Week 10 - Nature Interpretation's Role in Environmental Sustainability
As a bright-eyed, 18-year-old who wanted to change the world, I couldn’t wait to study environmental governance when I got to university. In my mind, there was nothing more important than saving the planet for future generations. Although I still feel like that four years later, my once fiery passion dwindled throughout my undergrad. The more I learned about all the horrible ways humans were destroying the environment, the more hopeless I felt. My spiral into nihilism and cynicism often left me with unanswered questions like “what’s the point of it all?”. Part of my frustration came from the fact that half of my university degree was spent online. How could I truly learn about nature from the confining walls of my bedroom? It almost felt like teaching a medical student how to perform surgery by playing Operation.
Nevertheless, I know that I wasn’t alone in this universally isolating experience. The world was hit with a pandemic, and we got through it as best as we could. COVID showed us how to adapt by doing everything online–work, school, shopping, you name it. However, the impacts of this technological transition still linger, namely due to “Nature-Deficit Disorder”. Coined by Richard Louv in 2005, this term refers to how people (especially children) spend a lot less time outdoors than previously (Hooykaas, Unit 8, 2024). For example, schools today provide very limited opportunities for children to go outside due to liability concerns (Rodenbrug, 2019). While there are risks of being outside, I would argue that there’s more risks of staying inside. Aside from the mental and physical health impacts, learning how to respectfully coexist with nature is a lost skill among many of us.
Western culture has reduced the various parts of nature to simplified commodities: a tree is viewed as timber, a fish is viewed as food, a mountaintop is viewed as a mine, etc. This narrow way of thinking is what led to extractive colonialism, and it’s why economic profit is still prioritized over environmental sustainability. On the other hand, governments have set aside huge swaths of land in national parks and other areas to protect nature. While national parks serve many recreational purposes, they have been historically used to dispossess Indigenous peoples of their traditional territories. These parks and other areas of “pristine wilderness” are also places of privilege, which shift the responsibility of sustainability to out there instead of right here, at home. This duality of nature is presented in William Cronon’s essay called “The Trouble with Wilderness; or, getting back to the wrong nature”. He argues that the idea of untouched, “pristine wilderness” is a socially constructed myth because Indigenous communities have in fact shaped the environment for millenia. They were able to do so sustainably because of an ethical relationship to the land based on respect and reciprocity. My personal ethic as a nature interpreter begins with ensuring that I don’t reproduce the myth of “pristine wilderness” or that “all humans are bad for the environment”. As described by Cronon (1995), this is important because:
“The wilderness dualism tends to cast any use as abuse, and thereby denies us a middle ground in which responsible use and non-use might attain some kind of balanced, sustainable relationship.”
So how do we find this middle ground, and how can we help children explore it too?
It starts by accepting that humans are a part of the natural systems around us (Rodenburg, 2019). With every breath and bite we take, humans are dependent on all the plants, animals, microorganisms, and nonliving entities that sustain us. Look no further than your own microbiome, backyard, or community garden. Places close to home offer the most opportunity for sustainably. While many environmental issues like climate change are global, place-based identity also plays an important role in determining our relationship to nature (Wals et al., 2014).
To achieve true sustainability, however, this relationship to nature must be based on something other than its use. Therefore, another responsibility as a nature interpreter is to foster deeper connections to nature through different means, like music and art. For children, relationship building is all about storytelling (Rodenburg, 2019). It’s about enabling them to be leaders of their own discovery and letting their imaginations fill in the gaps. To give a plant or animal a name and a story is much more powerful than simply referring to it as an “it”. Giving children the opportunity to care for a plant or animal themselves can also empower them to build lifelong connections with nature. Further, establishing a relationship to nature is about building relationships with the people who share it with you. This can start with your friends and family, but can also extend to your neighbourhood and community. In this video, Richard Louv gives the example of ‘Family Nature Clubs’, which started with one family and has grown to over 700.
Most importantly, my approach as a nature interpreter is to try to remain optimistic…despite recent election results. This is especially challenging since “we’ve been going backwards” ever since the beginning of the environmental movement, and have been “fighting the same battles” for decades (DavidSuzukiFDN, 2012). Aside from needing a paradigm shift, our biggest setback is our negative perception of the future, not unlike dystopian movies (DavidSuzukiFDN, 2012). Indeed, many representations of the future climate often present doomsday scenarios. We are continuously fed stories of destruction and despair that are not balanced with stories of regeneration and resilience. How can we leave a better world for future generations if we don’t even believe in it?
There have been countless times when I wanted to give up, but that would ultimately be a dishonour to myself and future generations. Rather than dumping all this pressure on children, my responsibility is to leave them with the tools that I never had; to show them that humans have the potential to do good for the environment, not just bad. But for now, let them enjoy being children (in nature, of course).
And so, I leave you with this:
Cronon, W. (1995). The Trouble with Wilderness; or, getting back to the wrong nature. https://www.williamcronon.net/writing/Trouble_with_Wilderness_Main.html
DavidSuzukiFDN. (2012, July 20). David Suzuki and Richard Louv @AGO [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5DI1Ffdl6Y&t=5s
Hooykaas, A. (2024). Unit 08: The Role of Technology in Nature Interpretation. CourseLink. https://courselink.uoguelph.ca/d2l/le/content/898489/viewContent/3863610/View
Rodenburg, J. (2019, June 17). Why Environmental Educators Shouldn’t Give Up Hope. Clearing Magazine. https://clearingmagazine.org/archives/14300
Wals, A. E. J., Brody, M., Dillon, J., & Stevenson, R. B. (2014). Convergence between science and
environmental education. Science, 344(6184), 583–584. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1250515