Buck My Life @mybutthurts - Tumblr Blog

i’m not “lazy” i’m just a fragile victorian maiden. i can only handle 1-2 mildly taxing activities a day before i have to put myself down for a nap until dinner

mierac

I desperately need to go to the seaside for 6 months for my health.

chastyre

#nobody these days has any respect for a delicate constitution 😒#why is no one captivated by me i am literally a sickly pale artist who is prone to fainting and loves flowers and poetry#i need to have a tragic romance and then die of something absurd like too much rain (via @guinevereslancelot)

babyfoxcollectionthings

ode-on-a-grecian-butt

Illustrations Show Size Difference Between Prehistoric Animals and Modern Descendants

@hangyo_smile

kidz

てのりぬいぐるみ（「映画すみっコぐらし青い月夜のまほうのコ」）

terf-gifs

- C

opabiniawillreturn-deactivated2

hey! because this seems to go over your head, i thought i ought to let you know: its really, really easy to let trans people exist without being a dick :)

good thing I've never killed a trans person then

coolguycy

you can be a dick without killing people <3

opabiniawillreturn-deactivated2

I'm letting them exist. that was my main point.

coolguycy

you let them exist, yes, but not without being a dick. that was my main point

opabiniawillreturn-deactivated2

how am I a dick?

astrodaisies

Doesn’t need to be explained, everyone here knows you’re a dick plain and simple. You’re not a feminist if trans women aren’t included in that.

opabiniawillreturn-deactivated2

why? who decided that? how am I supposed to stop being a dick if I don't know what I'm doing wrong??

astrodaisies

well, firstly, the fact that you think respecting trans women and never having killed a trans person are the same thing gives a pretty clear picture as to what kind of person you are.

opabiniawillreturn-deactivated2

I never said that. the anon said I'm not letting trans leke exist but I am! the only way I would be not letting them exist would be by killing them.

sakuratreepoetry-deactivated202

Killing someone is definitely not where the line is, op

opabiniawillreturn-deactivated2

if we're speaking literally, then not letting someone exist would mean killing them. I'm not saying that's the boundary for respect..

sakuratreepoetry-deactivated202

Really? Have you ever heard of suppression? That’s definitely not letting something exist by claiming that “trans women aren’t women” op. The definition of suppression is trying to forcibly end something, that’s exactly what you’re trying to do by making your radfem claims.

opabiniawillreturn-deactivated2

how are they women? what is a woman?

sakuratreepoetry-deactivated202

A woman is a social constructs created by society. They feel like women, so they are in turn, women. It’s as simple as that.

opabiniawillreturn-deactivated2

so being a woman is feeling like a woman. then what does a woman feel like?

sakuratreepoetry-deactivated202

opabiniawillreturn-deactivated2

ah ok. so a woman is-

someone gentle, empathetic, humble, sensitive, have long flowing hair and clear skin, someone skinny with no body hair or facial hair, and are less favorable leaders.

that's what a woman is?

sakuratreepoetry-deactivated202

It’s not what a woman is, it’s what society has deemed as feminine. If someone wants to identify as a women they’ll want to feel aligned with their feminine attributes. I’m not saying this is what a women is, in saying this is what a trans woman might feel more comfortable as

opabiniawillreturn-deactivated2

then what is a woman?

sakuratreepoetry-deactivated202

https://youtu.be/AU1A8B2NuSw

Here’s a trans YouTuber I like, she’s extremely funny and sweet! She’s also a woman

opabiniawillreturn-deactivated2

can you give me a solid definition of woman that will apply to every single woman

sakuratreepoetry-deactivated202

Ok fine:

If they wanna be a woman, they’re a woman

There’s something that applies to every single woman. A solid definition? Not everyone is that same, so there is no definition of a literal gender

opabiniawillreturn-deactivated2

so a woman is anyone who wants to be a woman

now here's your mistake: a word can't define itself. you gave me a circular definition

sakuratreepoetry-deactivated202

That because a woman is a construct, it doesn’t have to be a definition. Everyone has a different feeling of what a woman is, including trans woman.

opabiniawillreturn-deactivated2

woman is a word we made to describe a specific thing. it was made to specify when one is talking about adult females of the human species without having to say that every time. language is a construct, doesn't mean words don't have meaning.

terf-gifs

@crisis-ultimate

"female" and "male" become as meaningless as "floopdiloop" without a real definition. we need these terms to mean something because they denote oppressed and oppressor classes along the axis of sexism. the immutable traits these words describe are the traits for which women (by which I mean female humans) have been oppressed worldwide for all of human history. if "woman" means nothing, we have no language to describe ourselves as a marginalised group fighting for our rights and safety. the only reason you think it's harmless for a man to identify as a woman is because you don't truly believe women are oppressed. no one would have to explain to you why a white person can't identify as a black person and then say they're the most oppressed type of black person because no one actually sees them as black and because they're not getting access to resources specifically reserved for black people. the fact that a man can perform femininity and y'all will jump to say that makes him just as– if not more– oppressed for being a woman as the women who are groomed on the basis of their female sex from the second they're born, as the women in menstrual huts, as the women attacked with acid, as the women forced to carry their rapists' babies to term, as the women denied jobs on the assumption they'll later leave to be homemakers or on the assumption that they're unqualified because they're female, as the women groomed into being housewives for men much older than them specifically because of their perceived female fertility.... I could go on forever because that's how fucking infinite the list of sex-specific issues ""AFAB""s face on the basis of being ""AFAB"". there is a millennia-old history of misogyny and it is demonstrably (and obviously!!) sex-based. What trait are women oppressed for if not their sex? with your airy bullshit non-definition of womanhood, how do the oppressor class (men) even tell whom to oppress? if "woman" is so internally self defined and meaningless, how did they know whom to deny the vote? who couldn't open a bank account? whom to forcibly impregnate? whom to marry off with a dowry? this so-open-minded-your-brain-falls-out lack of critical thought from libfem "activism" makes it seem like people are oppressed for wanting to perform femininity as though femininity itself isn't something which is artificially superimposed through intense socialisation of most "AFAB"s from birth. women weren't denied the vote because they were the ones in skirts, they were denied the vote and restricted to skirts because they were female. "a woman is anyone who identified as a woman is a woman is a woman is a woman" is tautological empty nothingness on par with the meaningless "floopdiloop"; it is not progressive and it is actively hindering feminism's progress.

so again: define woman.