CosticÄ Acsinte Archive
sheepfilms
Mike Driver

bliss lane

oozey mess

gracie abrams
Jules of Nature
official daine visual archive
RMH
todays bird

blake kathryn
đ©” avery cochrane đ©”

No title available

PR's Tumblrdome
NASA

izzy's playlists!
Claire Keane
art blog(derogatory)

⣠Chile in a Photography âŁ
cherry valley forever
No title available
seen from United States
seen from Peru

seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from United States

seen from Argentina
seen from United States
seen from Spain
seen from United States
seen from Italy
seen from France

seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from Brazil

seen from Italy
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Canada

seen from United States
@molassesflood-blog
CosticÄ Acsinte Archive
Shooting Tintypes with an Out Door Studio.
Here is a vintage illustration of a portable studio. The sides move as does the top to control the light on the subject. Still the usage of a reflector and maybe a diffuser for certain effects may  be necessary.
via Mark Osterman
Cabinet Card
From Crime TV
MARQUISE L. CASATIÂ WEARING A COSTUME FOR A FANCY DRESS PARTY (PARIS, 1922)
(from LIFE.com)Â
Mrs Cora Brown Potter, 1897
by Fred Holland Day
Nebula Cake from Sprinkle Bakes
Robert Eggersâ âThe Witchâ Poster by MMÂ
âSpanish Moon Mothâ by Mike Howlet
Julia Margaret Cameron, A Study after the manner of Francia (detail), 1865. (Own photograph from the original print; National Media Museum, Bradford.)
Harry Kellar preforming levitation. I donât believe him.
Inspired by this entry in 4 gravitons: Whatâs so Spooky about Action at a Distance?
The key thing about quantum mechanics is that, as J. S. Bell showed, you canât have localityâŠunless you throw out another property, called realism. Realism is the idea that quantum states have definite values for measurements before those measurements are taken. And while that sounds important, most people find getting rid of it much less scary than getting rid of locality. In a non-realistic world, at least we can still predict probabilities, even if we canât observe certainties. In a non-local world, there might be aspects of physics that we just canât learn. And thatâs spooky.
â
TRF published today a nice followup of this post:
Locality correct, realism incorrect: why
I recommend a close reading of cited post, this is the final paragraph:
If you have mastered enough physics and mathematics to understand similar ideas but you are still uncertain about the claim that locality is right but realism (i.e. the basic framework of classical physics) is not, you should try to read this blog post many times and think at the same moment because the blog post does contain the simple proofs that causality (plus the arrow of time), locality, and non-realism are absolutely needed in any laws of physics that are at least remotely plausible.
For those of you who take Halloween decoration to a specificity level that requires reference assistance, you can always call upon the entomological resources of the Biodiversity Heritage Library, which contains works like American Spiders and Their Spinningwork by Henry McCook (1889).
Illustrated bats from the 1848 book A History of the Earth and Animated Nature.
(New York Public Library)
Woman with Chrysanthemum  -  Lorenzo Viani  1911
Italian 1882-1936
Oil on canvas
Gustav Heurlin - View of a walkway lined with crucifixes in Lithuania, 1933.