(via 20101007-PA070705.jpg (4032×2272))

Origami Around

oozey mess

titsay
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸

JBB: An Artblog!
Sweet Seals For You, Always

Discoholic 🪩
No title available

pixel skylines

tannertan36
Monterey Bay Aquarium
styofa doing anything
No title available

Kaledo Art
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

shark vs the universe

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
RMH

No title available
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

seen from Malaysia
seen from Italy
seen from United States
seen from Italy
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Brazil

seen from Italy

seen from Malaysia

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Türkiye
@mullett-blog
(via 20101007-PA070705.jpg (4032×2272))
(via The Colors - Inside CHANEL - YouTube )
(via skull1-3000x2700.jpg (3000×2700))
(via tumblr_nbxyy66LcH1rapb7ao1_500.gif (480×480))
Because today we live in a society in which spurious realities are manufactured by the media, by governments, by big corporations, by religious groups, political groups—and the electronic hardware exists by which to deliver these pseudo-worlds right into the heads of the reader, the viewer, the listener.
Philip K. Dick On Fine-Tuning Your B.S.-Meter To Spot "Pseudo-Realities"
Perceptual analysis in the 20th century has shown that at any given moment we see only a small amount. The movement of the eye gives us a bigger picture, which we assemble with memory in our heads. We see with memory. Is there not now a contradiction between our millions of images and the way we see the world? Knowledge of visual perception made in the 20th century is surely having an effect. I began to be bored with the image on TV a long time ago. It was an instinct that realized this was nobody’s view of the world, an unhuman view of it. I remember seeing a Disney cartoon of the 40s about elephants in Africa. It was a drawn film about their lives, not humorous like Dumbo, but a beautifully observed picture of them moving—slowly because of their weight. I said to a friend who was watching it with me that it was far more interesting to look at than photographs of elephants, even moving photographs. Why? Because the drawn one was an account of seeing by a human being. Is this not really all that possible for humans? The movie now seems a tired and ephemeral medium. For many years it didn’t. Was this because of the novelty of it, or our acceptance of its being ‘real’? Something looking similar had occupied space at a certain time in a certain place. Are we moving into a post-photographic age? What does that mean—a new drawing and painting? There have been a few people already who have suggested that the new digital cinema is a sub-genre of painting. The straight line is changing direction. Exciting times are ahead.
David Hockney
Hockney / Liebovitz collage
Sound is almost a drug. It’s so pure that when it goes in your ears, it instantly does something to you
david lynch
Sounds of Aronofsky (by kogonada)
The Beatles - Revolution