. Digital records are at risk of being lost forever if a system were to crash and lose all information within it. Furthermore, as technology continues to progress, old technologies will become obsolete. Therefore, as Thomas and Johnson mentioned, how will future generations access information on a CD-ROM if they do not have a system to run it? I never really thought about these issues before, but it shows just how fragile digital records truly are even though most of us think that digitizing records means that they are safe.
Secondly, Thomas and Johnson bring up the fact that paper products are not necessarily dying out, but rather evolving. One example of this that they use in the chapter is the evolution of books from paper products to electronic e-books that can be read on e-readers. In this digital age, many consumers want something easy and accessible. Thus, instead of going to the library to get books and having the daunting task of returning them on time, readers can download books in the convenience of their own home at the push of a button. Therefore, paper books may one day become obsolete, but books will live on through electronic devices. So it’s not that paper products are necessarily becoming extinct, it’s just that they are evolving with the ever changing technological advances.
Lastly, along with the evolution of products, the mediums are changing as well. In the past, if you wanted to talk to someone you generally had to write a letter and mail it, which could take days or weeks to reach the recipient. However, now there are many ways in which people can communicate. For example, the letter still exists, but the medium is different now: instead of mailing a piece of paper you can email an electronic letter using a computer or smartphone. The premise is still the same, but the medium in which you send the letter is different, not to mention faster and more convenient. The downfall of this, however, is that technology is resulting in loss of jobs, which is evident in the Canada Post industry because more emails equals less letters and less letters/mail equals loss in jobs for post workers.
Finally, Weller’s conclusion really made me think about one thing: the fact that the Internet and open access has given anyone the ability to learn and search information. Weller mentions how Thomas Carlyle suggested that “in a certain sense all men are historians”. I find this to be true because there is so much information on the Internet that makes it easier for anyone to conduct research and learn. I think that this may lead to an altered education system in the future because it seems silly to spend thousands of dollars on an education when people could gain just as much, if not more, knowledge on their own from the comfort of their home. Obviously, one cannot get a degree from sitting at home, but it goes to show how the elite hold control over the education system because anything we learn in a classroom can be learned from the Internet. It will be interesting to see where the Internet and technology will take us, because it has already impacted our lives so much and it will continue to do so for future generations.
Google seems to be reaching out of the internet and into every corner of the world. So what exactly does it want – and can it really be good for us?
Pretty interesting article about Google and and their secret research lab: Google X. They're working on many technologies including helium balloons to beam 3G internet access to remote parts of the world. Worth a read! Enjoy!
Hey y'all! Check out our awesome wiki page about the Black Donnellys!!
YAY me & question #14 :)
Research Question
It seems as though the Internet is making books obsolete, especially as digital archiving continues to grow. Do you think that the Internet will one day be obsolete as a new technology takes its place?
Digital Curation - October 29
Alex Poole writes that “‘The Digital Curation Center posits that “digital curation is about maintaining and adding value to a trusted body of digital information for current and future use’” (14) and “Digital curation ensures that research and readership in the humanities will be maximized” (6).
Discuss the importance of digital curation for history and historians, for digital humanities, and/or for education in the humanities.
I think that digital curation is very important for humanity in general; past generations did not have the technology that is available today and such technology should be maximized to its fullest capabilities. I think that in some way or another everybody digitally curates, whether it be organizing digital pictures or organizing music into playlists; everyone can benefit from digital curation.
Historians can benefit from digital curation in many ways. First, digital curation makes the barrier of access almost invisible. The digital world can be accessed from almost anywhere on the globe which aids historians’ research efforts. Barriers can still exist, but very minimally; perhaps the biggest barrier is having to pay a fee to gain open access, yet that barrier is easily moveable if one wants to pay the price. Second, digital curation organizes information in various ways that make searching for specific information that much easier. This is great for historians because it delivers quality results in a timely manner when conducting research. Historians no longer have to read through hundreds of documents in order to find what they’re searching for; rather, they can search a topic and read through specific documents that are relevant. Lastly, I think that future historians will continue to benefit from digital curation because it is still growing and has yet to reach its full potential. Almost everything that goes on in the world today is digitally documented. Curating all that digital information can help future historians when they begin to study the beginning of the 21st century. Imagine how many primary sources have been lost or destroyed throughout history, documents that could have helped present-day historians understand the past in different ways. I think that those days are coming to an end. Almost everything is digitally documented, it’s much more difficult to lose or destroy digital information. Thus, I believe that future historians will have a much better understanding of present-day society than we can ever have of past societies.
The Digital Humanities Manifesto
1. Explore the web to find and select what you think is a great digital history project. Include the link and briefly explain why you think it’s interesting, exciting, useful etc.
Here is the Link to a great digital history project that I found: http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/ It was the second link on google search so I’m apologizing in advance for the repeats you will certainly have to read through :). However, this website is absolutely amazing! The website highlights America’s history from “The First Americans” pre-1490 to 2012. The setup of the website is very user-friendly and easy to navigate through. The website is also very interactive: the homepage includes a timeline which users can use to select any time period of interest. Aside from being broken up into eras the timeline is also broken up into four categories: media, documents, textbook, and teaching. Therefore, one can choose a time period as well as one of the four categories. Furthermore, there are more categories to choose from once you click on an era: events, people, quizzes, for teachers, and more totalling thirteen categories. The timeline is beautifully done; the background of the grid includes images that represent important American history. The first image is the signing of the Unites States Declaration of Independence and the last image is the Twin Towers about to collapse; both very iconic in America’s history for very different reasons. The website states (in its credits) that it was designed to support the teaching of American history in primary and secondary schools, which I think it does beautifully.
2. How does your great digital history project connect with ideas described in the Digital Humanities Manifesto?
The Digital Humanities Manifesto is an interesting, fun read. The above digital history project connects with the ideas described in the manifesto in many ways. On page 6 it states that the Web revolution includes: “expanding the reach and impact of knowledge in the Humanities disciplines”. This connects with the above website because the intent of the contributors was to expand the reach and impact of American history for students and teachers, and just about everyone else. Furthermore, on page 7 it states that Wiki-nomics implies “a dedefinition of the roles of professor and student, expert and non‐expert, academic and community” which I think means that the abundance of information found on the Web (thus, on the above website) gives everybody the opportunity to conduct research and learn. Websites are commonly made accessible for and geared to the general public as oppose to only university professors or scholars. Lastly, the manifesto discusses the important of curation which I think is reflected in the above website because it is organized well and categorized is a user-friendly way.
3. What connections do you see between the Digital Humanities Manifesto, Willinsky, Tredinnick and/or Mussell?
There are many connections between the Digital Humanities Manifesto and John Willinsky’s article “Toward an Open, Public History: A Call to Historians of Education”. Willinsky’s article is all about the openness of the Internet and how historians can take advantage of the digital world. He also discusses the openness of the Internet to the general public as well as how accessible information is on the Web now. Both articles emphasize this: that historians need not be afraid of the digital age, but rather embrace and utilize the resources and information that it has to offer.
Some personal history while I'm at school missing my baby girl!! Three and a half years ago I became a mommy to the cutest little bean!! March 11, 2011 <3
Some hockey history... I saw this on twitter last night. As a die hard Leafs fan it makes me incredibly sad, and then it makes me laugh! THIS IS OUR YEAR!!! #isaythateveryyear #agirlcandreamcan'tshe #GOLEAFSGO
I always love when my classes coincide with each other; geography is my minor and I am in a cartography course now and taking a GIS course next semester! So spatial history is like my two loves connecting, pretty cool!! Anyway, here is an old map originally published circa 1635 by William Blaeu. It's crazy to think that people actually hand-made these maps and could still provide a lot of detail. It's also pretty cool to see ancient maps and compare how they thought the continents were arranged to what we know today.
Spatial History
1) What is the promise of Spatial History?
The promise of spatial history is to give historians a new medium to display their research and findings. Historians have widely relied on words and narratives to interpret the past, but they are slowly moving toward visual mediums such as GIS and maps. Spatial history is an exciting and new medium that historians are venturing into and it’s a fresh medium compared to popular uses by historians in the past. Spatial history is visually appealing and can be used in many different ways. Mapping can be used by military historians to depict how a battlefield was used during a war, or social historians can use maps to show population shifts during the industrial revolution. I think that as technology continues to evolve, historians will begin to embrace the benefits of technology and push the study of history further.
2) What are the obstacles? The possible problems?
Bodenhamer discusses the possible problem that historians may have when interpreting GIS and maps as oppose to their usual preference for words. The obvious problem is that, generally, historians have relied on documents containing words that give insight into the past so visuals such as maps can be foreign territory for many historians. Bodenhamer states that historians shy away from visuals because historians are logo-centric and more comfortable with words and narratives. Another possible problem that Bodenhamer discusses is the way that historians were trained. The Internet and personal computers have only been widely used in the past couple of decades so many historians were trained without the use of such technology. I think that technology can be difficult to learn for anyone who was not born in the technology era, and especially for historians who never relied on it in the past. Historians were trained to think logically, interpret words and narratives, and to dig through research in order to find evidence. The new era of technology is changing the ways of the past and I think that historians of the future will adapt better because they are more familiar with technology and obviously it has made its way into university classes. Technology is the way of the future and historians will have to adapt because visual mediums such as GIS and maps can be useful to historians by presenting information visually and giving historians an opportunity to interpret a new medium.
3) How do these readings connect with discussions we've had in class?
These readings connect with the discussions we’ve had in class because both highlight the benefits that technology is having on history as a discipline, but also the difficulties that historians may have when venturing into new technologies. These readings, as well as class discussions, discuss the new mediums that are available to historians today and how they can be used to benefit the study of history. Furthermore, the factor of financing is always prevalent when discussing research and technology, and GIS can be expensive to use; however, sometimes the reward is greater than the cost. I think that both the readings and the class discussions have taught us that technology is something that historians have to embrace and use in order to push the study of history further, and funding is often times the biggest obstacle.
A History of the Internet and the Digital Future is an in-depth look into the early stages of the Internet and how technology progressed over the next half century to develop the Internet we all know and love today. Author Johnny Ryan divides the book into three phases based on the timeline of the history of the Internet: Phase I: Distributed Network, Centrifugal Ideas, Phase II: Expansion, and Phase III: The Emerging Environment. It is through these phases that Ryan discusses pivotal moments in the Internet’s history and the various people responsible for pushing technology further. Ryan’s...