Probably a dumb question, but why do you think people are so focused on "proving" runic divination? From what I know about Norse magic (which is very likely a lot less than you do, so I might be missing something) divination in sagas and poems relied on other methods (like seidr rituals, singing chants, asking the dead directly, etc.) while runes were used to curse, heal, protect, etc. Yet it seems to me many ignore all that and just focus on divination. Does that just... sound cooler, or smth?
Ah fuck, I started answering this and then I forgot about it.
I think this is a great question, to be honest. I think thereâs a lot that goes into this, and I donât think itâs possible to answer it cohesively, but I think itâs important to try. I think that there are a lot of advantages that modern runecasting has over other forms of divination that contribute to its status, and itâs beneficial to us to acknowledge that even though I also think some of these things are problems.
For one thing, its popularity is self-sustaining. In my experience more people know about runecasting than know about heathenry. Before Norse societyâs current moment in pop culture, it was very likely to be the very first thing a given person learned about Norse society. If you Google ârunesâ the first thing that comes up is Wikipedia but the second is a site that advocates it (and even worse, does so while pretending to be an academic site). So most people are probably coming into it already wrong, and then are force-fed a bunch of information that meets their expectations instead of correcting them.
We also have to consider the impact of a personâs past experiences. By the time most people learn that runecasting is not something that Vikings did, they have already done it themselves, and very likely did it with the assumption that they were taking part in a genuinely ancient ritual. That has an impact on someone. I know that I have had emotional experiences during runecasts.
And for full disclosure, a lot of this applies to me. When I make a pissed-off blog post about runes a lot of that frustration comes from memories of my own experiences of learning about how badly Iâd been lied to and had my time wasted, and how much misinformation I spread myself. That last part especially can be a hard pill to swallow.
Anyway, to the extent that this describes the problem it does so only from the perspective of individuals. I think there are more systematic/societal reasons for it.
Modern runic mysticism originates in Hermeticism in the 16th century (to be more specific, a self-described Rosicrucian, Johan Bure), and is therefore not part of a Norse/Germanic tradition at all but really a branch of the Western Esoteric Tradition. In particular, runes were used by Bure as a way for non-Jews (in his case specifically Swedes, though this would be adapted to âAryansâ over time) to make the claim that Kabbalah actually belonged to them, and that the Jews had gotten it from them.
A lot of modern people have a certain idea of what âmysticismâ or, like, âspiritualityâ I guess, is supposed to look like, and that expectation is heavily indebted to Hermeticism (and more sinister, to Theosophy). Hermeticism is an extremely broad and diverse phenomenon, and itâs one Iâm only surface-level familiar with, and the last thing I want to do is disparage the entire tradition, BUT modern rune magic has in its core a universalist essentialism that goes back to the Neoplatonic roots of the Hermetic ideas that informed it.
In one sense, there seems to have always been a deep sense of inferiority among modern heathens. Modern heathenry has been marked by attempts to prove that weâre a ârealâ tradition deserving of respect by other modern institutions, by simulating the affectations of ârealâ religions like codified lists of virtues, insistence on fictive unbroken lineages, etc. This really just says that these heathens have completely internalized the western expectations of legitimacy for a religion that have been used as justification for conquest and conversion, and deny legitimacy to indigenous cultures unless they perform the expectations of their colonizers; as well as fail to actually understand the traditions that theyâre trying to copy. I genuinely wonder whether we can trace this sense of inadequacy back to the first heathens to model themselves on the Roman empire such as the Franks, who copied and pasted the Roman mythological origin for themselves in order to claim that they too were the descendants of Trojans (this story spread throughout Europe, and is found in Snorriâs Prologus).
Explanations for modern rune magic oscillate back and forth between the âthis is objectively trueâ of a linear, ordered universal time that bases its truth claim on it being genuinely ancient; and a liberal individualism (âif it works for you then it worksâ) that is itself encased in the universalism of everyone being a unique bounded cohesive individual rational subject. This is the dominant paradigm of modern western human society, and it should not be surprising that inhabitants of that modern western human society would gravitate toward ideas that are products of it.
But the real bait-and-switch here is that it hasnât actually changed from being a way to seize the products of thousands of years of Jewish tradition without needing to pay respect to the Jewish people who developed and articulated it. Nowadays most people donât even know theyâre doing it, because they donât know about the modern development of rune magic, they take statements like âthe runes are the elemental energies that make up creationâ or whatever the fuck at face-value because weâve been acculturated to just understand and expect that from like New Age ideas or whatever, completely ignorant of the deep exegesis of the creation story in Genesis that it takes to explain the position of the Hebrew letters in Kabbalah.
So basically the claim of ancientness serves an important function as a narrative device that exempts people from knowing its actual inception in an act of antisemitic cultural theft, and allows them to continue to perpetrate that theft. Further, most modern people who are interested in Norse and Germanic culture actually arenât. They have an idealized image constructed for consumption by modern Western people (especially influenced by nationalist romanticism of the 17-1800â˛s) and they are motivated to preserve that construction against threats like historical research.
There is one other, much less important thing I want to mention quickly: the claim of ancientness gets people out of learning any more about runes than the perfect, pristine, fully-formed elder futhark. This is probably related to 19th century Norse scholars who saw all evidence of heathenry as the degraded remnants of a once-cohesive, pure, uncorrupted original that could be pieced back together through philology. But also itâs an excuse to not learn about a tradition that actually is complicated and has depth but takes hard work to grasp.
There is more to talk about on this subject but I think this is the most important stuff.