Nelipot Thinker

I am a seeker of truth.

[carlboygenius]

[nelipotthinker]

They say, "If it isn't broken, don't fix it." I say, "If it isn't optimum, optimize it."

[amiagoodperson]

f(z) = 0.75 * (z^2 + 2z) + c, c = e^(i * (t + k))

[beesandbombs]

[geometric-aesthetic]

We love you Isabella! Keep on posting :)

Thanks, man! I will try my best <3

[vyramine]

Depicted here are tetrahedron structures multiplying by octaves: 1, 8, 64, 512 & 4096. The tetrahedron is the most fundamental geometric building block of the geometry of the fabric of the vacuum of space. Two polarized larger tetrahedrons creates a star tetrahedron comprised of 8 smaller tetrahedrons. Putting 8 star tetrahedrons together creates a 64 tetrahedron grid inside of which 2 octaves of cube octahedron are formed: a perfectly balanced geometry that Buckminster Fuller called the “vector equilibrium”. The cube octahedron is the only 3D geometry that is equal and opposite in every possible way, where every line (vector) in the geometry are of equal length, including from the center of the geometry to the edges. Nassim Haramein theorizes that an infinite scalar fractal of perfectly stacked tetrahedral geometry is the very fabric of our existence as more and more tetrahedrons create fractal octaves of the perfectly balanced cube octahedron geometry. At a total of 512 perfectly stacked tetrahedrons, 2 octaves of cube octahedron geometry are formed, at 4096 another octave and the pattern continues both infinitely bigger and infinitely smaller to create the perfectly balanced geometry of the space that exists on all scales everywhere in the universe. The thing we call we call “empty space” has been proven to actually be completely full of energy. The perfectly balanced geometry of infinite scalar cube octahedron causes the infinite energy in space (the plenum, the aether, the zero point field, the quantum foam, the vacuum, the source field, space, god, love or whatever you want to call it), to seem to us to be totally empty nothingness because the energy is in a perfect state of balanced equilibrium on all scales. Nassim Haramein has coined this geometry as being the “holofractographic structure” of the universe. A new era of our existence on this planet is emerging as we learn how to interact with the geometry of the vacuum and extract energy right from the structure of space itself. With this new understanding of our universe, an era of infinite abundance is on the horizon.

[themathkid]

[hyrodium]

The rotating triangles which is inscribed on surface of Regular Octahedron make Regular Octahedron, Regular Isosahedron, and Cuboctahedron!

[systmsofsound]

[underthesymmetree]

Phi - The Golden Ratio presents itself everywhere in life, from basic geometry & crystal formations, to plants, planetary ratios and galactic formations. It is the most efficient ratio under near-perfect systems.

Read the Book    |    Follow

[geometric-aesthetic]

Toroidal space.

[nouralogical]

[nelipotthinker]

[mindfuckmath-deactivated2016062]

[nelipotthinker]

I am a collection of water, calcium and organic molecules called Carl Sagan. You are a collection of almost identical molecules with a different collective label. But is that all? Is there nothing in here but molecules? Some people find this idea somehow demeaning to human dignity. For myself, I find it elevating that our universe permits the evolution of molecular machines as intricate and subtle as we. But the essence of life is not so much the atoms and simple molecules that make us up as the way in which they are put together. Every now and then we read that the chemicals which constitute the human body cost ninety-seven cents or ten dollars or some such figure; it is a little depressing to find our bodies valued so little. However, these estimates are for human beings reduced to our simplest possible components. We are made mostly of water, which costs almost nothing; the carbon is costed in the form of coal; the calcium in our bones as chalk; the nitrogen in our proteins as air (cheap also); the iron in our blood as rusty nails. If we did not know better, we might be tempted to take all the atoms that make us up, mix them together in a big container and stir. We can do this as much as we want. But in the end all we have is a tedious mixture of atoms. How could we have expected anything else?

Carl Sagan

[nelipotthinker]

[steveyaas]

If the realization that there are infinitely many points, and thus infinitely many numbers, between the values of 1 and 1.0000000000000001 doesn’t amaze, humble or astound you, there is a real chance you aren’t alive.