why do you even have that username. you’re not nice OR normal
YOU ARE THE REASON
ojovivo
Jules of Nature

titsay

★
RMH
occasionally subtle
Three Goblin Art
Cosmic Funnies
AnasAbdin

Product Placement
will byers stan first human second

@theartofmadeline

shark vs the universe
Show & Tell

izzy's playlists!
Monterey Bay Aquarium

blake kathryn

JBB: An Artblog!

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Russia
seen from Australia
seen from United States

seen from Australia

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia
seen from Belgium

seen from United States
seen from Canada

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
@nicenormalwitch
why do you even have that username. you’re not nice OR normal
can i say i dont give a fuck if anyone is 'performative reading' bc like at least they are reading at all. people are reading less and less so idrc if someone is reading to cultivate a certain image or whatever the fuck performative reading means
Well, yes lol that's why I say so
In my experience trans women at most pick up the surface-level traits associated with females (posturing as shy soft and feminine, smiling, using feminine language etc) but keep very deeply male behaviors (waiting until females are comfortable before diving into sexually inappropriate behaviors, speaking over females, having jealousy or disdain for female traits that comes out basically the same way as hateful males etc). When they are in groups with other trans women it's obvious.
The worst of them will use these former traits to their advantage to create a false sense of security for females and/or explicitly deny the latter existing, as we see with transfeminists.
Very very obnoxious to me when a transandrophobe says “trans men have it better because they’re just seen as butches” in what universe are butches treated well???
Women should get back in the kitchen -> trans men doing housework is basically reparations lol
Trans men are just confused girls trying to escape misogyny -> trans men are all going to detransition into TERFs
Feminists have gone too far, men are the ones who are truly oppressed -> check your AFAB privilege
Women can wear pants now what more do they want? -> trans men have it easy because they’re just seen as dykes but men can’t wear skirts
Your period is making you hysterical -> T makes you so angry all the time
Women shouldn’t speak up -> Jesus not everything is about you tboys, listen to trans women
You were asking for it if you went out dressed like that -> people wouldn’t be transphobic if you just put in effort to pass
Ew gross don’t want to hear about vaginas -> when you talk about going to the gynecologist it makes you sound a little TERFy…
I’m so tired of all this feminist shit -> stop saying your oppression has anything to do with being AFAB
Women make up false accusations -> tboys straight up lie because they’re addicted to being oppressed
interesting
And it's even scarier when you realize that transgender beliefs hold even more power than actual religion now because they're actually able to get away with so many of these things that are not tolerated from a religious angle.
We had come so far as a society to fight for secularism and the separation of church and state specifically, only for this to happen. A big reason why we were able to make such progress as a civilization was because of the support for scientific evidence, and yet these men somehow bought the scientific community into compliance so now it looks like gender "theory" is actually supported by science. Even the people who do speak out in the scientific community have spoken about the threats they face to their jobs and livelihoods for doing so. This is no doubt all because of the intersection with the medical/pharmaceutical industry. They really are the ones calling the shots. They saw an opportunity for an unprecedented amount of profit and women were acceptable collateral.
If anyone has some good reading recs on this specifically please share!
people will insult you and harass you until you're tired of speaking and then use your silence against you smh
"I don't care enough to understand what's going on but I'm more than happy to lie about you anyway" - @pisceanpharies
Like yeah, if people went around lying about you all day you'd be a little annoyed and defensive too.
@nicenormalwitch according to this person you've never talked about the issue, which is super hilarious.
Funny that she deleted everything right after I replied to her directly telling her that I've spoken on this dozens of times but I'm tired of repeating myself to people who seem to take pleasure in the idea of my suffering to the extent that they will make shit up about me because the real story isn't interesting or juicy enough, and are far more interested in cackling and going KAM than actually making a world that's safe for women which requires that men both as a class and as individuals to change.
Being hostile to that change is against the best interests of women and the only argument I ever hear is that "men lie about changing" which feels tantamount to saying holding men accountable is too hard so why bother
Stop raising your daughters to be damsels in distress.
It's the parent's fault for teaching her to prioritize her looks, putting her in sandals in the rain, and raising her different than your son.
RAISE YOUR DAUGHTERS AND SONS THE SAME. Gender roles start before conception when you choose to buy your female fetus bows and tell her as a newborn how pretty she is, versus buying your male fetus sensible shit like teething rings and telling him as a newborn how tough he is.
I'm sick of seeing girls call themselves princesses and being groomed to be pathetic and 100% dependent on males.
Imagine being so deranged that you seriously look at a cute video of a little boy taking care of his little sister and think 'wow she's being groomed to be pathetic'. I'm sorry OP.
She is being groomed to be dependent (I cannot cross a puddle myself, I need a boys help) and to be overly concerned with her appearance (I have to worry about my shoes getting dirty).
Let me ask you, do you ever think you would see a video of a little boy being carried by his older sister because the little boy is concerned about getting his shoes muddy?  Little children generally don’t care about concepts like getting their clothes muddy, because they don’t understand anything about cleaning, money, time, or effort with regards to clothing. Adults do understand this. Adults also understand that children are easily taught to depend on others and “learned helplessness” is taught to little girls a lot.
It’s also the phrasing used that inspired this reaction. I am an older sister, and I have several younger brothers. There were many times when my brothers were younger that they needed my help because I was older and bigger than them, and I could help them with things that they could not do on their own, because they were still children and too young to do it. However, this was never presented as me rescuing them, or being a knight in shining armor for them, or anything of the sort. The way it was typically phrase when I helped my siblings was that I was being maternal in some way. Isn’t that interesting? I wasn’t “rescuing” my brothers, I was “mothering” them, but this boy is not said to be “fathering” his sister, he is said to be “rescuing” her. Would we ever say he was “fathering” her? No, fathering usually means to have offspring, not to nurture, even though this boys actions are exactly like a father who is helping his child cross a puddle. That’s something to pay attention to as well.
The way I was raised is you help people that need your help, regardless of who they are, but you don’t infantilize anyone. It’s perfectly fine to teach an older sibling that as the older sibling, they should protect and help their younger sibling, but it’s very important not to present this as a gendered idea, because it shouldn’t be. Anyone who needs help should get help, and nobody should be infantilized and made to feel like they can’t do something or that they have to be overly dependent on other people.
The women talking on this post are women who have experienced being trained into learned helplessness, or being otherwise stereotyped, or taught to be overly concerned about our appearance. We are speaking from the experience of that little girl. No one gets to dismiss our opinions simply because you think this is just a cute video.
I have just a cute photo of a little boy kissing me on the lips when I was a toddler, because my parents thought it was cute to make me kiss little boys and make little boys kiss me.  These might be cute photos, but I can also look at those and say, well, that didn’t really teach me a good understanding of consent and boundaries, did it? And I can also understand that within the context of a society in which my boundaries as a female are constantly disregarded and disrespected. It might still be a cute photo, but it’s also a snapshot of a specific experience within a larger context that I can analyze and understand. 
I'm getting so sick of this "feminists overreact to everything, this isn't a big deal"
Yeh. Being carried across a puddle isn't a big deal on its own. But it's not JUST being carried across a puddle. It's being given bows, being told you're pretty, being told not to dirty yourself. Be good, sit quietly, play with baby dolls and toy vacuums. All while your brother is told to go out and play, play in the mud, roughhouse, be a kid.
It's not just a puddle. The puddle is one piece in a big puzzle of female socialization teaching girls to be helpless and dependent on other people (aka men) all the way into adulthood.
you do know that no one is entitled to forgive you for hitting your wife in anger, right? Like instead of arguing with every person who calls you a wifebeater you could just ignore it because no one's mind is gonna be changed by your or your wife.
I didn't hit my wife in anger, that is literally part of a misinformation campaign created by anti feminists to discredit me, it has nothing to do with actually helping women or standing up against domestic violence.
I've talked about what happened, my wife has talked about what happened. It is laughable to call it wife beating and honestly to do so is harming victims of domestic abuse.
I brought the story up specifically about how anger unchecked can lead to domestic violence and to help men who don't want to hurt their partners learn to be better so it never gets to that point.
For anyone outside the loop the quick recap is that years ago my wife and I were going through a rough patch, during an argument she got angry and started shaking me and I slapped her to make her stop after asking her to. I was angry, I realized that my anger and impulsive, male socialized reactions could lead to domestic violence and I made a point of changing and unlearning male socialization.
People acting in bad faith have taken that story, and used it as a weapon to silence my wife and myself creating the illusion that I am a wifebeater and she is some sort of slave held in silence who somehow has a tumblr account. It is simply made to separate me from feminists and anyone who I may speak to.
Buying into this harms actual victims of domestic abuse. Both @nicenormalwitch and I come from households where DV was common, we know what that looks like and how growing up in that environment influences your behavior.
Talking about and understanding it is how we do better.
we can’t talk here contact me in my dream tonight
reading up about ex-tgirl, I almost gave him a follow before everything was outed. haha you have anger issues skill issue. get fucked woman abuser
No you didn't, you just want an excuse to be mad at someone especially since you are willing to buy into a literal misinformation campaign to do so.
I think this post really exemplifies the two issues I have with radfems these days.
1: They are so reactionary that they are willing to believe anything no matter how exaggerated
2: They don't believe in change, so even when someone has an unfortunate past and is trying to get better, they literally contribute into trying to drag them backwards because it's more convenient for their narrative.
Hi OP, I am the woman in question and not only have you fallen for a disinformation campaign that I have spoken out against, I really have to wonder why the idea of stopping men from committing acts of abuse brings you so much pleasure.
Why is it so important to you that abusive men continue to be abusive until they die?
If you cared about women you would want men to change instead of gleefully cackling at the idea that they shouldn't.
I guess I just don’t understand the idea of labels being limiting. The word lesbian doesn’t limit me to dating women, being a lesbian does. The only way a label can be limiting is if you aren’t what the label describes.
Tell that to the gendies and see them implode with anger.
“The only way a label can be limiting is if you aren’t what the label describes.”
That’s exactly why trans activists find labels limiting.
idk what neurodivergent young adult needs to hear this but you are NOT supposed to give 100% at your job. I've gotten more promotions and raises since I started giving 40-60%, which my evil CEO uncle informed me is what bosses actually expect when they say 110%. My mental health has improved tremendously. I've spent 2 out of 5 workdays secretly writing my novel for the last 2 years and I've never been more respected and appreciated. Also--when you see glaring wasteful errors in the company's operating systems, say absolutely nothing! Embrace inefficiency. It is your friend in this capitalist hellscape.
I understand that desisted people do not go through hormones and face permanent damage through medical intervention, but people act as if the phase is experimental and just a quirky time of your life if you are. But that phase had once consumed me.
You are skating on thin ice with these communities. Being told that if you don't get medical intervention, you will die. Delving into self-harm. Hypersexualizing. Burying your same sex attraction like it's something to be ashamed of. The possibility of causing damage to your body through binding. Losing friends. Mentally degrading yourself ever time you look into a mirror because of your biological reality.
It consumes every bit of your life. So no, it's not a silly pronouns changing phase. It is traumatizing.
It doesn't really matter if we describe the community as Queer because conservatives will always find us strange and try to kill us.
Also, are you gonna start getting mad about black people reclaiming the n word next?
There's this thing called not contributing. It's like how I don't call women b*c even though if I personally stopped it wouldn't stop misogyny. It's because I don't want to be part of the problem, and let others around me think that it's okay behavior.
I'm not in the black community and have no right to speak for them. But it is a fact that some people in the black community(including people I know) are against black people using the N word as much and in the ways that they do. If they are right or not is an issue for black people to talk about amongst themselves, but I as a white person sure as hell aren't going to start calling them the n-word community even if a random black person said it was okay.
It's also worth noting that while the religious fundamentalist branch of american conservatism that gained large amounts of influence in the 80s is typically anti-gay, historically there has actually been a lot of gay conservatism in the US which argued for equal rights based on a small government, pro privacy viewpoint, which are both conservative political stances in the US.
If you want to learn more about the history of gay conservatism in the US I would recommend reading "Coming out Republican: A History of the Gay Right" by Neil J. Young
To say that "conservatives will always find us strange and try to kill us." is factually incorrect. Homophobes find us strange and want to kill us. Many homophobes are Republican and many homophobes are Democrats.
You can argue for gay rights using conservative political stances (like small government and pro privacy) and you can argue against gay rights using progressive political stances (inclusivity against homosexuality I.E. "your club, organization, sexual orientation is bigoted because it doesn't include the opposite sex")
There is no political party or movement immune to homophobia and when you act like there is and it's yours, you open the door to homophobia festering and growing inside your community; so much so that you might reach a point where you and your community are calling homosexuals slurs and telling them to shut up when they tell you to knock it off because you perceive yourself as infallible
GWYNN and TALON: season two