I HAVE A THINKING PROBLEM @notveryraven - Tumblr Blog

it would be so cool to defect to DPRK and whenever some liberal posted about how they kill you for having a K in your last name on every other Wednesday you could just be like Uhhh no they don’t dumbass. I literally live here

evan-collins90

McDonald’s at the Denton House - New Hyde Park, NY (year unknown)

Designed by Haverson/Rockwell Architects

Scanned from the book, Restaurant Style

notveryraven

Long Island stays winning bitch

COP: sorry honey, I won’t be home for dinner. I’m working late.

Smash cut to him sorting through a big pile of dogs on his desk trying to decide which one to shoot first

just saw some Reddit mf like “I’m at a hotel in Saigon…” check the calendar bitch. the good guys won in 1975, you’re at a hotel in Ho Chi Minh City

if the new Evil Dead movie isn’t funny I’m going to kill myself

mariamlovesyou

OK I'm in the pussy 👍. Now what

mr-selfdestruct

got my Twitter account permanently suspended by joking in a big-follower account’s mentions that a certain subset of stoners should be killed

lying in bed not doing anything and the thought comes unbidden to my mind “I’m being annoying”

#????

cryptotheism

"God of War should do Christianity next" You are describing Bayonetta.

notveryraven

I’m in a Twitter group DM (sorry) with someone who jokingly pitched a God of War squeakquel where Kratos takes on American mythology. and he meant like Colonel Sanders and Bart Simpson, but my interpretation was fearsome critters, Johnny Appleseed, Paul Bunyan, and now I’m obsessed with this idea

heritageposts

Left Tumblr in like 2016 and now I'm back as a Twitter Refugee, I feel so sad I missed out on so much and I barely recognize this place from how it was before... Any advise now that I'm back?

become a marxist-leninist

heritageposts

and are these 'tankies' in the room with us now, McCarthy?

heritageposts

It is impossible to speak seriously about Marxism in the West without incorporating the role of Christianity in each social formation. “West

There is a great tendency in the eastern left, according to Perry Anderson, to separate western and eastern Marxism. Western Marxism is basically a kind of Marxism which has, as a key characteristic, never exercised political power. It is a Marxism that has, more and more frequently, concerned itself with philosophical and aesthetic issues. It has pulled back, for example, from criticism of political economy and the problem of the conquest of political power. More and more it has taken a historic distance from the concrete experiences of socialist transition in the Soviet Union, China, Viet Nam, Cuba and so forth. This western Marxism considers itself to be superior to eastern Marxism because it hasn’t tarnished Marxism by transforming it into an ideology of the State like, for example, Soviet Marxism, and it has never been authoritarian, totalitarian or violent. This Marxism preserves the purity of theory to the detriment of the fact that it has never produced a revolution anywhere on the face of the Earth – this is a very important point. Wherever a victorious socialist revolution has taken place in the West, like Cuba, it is much more closely associated with the so-called eastern Marxism than with this western Marxism produced in Western Europe, the United States, Canada and parts of South America . . .

Many Marxists act the same way. Their biggest worry is the purity of the doctrine. Every time that historical facts challenge the doctrine or show the complexity of the practical operationality of elements of the theory, they deny that these elements are part of the story of Marxist theory and doctrine. This is, for example, what doctrines of betrayal are built on. Every movement that appears to stray a bit from these “pure” models that were created a priori is explained through the concept of betrayal, or is explained as “state capitalism.” Therefore, nothing is socialism and everything is state capitalism. Nothing is socialist transition and everything is state capitalism. The revolution is only a revolution during that glorious moment of taking political power. Starting from the moment of building a new social order, its over. Revolution is always a political process which has two moments: a moment of destruction of the old capitalist order and taking power, and a moment of building a new order. The contradictions, the problems, the failures, the mistakes, sometimes even the crimes, mainly happen during this moment of building the new order. So when the time comes to evaluate the building of a new social order -- which is where, apparently, the practice always appears to stray from the purity of theory -- the specific appears corrupted in the face of the universal. It is at this point that the idea of betrayal is evoked, that the idea of counter revolution is evoked, and that the idea of State Capitalism appears in order to preserve the purity of theory.

how do you get the funny posts on here. who’s being funny

ok I absentmindedly clicked a Tumblr link and I’ve been reading my dashboard—it’s nice as hell on here now that no one fucking posts