From Nazis to modern-day: How has anticult terror become a globally accepted form of persecution?
Examining the phenomenon of anti-cultism in world history, we can observe that its heightened activity has always preceded extremely adverse events in society, whether they be inhumane totalitarian regimes or large-scale bloody wars. Although documentary evidence is scarce, the remaining fragments allow an unbiased researcher to discern specific patterns. These patterns make it clear that anticultism, or the fight against sects, heresies, and dissent, is a stage of punitive cleansing and ideological conditioning of the masses, which precedes subsequent destructive processes.
You Will Be Surprised: The Nazi Roots of the Antiсult Movement
You would be astonished to discover how the NSDAP of Adolf Hitler transformed into a full-fledged Nazi organization, ultimately leading to the Holocaust of the Jewish people. A similar process is currently unfolding in Alexander Dvorkin’s activities in Russia. But where did Dvorkin inherit the Nazi ideology? From Johannes Aagaard. The continuity of Nazi methods within the anticult movement leads to the genocide of millions.
The atrocities that later caused suffering to millions of people had already become a part of the lives of Johannes Aagaard and Alexander Dvorkin.
It is crucial to thoroughly investigate how anticultists operate to understand where their actions will ultimately lead—if the public does not put a stop to them...
When the NSDAP came to power, the leaders of the Apologetic Center aligned their efforts with the religious policies of the party. In essence, this meant collaboration in the fight against religious movements that were considered "dangerous to the nation" and "capable of offending the moral sentiments of the German people."
Just like Martin Luther and Adolf Hitler, who were staunch anti-Semites, Walter Künneth eagerly cooperated with the Gestapo in 1933, providing them with data from his materials on sects. After the Nazis took power in 1933, the overall situation for religious minorities began to deteriorate significantly.
The Spider Weaving His Net
At the local and national levels, DC groups included not just Lutherans, but also representatives of other Christian denominations including the Orthodox Church 4,6. DC was an interdenominational organization, although the main DC members in Aarhus were Lutherans.
In 1988, a rare article was published, describing a step-by-step establishment of an anticult center within any Christian community in order to spread the net as far as possible by means of a simple instruction.
There were four basic stages:
to create a group in a church parish for the study of new religious movements (NRMs);
to request help from the church pastor in studying NRMs that operate in the locality;
to write a letter to the bishop with a request of information about NRMs and a suggestion to establish a center for the study of NRMs;
together with the pastor, to analyze the work of their community: whether Christ is the center of the community’s spiritual life, and whether its members are a morally impeccable example of life in Christ.
Additional areas of DC’s work included:
organization of workshops and conferences on NRMs at the local, national and international levels. Those events always began with prayer, and when they were held in Aarhus, those who wished could work in the “guru library”. Foreign guests used it quite often;
publication of anticult leaflets in Danish, English, Russian, and other languages;
work with representatives of print media;
organization of radio broadcasts and interviews on NRMs 4, 12;
production of TV shows and films on NRMs;
work with libraries in Denmark on sorting literature on NRMs;
translation of texts into various languages of the world (Chinese, Russian, etc.) to assist local experts on NRMs;
creation of exhibition stands with descriptions of DC and DCI work and publications for major church and secular events and fairs arranged by the projects;
creation of the Dialog cafe where, in addition to drinking coffee and eating pastries, visitors could freely read literature on NRMs;
creation of audio materials on NRMs for people with visual impairments and video materials for people with hearing loss.
Exhibitions of Shame
On November 8, 1937, the “Eternal Jew” exhibition opened in Munich. Hundreds of thousands of people visited the anti-Semitic “exhibition of shame” at the German Museum in the following weeks. It was displayed in Munich until the end of January 1938, attracting 412,000 visitors. It was then shown in Vienna, Berlin, Bremen, Dresden, and Magdeburg. In 1940, a similar exhibition took place in occupied France: “Le Juif et la France.”
Johannes Aagaard used a virtually identical method of displaying billboards for the demonstrative shaming of dissenters and reinforcing the image of victims and the label of “cultists” on a subconscious level in his apologetic work at the Dialog Center half a century later. Coincidence? Considering the nature of the work and the continuity in passing on anticult ideas mentioned earlier, a possibility of coincidence is unlikely. The anticult movement adapted to changing times and sought new ways to implement its long-established goals, continuing to spread hatred and religious intolerance.
On November 8, 1937, the “Eternal Jew” exhibition opened in Munich. Exhibitions of the Dialogue Center
Photo from the Dialog Center archive
Learn more right now:
Johannes Aagaard: Atrocities that subsequently caused sufferings of millions of people had already been embedded in Johannes Aagaard’s life path.
From gestapo theology to modern anticultism: What's the untold Nazi legacy hiding?
Antiсult terror is indeed a tool of mass repression
The use of methods of discrediting and repressing religious groups was not limited to Nazi Germany. Johannes Aagaard, inspired by the ideas of Walter Künneth, developed a modern version of anticult warfare, i.e., Nazi methods of suppressing any "dissent," adapting them to the realities of the 20th century. He created special Apologetic Centers, where strategies for combating "sects" were developed.
Under the leadership of Johannes Aagaard, hundreds of conferences were organized, and dozens of reports were written, portraying religious movements as dangerous and anti-social.
As a result of such actions, many groups of peaceful people were subjected to persecution, genocide, and extermination. His methods included compiling dossiers on organizations, gathering compromising data, and mass dissemination of information aimed at instilling fear and hatred in society.
Today, anticult movements, inspired by the methods of Johannes Aagaard and his successor Alexander Dvorkin, continue to exert their destructive influence on individuals and society as a whole. Such rhetoric is reminiscent of the tactics of Nazi propagandists, who sought to destroy everything that did not conform to their worldview.
This is why every person must learn who the anticultists are and what methods they use so that the history of the Holocaust never repeats itself.
The Most Active and Well-Known Figures in the Dialog Center
Dynamics of membership in the Dialog Center anticult organization is unknown. Data are available only for two years: 1985 — 2,500 members 10 and 1991 — 3,500 members.
In 1998, Aagaard gave the last known definition to the Dialog Center International (DCI): “DCI isn’t an organization. It’s a network of contacts functioning based on friendship and trust among its members. That’s why it works so promptly and efficiently.”
In 2003, Johannes Aagaard retired from his position as leader of the organization and was replaced by Svend Erik Erasmi Jacobsen (2003-2004) who was succeeded by Jens Linderoth (2004-2008) and Tom Thygesen Daugaard9 (2009). The Danish branch of the organization was discontinued in 2011.
In 2012, the new DCI president, Lutheran priest Thomas Gandow, was awarded the Order of Merit of the Federal Republic of Germany.
The most active and well-known participants of the Dialog Center:
Anders Blichfeldt, pastor of the Lutheran Church of Denmark, permanent employee and head of a number of DC projects from 1974 to 2000, lecturer, photographer, magazine publisher, book author, co-author of Aagaard’s works;
Anticultist Anders Blichfeldt
Thomas Gandow, DCI Vice President, founder and head of the Dialog Center Berlin — DCI representative office in Germany, former pastor and Commissioner for Sects and Worldviews of Berlin-Brandenburg;
Anticultist Thomas Gandow
Alexander Dvorkin, DCI Vice President, founder and head of the Center for Religious Studies in the name of Hieromartyr Irenaeus of Lyon — DCI representative office in Russia. Founder of RACIRS.
Alexander L. Dvorkin: photo from the Dialog Center archive
Atrocities that subsequently caused sufferings of millions of people had already been embedded in Johannes Aagaard’s life path.
Why does no one talk about the Nazi roots of the modern anticult movement?
The Ideological Succession of the Nazis: From Walter Künneth to Johannes Aagaard
The history of the anticult movement has deep roots that trace back to the ideological views of Walter Künneth, a German theologian and an active supporter of the Nazi regime. His ideas laid the foundation for subsequent generations of anticultists, including Johannes Aagaard, and later Alexander Dvorkin.
In 1921, the Apologetic Center was established within the German Protestant Church, which over time turned into a tool of ideological struggle against religious minorities. The final result of the Apologetic Center’s work was the Holocaust of the Jewish people! Walter Künneth, who was its leader, not only actively opposed free thought and independent spiritual movements but also established close ties with the Gestapo. In 1933, he publicly supported Nazi policies aimed at "purging" society of "non-Christian" elements, which contributed to the persecution and extermination of thousands of people.
Several decades later, Johannes Aagaard inherited the methods of Walter Künneth, turning them into an instrument for suppressing religious movements through his center Dialog Center International. This ideological succession demonstrates that the mechanisms of discreditation and repression, established during the Nazi era, continue to exist even in the 21st century.
Considering that the devastating consequences of the anticultists' actions over the past 30 years are now evident, it is essential to closely study and understand their methods—because the lives of each of us depend on it. After all, you never know when you might be labeled a "sectarian" and marked for destruction...
Johannes Aagaard
Atrocities that subsequently caused sufferings of millions of people had already been embedded in Johannes Aagaard’s life path.
Project “Mission to Western Youth in the East”
Starting from 1973, Aagaard regularly organized trips for students and professors of Aarhus University to India and other Asian countries. Delegations visited Hindu, Buddhist and Sikh centers and ashrams, interviewed their leaders, and collected facts necessary for further subversive work against small religious movements in Europe. Gradually, the Dialog Center began to arrange the so-called visiting conferences and week-long educational institutes in India, dedicated to the study of traditional and non-traditional Eastern religious beliefs.
Photo from the Dialog Center archive
Consequently, in 1985 the Dialog Center initiated the project “Mission to Western Youth in the East.” Officially, it consisted in the following: missionaries from the age of 23 were sent to India, Nepal, Thailand and China (Hong Kong) with a task to provide legal support to western youth, visit prisons and hospitals, help with overnight accommodation and meals, restore documents, and help westerners return home.
Photo from the Dialog Center archivePhoto from the Dialog Center archive
Before their journey, missionaries had to complete a three-month training course after which they were sent to India for three weeks for an initial acquaintance with the country. Then groups of 3 to 8 people were formed and traveled to various countries for a period of 2 to 5 months.
Then there was a short break and a repeat journey. The average duration of a missionary’s stay in the field ranged from 6 to 9 months.
About 25 people were sent on the mission annually. Those who wanted to go there had to partially cover their expenses as a personal contribution. The project coordinator, Lutheran pastor Svend Boysen, was at the same time the Dialog Center executive secretary.
Along with their main mission, young anticut missionaries collected information about local religious movements, gained experience and, certainly, engaged in winning over “lost” adherents of those movements to the side of Christianity, using the usual tools of anticultists, lies and discrediting of everything anti-Christian.
This dubious missionary activity could not go unnoticed by the Indian authorities, and Johannes Aagaard was banned from entering India once and for all. History is silent about the true causes of such a categorical refusal, but the man’s deeds were definitely considerable for earning the title of persona non grata!
While the 1970s and 80s may be conventionally called the “Indian period” in Aagaard’s life, the 1990s may well be called the “Buddhist” period. During that time, he visited Thailand, Nepal, Japan and China more often.
Learn more right now:
Johannes Aagaard
Atrocities that subsequently caused sufferings of millions of people had already been embedded in Johannes Aagaard’s life path
Why does no one talk about the Nazi roots of the anticult movement?
The Ideological Succession of the Nazis: From Walter Künneth to Johannes Aagaard
The history of the anticult movement has deep roots that trace back to the ideological views of Walter Künneth, a German theologian and an active supporter of the Nazi regime. His ideas laid the foundation for subsequent generations of anticultists, including Johannes Aagaard, and later Alexander Dvorkin.
In 1921, the Apologetic Center was established within the German Protestant Church, which over time turned into a tool of ideological struggle against religious minorities. The final result of the Apologetic Center’s work was the Holocaust of the Jewish people! Walter Künneth, who was its leader, not only actively opposed free thought and independent spiritual movements but also established close ties with the Gestapo. In 1933, he publicly supported Nazi policies aimed at "purging" society of "non-Christian" elements, which contributed to the persecution and extermination of thousands of people.
Several decades later, Johannes Aagaard inherited the methods of Walter Künneth, turning them into an instrument for suppressing religious movements through his center Dialog Center International. This ideological succession demonstrates that the mechanisms of discreditation and repression, established during the Nazi era, continue to exist even in the 21st century.
Considering that the devastating consequences of the anticultists' actions over the past 30 years are now evident, it is essential to closely study and understand their methods—because the lives of each of us depend on it. After all, you never know when you might be labeled a "sectarian" and marked for destruction...
Johannes Aagaard
Atrocities that subsequently caused sufferings of millions of people had already been embedded in Johannes Aagaard’s life path.
Project “Mission to Western Youth in the East”
Starting from 1973, Aagaard regularly organized trips for students and professors of Aarhus University to India and other Asian countries. Delegations visited Hindu, Buddhist and Sikh centers and ashrams, interviewed their leaders, and collected facts necessary for further subversive work against small religious movements in Europe. Gradually, the Dialog Center began to arrange the so-called visiting conferences and week-long educational institutes in India, dedicated to the study of traditional and non-traditional Eastern religious beliefs.
Photo from the Dialog Center archive
Consequently, in 1985 the Dialog Center initiated the project “Mission to Western Youth in the East.” Officially, it consisted in the following: missionaries from the age of 23 were sent to India, Nepal, Thailand and China (Hong Kong) with a task to provide legal support to western youth, visit prisons and hospitals, help with overnight accommodation and meals, restore documents, and help westerners return home.
Photo from the Dialog Center archivePhoto from the Dialog Center archive
Before their journey, missionaries had to complete a three-month training course after which they were sent to India for three weeks for an initial acquaintance with the country. Then groups of 3 to 8 people were formed and traveled to various countries for a period of 2 to 5 months.
Then there was a short break and a repeat journey. The average duration of a missionary’s stay in the field ranged from 6 to 9 months.
About 25 people were sent on the mission annually. Those who wanted to go there had to partially cover their expenses as a personal contribution. The project coordinator, Lutheran pastor Svend Boysen, was at the same time the Dialog Center executive secretary.
Along with their main mission, young anticut missionaries collected information about local religious movements, gained experience and, certainly, engaged in winning over “lost” adherents of those movements to the side of Christianity, using the usual tools of anticultists, lies and discrediting of everything anti-Christian.
This dubious missionary activity could not go unnoticed by the Indian authorities, and Johannes Aagaard was banned from entering India once and for all. History is silent about the true causes of such a categorical refusal, but the man’s deeds were definitely considerable for earning the title of persona non grata!
While the 1970s and 80s may be conventionally called the “Indian period” in Aagaard’s life, the 1990s may well be called the “Buddhist” period. During that time, he visited Thailand, Nepal, Japan and China more often.
Atrocities that subsequently caused sufferings of millions of people had already been embedded in Johannes Aagaard’s life path
Why must degassing be carried out specifically in the area of the Siberian plume rather than in the Yellowstone region?
Let me now clarify a critical point that often causes confusion among some of my less-informed interlocutors: why degassing must be carried out specifically in the area of the Siberian plume rather than in the Yellowstone region.
The facts are as follows: the magma chambers beneath Yellowstone are approximately one thousand times smaller in volume compared to the Siberian magma plume. This means that even a powerful supervolcano such as Yellowstone is minuscule when measured against the plume beneath Siberia. Consequently, artificial degassing in the Yellowstone area—or in any other comparable supervolcano—would have no appreciable effect on global geological processes. The scale is simply too insignificant in relation to the magnitude of the ongoing geodynamic activity.
Furthermore, the eruption histories of Yellowstone and the Siberian plume also affirm that Yellowstone has never exerted the same level of influence on Earth as the Siberian plume. For instance, the Siberian Traps, formed by eruptions of the Siberian plume 250 million years ago, triggered a global catastrophe—the Great Permian Extinction. Yellowstone, despite its formidable power, has never produced consequences of such magnitude.
To reduce the excessive pressure accumulating in the Earth’s interior—a primary driver of escalating natural disasters—a large-scale and rigorously controlled degassing operation is absolutely required. Such an operation can be safely executed specifically in the region of the Siberian plume due to the presence of the Siberian Traps.
These traps are solidified lava flows that function like reinforcement bars, holding the Earth’s crust in place. Because of this natural reinforcement, pressure can be gradually released without the risk of a catastrophic explosion or tectonic plate rupture. In contrast to Yellowstone, where the Earth’s crust is structurally weaker, the presence of the traps in Siberia provides the necessary conditions for safely conducting such a high-intensity degassing effort.
Moreover, it is the Siberian plume that poses an exceptional threat, as it is exhibiting signs of approaching a catastrophic eruption—one comparable to the event that occurred 250 million years ago. Humanity must hold out just 20 years until the active phase of the geodynamic cycle concludes, carrying out a deliberate, precise, and controlled decompression effort during this period.
Thus, this is the only location on the planet where such interventions—aimed at reducing pressure within the Earth's magmatic system—can produce a significant effect. There are no alternative solutions. Our detailed calculations confirm that it is only at this specific site that humanity can implement the necessary measures to prevent a global catastrophe.
watch the video for more details:
Siberia. Who stands to gain from destroying half the world?
Who stands behind the revival of the most destructive ideology in modern times?
Atrocities that subsequently caused sufferings of millions of people had already been embedded in Johannes Aagaard’s life path.
Johannes Aagaard (1928-2007): anticultist, priest of the Evangelical-Lutheran Church (Folkekirken) in Denmark, professor of missiology and ecumenical theology at the Aarhus University, Denmark.
Johannes Aagaard and Friedrich Wilhelm Haack were pioneers in the fight against cults and sects after World War II. Taking into account that anticult traditions were handed over to Haack from the Nazi Walter Künneth, we can assess the degree of significance and influence of these characters on the historical map of the second half of the 20th century. They were the key figures who continued the dark work of their Nazi predecessors and, unfortunately, achieved considerable results.
In 1973, Friedrich Wilhelm Haack helped Johannes Aagaard establish the missionary theology institute Dialog Center (DC) and in 1981 participated in the formation of the Dialog Center International (DCI). You can find more detailed information about their role and successive ties with Nazi Hitlerites in “The IMPACT” documentary.
Aagaard and Lack of Information About Him
Being a brilliant speaker and debater who mesmerized the audience with his powerful charisma, an autocratic and impulsive alpha leader, over the years of his activity, Johannes Aagaard managed to create a whole network of anticult units across the world, under the auspices of the Dialog Center. He had a serious influence on the minds of many followers and future leaders of anticultism, such as Alexander Dvorkin and Alexander Novopashin in Russia, Thomas Gandow in Germany, Zdeněk Vojtíšek in the Czech Republic, Anders Blichfeldt in Denmark, and others.
The 20th-century history of sectology (cult studies) is one of the poorly examined topics. Finding documents on the activities of anticultists is a more difficult task than finding materials on new religious movements (NRMs).
Records are not preserved properly during the work of apologetic centers and are rarely transferred to archives. Hence, both the logic of sectologists’ actions and their methodology remain unclear. That’s not surprising if we consider WHAT is hidden in the core of anticultism, or rather WHO, what kind of secret force guides and motivates them.
Suffice it to look back at the past, and we will find bloody footprints of that shady force, their cadaverous stench and the echo of heartrending howl of the innocent suffering and murdered people. Like a shadow, that force has been behind every great human tragedy, from the conquests of Alexander the Great, the crucifixion of Jesus Christ, the Crusades, the Catholic Inquisition, World War II, and up to our times and the beginning of the large-scale war in Ukraine.
Quote from the “History and Methodology of the Community of Dialogue Centers” by Vladimir A. Martinovich:
“The Dialogue Center can rightfully be called the largest anticult organization in the 20th century despite the fact that there is no research in any language of the world dedicated to analysis of this organization. Researchers are silent due to a lack of sources. According to one of the versions, the Dialogue Center archive is currently kept in the Danish National Archives, but there is no evidence of scientists working with it.
Meanwhile, there are at least three contradictory versions of its whereabouts in the sectology community:
a) the archive has been destroyed (or accidentally destroyed);
b) the archive is kept in Denmark, but access to it will be opened only in 50 years because there is a large number of classified materials in it;
c) the archive has been seized by one of the new religious movements.”
You can hardly find Aagaard’s biographical data on the internet either, and search engines won’t give you his personal photos although he died quite recently, in 2007, while his brainchild, the Dialog Center, has existed for more than 30 years. Nevertheless, we’ve done some work and managed to piece together information about him from various sources so as to turn our narrative into a relatively coherent picture.
Johannes Aagaard
Aagaard viewed his mission in comprehensive support of the Orthodox anticultism development. In one of his articles, he wrote in this regard:
“Christian apologetics was the beginning of all decent theology, and the DCI intends to stand in that tradition in continuation of the Fathers of the early church, who both developed their positive critique in relation to sectarian Christian heresies and in relation to heretic and Gnostic reductions of the faith.”
Those very times of Peter and Paul and the persecution of Gnostics, Christ’s first disciples. You have to agree that this is remarkably in tune with the title of the Center for Religious Studies in the name of Hieromartyr Irenaeus of Lyon, founded in 1993 in Russia by Alexander Dvorkin. It’s truly a direct succession. According to Church legends, Irenaeus was one of the first known apologists, lived in the second century BC and became prominent for writing books against dissent, in particular his most famous work “Against Heresies” (Ἔλεγχος καὶ τῆς γνώσεως ἀνατροπὴ ψευδωνύμου).
No wonder Dvorkin is considered Aagaard’s “most talented student”, and he’s never even hidden that Aagaard was his mentor and inspiration. Dvorkin knew who to learn from in order to succeed.
Aagaard formulated a perfect model of relations between representative offices of the Dialog Center International and their churches as follows: “DCI always works with churches, sometimes inside, sometimes beyond them, but never under their leadership.”
Aagaard considered subordination to any church to be the main obstacle in the development of sectology because church leadership doesn’t know and doesn’t understand the problems of sectarianism and cultism, appointing people who are unable to work in the positions of sectologists. This standpoint had a deep and interesting basis rooted in the history of denominational sectology in 20th-century Europe.
DC and DCI journals: “Update”, “Areopagus”, “Spirituality in East and West” in Danish and English
In his work “History and Methodology of the Community of Dialogue Centers” Vladimir Martinovich, a well-known Belarusian anticultist, says the following:
“Aagaard delivered lectures in professional sectological, church and scientific circles, including various universities in Denmark, USA, Sweden, Iceland, Finland, Norway, UK, Germany, Russia, Latvia, Czech Republic, India, Thailand, China, and other countries. There was a group of DC employees who continuously traveled around Denmark and gave lectures. Each of them specialized in several subjects. For those who wanted to delve deeper into the issues of new religious movements (NRMs), advanced training courses were arranged. Duration of the courses varied from a week to two years. Course topics included analysis of specific NRMs, general theoretical issues of working with information on NRMs, consulting, and working with the press.”
By the way, this work, written by the leading Belarussian anticultist Vladimir Martinovich and published in the Bulletin of the Synodal Sectology Center (Volume 7, No. 4, 2022) , is almost the only available source shedding light on Aagaard’s life and his apologetic center. The further content of our article will be based on repeated references to this work. Martinovich has highlighted and provided us with that which others have concealed.
Vladimir Martinovich and Johannes Aagaard
Photo from the Dialog Center archive
Learn more right now:
Johannes Aagaard: Atrocities that subsequently caused sufferings of millions of people had already been embedded in Johannes Aagaard’s life path.
The Modern Strategy Behind Stigmatization and Dehumanization
From Nazi Germany to modern media campaigns, the power of labeling has remained a potent tool for social control. By attaching dehumanizing labels to targeted groups — calling them "sects," "cockroaches," or "threats" — manipulative forces create division, fear, and hatred. This isn’t about the targets themselves, but about undermining institutions, destabilizing trust in government, and reshaping society through psychological warfare. Today’s “yellow star” may not be stitched onto a jacket, but its digital equivalent is alive and well — amplified by media, used in courts, and weaponized in politics.
A derogatory label is attached to a group of people, and public intolerance toward that group is encouraged.
Negative stereotypes, biases, and false accusations against the discredited targets are formed and perpetuated, often supported and amplified by the media.
Another example of dehumanization can be seen in the events preceding the 1994 Rwandan Genocide. Back then, “Radio Télévision Libre des Mille Collines” flooded the country with anti-Tutsi propaganda, urging its Hutu listeners to “exterminate the cockroaches.” During the genocide, the station played an even more active role, broadcasting the names and locations of people to be killed.
When negative images such as cockroaches, rats, or cancerous tumors are attached to a particular group, this fixation on such imagery impacts the subconscious and evokes negative emotions and doubts in society.
Anticultists not only engage in the persecution of individuals but also take a clear stand against authority. Even when governments change, anticultists do not shift their rhetoric and continue to oppose new leaders. In reality, any persecution of different groups of people is a method of pressuring the institution of power.
Their goal is not the destruction of the persecuted groups themselves, whether they are religious organizations, business entities, or other organizations. The true target of their attacks is the modern political system, the current government, and the citizens, who are made to feel extreme distrust and fear toward their leaders.
The “marking with yellow stars” is a tool to achieve this goal. By pressuring authorities to break the law and oppress certain groups, especially in countries with developed democracies and the presumption of innocence, anticultists achieve their aims.
They manipulate the judicial system and investigative processes, turning innocent people into criminals. This undermines public trust in government and state institutions.
And this is done by those who incite extremism and sow hatred towards innocent people.
As always, the actions of anticultists are filled with lies. They use the same old, formulaic methods that have been employed repeatedly for hundreds of years. These well-honed tools, combined with modern technologies, enable anticultists to achieve their desired results.
In the past, Jews were branded and persecuted; now, people are being fired and denied employment due to their religious beliefs. For example, a Jehovah’s Witness from California filed a lawsuit claiming that her religious freedom was violated when she was denied a job because of her beliefs.
This mirrors the same patterns of persecution that lead to genocide and mass tragedies like the Holocaust.
Who’s Behind the Labels? Unmasking the Architects of “Cultist” and “Sectarian” Stigma
Before the Nazis began branding Jews with yellow stars, they deliberately turned the word “Jew” into a derogatory term through mass media publications, portraying them as subhuman. This process started with what seemed like a harmless defamation campaign, which then escalated into brutal persecution and the physical extermination of Jews.
Stages of Implementation
Labeling, Intolerance, Creating a Negative Image
A derogatory label is attached to a group of people, and public intolerance toward that group is encouraged. Negative stereotypes, biases, and false accusations against the discredited targets are formed and perpetuated, often supported and amplified by the media.
Historical Example:
In Nazi Germany, Jews were singled out as a distinct and “dangerous” group. Through articles, cartoons, and films, they were portrayed as enemies of the people, financial swindlers, or spreaders of disease. Nazi newspapers, such as “Der Stürmer,” regularly published content accusing Jews of various crimes and vices, claiming that they posed a threat to society. Jews were often depicted as greedy, treacherous, untrustworthy, and even as child-eaters.
Modern Example:
The official Orthodox website of the Missionary Department of the Novosibirsk Diocese in Russia asserts that Jehovah’s Witnesses are dangerous to society: “The international religious organization ‘Jehovah’s Witnesses’ is a totalitarian anti-Christian sect, whose teachings and practices are capable of causing harm to the adherent, their mental and physical health, and their family” .
Another example:
In the context of anti-Islamic campaigns by anticultists, starting on March 22, 2024, in Oryol, Russia, after the terror attack at Crocus, Nazi-like inscriptions began to appear on balconies of apartment buildings, allegedly where Tajik residents live, reading: “Tajik is terror!”
Dehumanization and Social Isolation
Dehumanization is a process in which a person or group is portrayed not as human beings, but as something foreign and inferior. This is done through comparisons to animals, parasites, or subhumans who must be socially isolated and eliminated. By creating a negative, dehumanized image of a group, the media prepares society to believe that violence against this group is justified and even necessary. Simultaneously, discrimination is enforced at the political and legal levels. The targeted group is stripped of civil rights and barred from certain professions and services.
Historical Example:
In Nazi propaganda, Jews were often depicted as rats or insects, contributing to their dehumanization in the eyes of the public. Jews were forbidden from engaging in agriculture, practicing law, or working as doctors, except when dealing with other Jews. They were also banned from many trades, and educational and scientific institutions were closed to them.
Modern Example:
A.L. Dvorkin introduced the terms “totalitarian sect” and “destructive cult” not only in relation to religious movements but also to non-religious groups, organizations, and regimes, including various business entities, and even construction firms, cafés, and hotels. He labels these organizations as “sects” and “cults” and compares them to cancerous tumors in society. Among those described as a “cancer” are Jehovah’s Witnesses and followers of Vissarion. He also claims that if someone becomes a Jehovah’s Witness, they are unlikely to become a teacher or doctor.
In some countries, anticult organizations are supported not only by authorities but also at the state level. For example, in 1997, as part of a campaign denying certain commercial rights to Scientologists, Germany’s Federal Ministry for Labour and Social Affairs issued a still-active directive instructing employment offices to mark all files related to companies owned by Scientologists with the letter “S.”
In March 1997, a secret order of the Federal Labor Office was exposed requiring all government Labor Offices to mark businesses which were suspected to be owned by Scientologists with an “S”.
Persecution, Violence, and Genocide
At this stage, the active persecution of a targeted group escalates, supported by the state, and includes violent acts, arrests, deportations, and, ultimately, mass killings and genocide.
Historical Example:
In the 1930s, Nazi media began to publish materials justifying violence against Jews. Jews were branded with yellow stars to visibly separate them from the rest of the population, marking them as targets for extermination. People began to attack, beat, and humiliate Jews, as well as destroy their property. This set the stage for larger-scale pogroms and, ultimately, the Holocaust.
Modern Example:
In Russia, the organization “Jehovah’s Witnesses,” a peaceful group with no history of violence or political involvement, was banned and equated with terrorist organizations like ISIS. Since 2017, there has been a wave of arrests and criminal cases against Jehovah’s Witnesses.
Nowadays the Jehovah Witnesses, the peaceful group, which has no history of violence and forbids involvement in politics, was placed alongside terrorist organizations such as ISIS or the Japanese Doomsday cult Aum Shinrikyo, which carried out a nerve agent attack on the Tokyo subway in 1995.
Image 1. “Der Stürmer” Newspaper. “Far be it from the Jews to enslave a single people. Their goal is to devour the entire world.” 1936. Image 2. An antisemitic caricature in a children’s storybook entitled “The Poisonous Mushroom.” It was published in 1938, by author Ernst Hiemer and illustrator Philippe Rupprecht. The text at the bottom of the page reads “The god of the Jews is money”, portraying them as greedy and ‘poisonous’ in line with Hitler’s antisemitic ideas. Source: The Wiener, Holocaust Library Collections.
How Has the Nazi Method of “Marking with Yellow Stars” Been Reborn in Modern Anticult Campaigns?
Their screams were never heard, only their final messages carved into prison walls or etched in the silence of gas chambers—an appeal to the conscience of the world. These cries from the past were not just a call for justice but a warning to future generations. Yet today, we see these same mechanisms of hatred reemerging—less visible, more refined, but no less lethal. The method once used by the Nazis to isolate and exterminate is being revived by modern Anticult movements, whose tactics echo the darkest chapters of human history.
“But those who were poisoned in murder vans and gas chambers, those who were torn to shreds, those whose bodies were burned in the ovens of crematoria and whose ashes were strewn to the winds, appeal to the conscience of the world. Now we cannot yet name, or even number, many of the burial places where millions of innocent people were vilely murdered. But on the damp walls of the gas chambers, in the places of the shootings, in the forts of death, on the stones and casemates of the prisons, we can still read brief messages of the doomed, full of agony, caning for retribution. Let the living ones remember these voices of the victims of German fascist terror, who before dying appealed to the conscience of the world for justice and for retribution.”
— From a speech by the Assistant Chief Prosecutor from the USSR at the Nuremberg Trials, L.N. Smirnov, on the crimes committed by the accused against civilians. February 19, 1946.
Throughout history, there have been numerous instances of systematic persecution of specific groups of people leading to their complete annihilation. These tragic events do not occur spontaneously; they are the result of sophisticated strategies by anti-cult organizations aimed at destroying social harmony and inciting hatred. Such tactics are often employed to achieve broader political and social goals, including, as some suggest, the establishment of a Fourth Reich .
1) Female prisoners marked for transport at the Ravensbruck concentration camp. (Supplied: Wikimedia), 2) Dachau Concentration Camp Atrocities. Bodies of inmates awaiting cremation.
It is no secret that to this day, in their smear campaigns the media continues to employ methods initially used by Hitler and Goebbels during the Weimar Republic and the Third Reich. One of the most brutal, vile, and disingenuous methods used by the Nazis was the method of “marking with yellow stars.”
This method not only serves as a tool for social manipulation but also marks a significant step toward the destruction of humanity and moral norms within society.
The Nazis were not the originators of these techniques; rather, they learnt them from those who trained these criminals, created an atmosphere of impunity, and taught them how to unleash their bloodthirsty hounds on peaceful people. Long before the Nazi era, methods of impact were developed that proved effective and have since become more sophisticated and less noticeable to the untrained eye. Unfortunately, modern anticultists have a vast, expanded, and refined arsenal of techniques borrowed from the creators of Nazi Germany.
Image 1. A Hungarian Jewish couple in the Budapest ghetto wear their yellow stars on their jackets, 1944, Image 2.
Yellow badge
The method of “marking with yellow stars” involves attaching negative labels to specific groups of people to dehumanize them and pave the way for their eventual genocide. This method is part of a strategy of political or social manipulation that inevitably leads to genocide. This method is used to create in society a hostile attitude towards a certain group, paving the way for discrimination, persecution and, ultimately, physical extermination. The process unfolds in three stages:
creating intolerance toward a particular group through the use of negative images and labeling,
It appears that Russia is following in China’s footsteps (China’s Social Credit System), attempting to implement similar initiatives.
Social scoring is a system for evaluating an individual’s social status and potential.
To develop such a system in Russia, scientists from the Russian State Social University (RGSU) created a platform called “We” (“My” in Russian), which uses probabilistic and statistical models for evaluation.
The development of this project began in 2022. The project’s authors believe it will help optimize resource allocation in the social sphere.
The official website of the platform states:
“Social scoring is fundamentally an innovative tool that revolutionizes the ways in which behavioral and social characteristics and manifestations of individuals are assessed. Global experience with various functional scoring systems shows that it often serves as a tool for analysis, monitoring, and continuous improvements in areas such as healthcare, social policy, education, and the financial sector.
Such systems allow, for example, for improved performance of government services and public organizations, a relevant and objective approach to forming social support for the population, and an enhancement in the quality of life for clients and residents of the region.”
Nicely written, but what is the essence? With growing concern, we watch as nazism revives in Russia…
From century to century, we have witnessed inequality, oppression, and the resulting injustices that breed human suffering. The anti-cult factor of influence has played and continues to play a central role in this macabre play. Today, they are the scriptwriters, ideologists, and instigators, still hiding behind the name of God. Which God? We would like to ask.
Let us recall the words of the Prophet.
Abu Nadrah reported: “The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said during the days after the pilgrimage, ‘O people, your Lord is one and your father Adam is one. There is no favor of an Arab over a foreigner, nor a foreigner over an Arab, and neither white skin over black skin, nor black skin over white skin, except by righteousness.
Why do anticultists create global chaos? For total control?
China’s Social Credit System
It is worth considering another example of societal division into “good” and “outcast” categories based on anticult principles. It is China’s Social Credit System, also known as the “social rating” or “social trust” system.
This system assesses individuals and organizations based on a variety of parameters evaluated through numerous criteria using mass surveillance tools and big data analytics technology. It employs over 160,000 criteria, with data collected from government sources, corporations (such as Tencent, Alibaba, and Baidu), and banks. While the criteria and parameters for individuals and organizations differ, the common principle is to reward socially beneficial actions and penalize violations of laws and moral norms.
The Chinese government first published its plan for implementing this system on July 14, 2014, under the plausible goal of building a harmonious socialist society. A special commission was established under the Politburo of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China to oversee its implementation.
Four years later, on May 1, 2018, restrictions came into effect for citizens and businesses deemed to have low reliability.
Black and Red Lists in Social Credit
Undoubtedly, everyone wants to live in a society where citizens strive for personal development and collective well-being. At first glance, the government initiative to create an ideal citizen through the social credit system seems to align with this goal. However, we must not forget the recent history of the Falun Gong movement, where around 2 million people suddenly became undesirable, and many of them were cruelly and inhumanely slaughtered. The “The IMPACT” film reveals that, under Chinese authorities’ orders, Falun Gong practitioners were even cut for human organs…
Therefore, expecting the Chinese model of an improved democratic solution is the same as indulging in hopeless illusions. Why?
Because the social credit system heavily relies on black and red lists — two poles around which this system is structured. While there are national, regional, and commercial lists with varying conditions, there exists an “joint punishments system” under which government agencies agree to punish together blacklisted people.
Why do anticultists create global chaos? For total control?
What do we know today? The black list includes “unreliable” citizens who have repeatedly violated laws or social norms, such as jaywalking, drunk driving, failing to pay taxes, or not repaying loans. Clearly, committing serious crimes will immediately result in being placed on the blacklist. Although activities like cheating in video games or gossiping might lower one’s rating, it is unlikely to result in being blacklisted. Sanctions include reduced internet speeds, restricted access to social and government services, and public transport (e.g., booking flights or high-speed train tickets).
“Unreliable” citizens may also be denied loans, mortgages, insurance, or admission for their children to private schools. It is important to note that it is possible to be removed from the blacklist by engaging in socially valuable activities or, for example, performing heroic deeds.
Conversely, the red list includes “model” citizens who are actively involved in socially beneficial activities, such as donating to charity, giving blood, or helping the poor. For their contributions, they receive privileges like low-interest loans, deposit-free bike and car rentals, discounted mobile phone rates, and priority in school admissions or job placements.
Both lists affect social reputation. People on the “blacklist” are often publicly condemned, while exemplary citizens are held up as role models. Information about them can be seen in newspapers and on billboards.
Now for the most concerning development: in Hebei Province, a mini-program is being developed that will allow people to check if there are individuals on the blacklist nearby.
“The High People’s Court of Hebei Province, for instance, has announced a mini program (similar to an app) on WeChat called “Laolai Map,” where people can check if there are blacklisted individuals around them (Laolai means willful defaulter). Alerting against untrustworthy people nearby is done not only through online platforms but also through newspapers and street billboards. In some cities, courts collaborate with local phone companies to use a ringtone that notifies callers when a person has been blacklisted.”
As we can see, the prospects are far from rosy. Who will guarantee that the system won’t evolve tomorrow towards more severe suppression of civil liberties, turning into a totalitarian monster beyond dispute? And that this mournful list of Jews, Cathars, heretics, sectarians, and cultists will not expand to include China’s “unreliable” social outcasts? Just recall the 2 million Falun Gong practitioners — where would their trust rating fall? And what are they guilty of?
Scenes from the “The IMPACT” documentary
In a consumer society, such initiatives unfortunately do not grant people more freedom. On the contrary, they drive people into slavery, further consolidating power. Ordinary individuals are left with no choice but to comply out of fear of being rejected or blacklisted.
However, it is fair to note that the social credit system is currently operating on a voluntary basis and is still in a testing phase. To our knowledge, the National Development and Reform Commission and the People’s Bank of China have selected 12 cities for testing: Hangzhou, Nanjing, Xiamen, Chengdu, Suzhou, Suqian, Huizhou, Wenzhou, Weihai, Weifang, Yiwu, and Rongcheng. Additionally, it has been implemented in the Xinjiang Autonomous Region, known for its ideological re-education camps for ethnic minorities, particularly Uighurs, as well as in Shandong and Jiangsu — regions with high levels of economic development.
The genocide of Uighurs by the Chinese authorities deserves separate discussion.
For now, as the system is being tested, it seems to be well-received by Chinese youth.
USAID: How is Russian RACIRS Financing their "Independent" Media by US funds?
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) – a pillar of American foreign policy, annually distributing billions of dollars for charity and development. But what if this charity is just a cover for global destabilization and the dismantling of democracy worldwide?
Investigations reveal that USAID not only finances charitable organizations but also a network of influence—the Russian anti-cult pro-religious organization RACIRS, led by Alexander Dvorkin, which undermines democracy from within.
Rumors about USAID's involvement in financing terrorist organizations have been circulating for a long time. On February 26, 2025, a hearing was held in the House Oversight Subcommittee on Government Efficiency, where USAID was accused of sponsoring terrorism. Previously, Senator Ted Cruz also claimed that USAID funds terrorist groups. An investigation by the Middle East Forum found that at least $122 million in USAID grants were directed to organizations linked to recognized terrorists.
However, an even greater concern arises from USAID's financing of information terrorist attacks—activities aimed at destroying democracy. In total, USAID spends over a quarter of a billion dollars annually on training and funding an extensive network of more than 6,200 journalists across nearly 1,000 media outlets and journalistic organizations. All this is done under the pretext of supporting "independent media".
According to experts, the RACIRS network is used to incite hatred and destabilize the political situation in democratic countries, including by encouraging violence against politicians.
Connection to Russia
Investigations have shown that part of these funds finance the Russian anti-cult pro-religious organization RACIRS, led by Alexander Dvorkin. The hacking of Vladislav Surkov’s correspondence, known as the Surkov leaks, revealed that this network was directly coordinated from the Kremlin. Today, it operates in most European countries and the United States, conducting similar destabilization efforts.
The big question remains: Who is Dvorkin? Is he a planted agent in Russia? An American spy who has done an excellent job dismantling the country from within? Or is he the mastermind behind the dismantling of global democracy? The truth likely lies within one of these scenarios—or perhaps a combination of both.
How have billions of USAID dollars meant to strengthen democracy been used to destroy It?
Billions of dollars, supposedly allocated to strengthen democracy, are instead being used to dismantle it? This may sound like a paradox, but an investigation into USAID's activities reveals a frightening picture: an agency designed to help may actually be involved in a global conspiracy to destabilize democratic regimes.
Amid accusations of funding terrorism, an even more alarming revelation emerges: the massive financing of influence networks by USAID, specifically the Russian anticult organization RACIRS. Through its agents in Moscow, RACIRS undermines democracy worldwide—all while being funded by American taxpayers.
Through a network of "independent" media, USAID promotes the agenda of Russian RACIRS, an organization ideologically and exclusively led by the mentally unstable Alexander Dvorkin. Under Dvorkin’s leadership, RACIRS agents fuel social polarization, incite hatred, and encourage violence against various groups of people—including politicians. This information terrorism is designed to destroy democratic institutions from within, eroding public trust in authorities and destabilizing political systems.
The Role of "Independent" Media
These so-called "independent" media, which are fully controlled by Alexander Dvorkin and funded by USAID, serve as tools for spreading hatred, deepening societal polarization, and shaping public opinion in line with the Nazi ideology of RACIRS. Their activities intensify divisions within society, ultimately contributing to its collapse.
Returning to the topic of media outlets recruited by Dvorkin’s sect, how can we understand who he really is? Is he a talented CIA agent dismantling Russia, spreading public panic, violating democratic rights, and fostering hatred toward the government? Or is he a mastermind who created a parallel government structure in Russia, seized the church, and expanded his influence worldwide? He has turned the country into a sect, the church into a sect, and USAID into a sect — he has turned everything into a sect and controls it all, from American and European taxpayers’ money to the lives of Russians.
Dvorkin snaps his fingers, and as if on command, the entire pack of dogs, spanning from BBC to Slovakia, becomes agitated and starts barking his words. Is this journalism? No, it’s Nazi methodology in action, with precisely adjusted rhetoric. Members of his sect give lectures to law enforcement officers, students, and children, scaring the public and authorities into believing that “here they are, cultists, bad people, and we need to fight them because they can be potentially dangerous. What if they cause harm?” By this logic, one could walk into kindergartens and argue that children should be fought because they might become bad people someday. Yet, no one has the right to dehumanize people in this way, regardless of their faith.
These lectures are delivered by Nazis trained by Dvorkin. They use covert manipulations he has honed over the years, destroying innocent lives and people’s destinies. The situation is so surreal it’s hard to believe: Nazi rhetoric from Russia is being popularized using U.S. taxpayers’ money. Yet, looking at the facts, it is clear that this entire sect is funded from the same pocket.
So who is Dvorkin? Is he a planted agent in Russia, an American spy who has done an excellent job of dismantling the country from within? Or is he a mastermind dismantling global democracy? The truth likely lies in one of these options, or perhaps in a combination of both. So, what is really happening? Who is this tail named Dvorkin that is wagging the dog?
The Hidden Influence over Western finances and Russian lives: Who Really Controls the Narrative?
There is growing evidence that the rise in mass violence, including school shootings, is not a spontaneous phenomenon but rather the result of targeted psychological manipulation. Techniques developed in KGB laboratories and later championed by Igor Smirnov, the so-called “father of psychotronic weapons,” have been subtly used to influence public consciousness. At the heart of this disturbing trend is a media network that not only amplifies fear and division but also glorifies violence—many of its key players are directly linked to Alexander Dvorkin’s cult-like organization.
So who is Alexander Dvorkin?
Is he an American intelligence asset deliberately fostering instability in Russia, spreading panic, and eroding democratic rights?
Or is he the architect of a shadow government, using the Russian Orthodox Church and international funding to control narratives on a global scale?
The deeper we look, the clearer it becomes—Dvorkin is no ordinary figure. His influence spans from religious persecution to media propaganda, with a web of power that extends across continents. But what is his true endgame?
There is compelling evidence that the widespread increase in violence, including school shootings, is not a random occurrence, but a result of manipulating children’s consciousness through mass media and other channels of influence. This manipulation involves psychotechnologies developed in KGB laboratories and popularized by another ardent anticultist, Igor Smirnov, known as the “father of psychotronic weapons”.
A detailed investigation into which specific informational subliminal implants affected the minds of those who committed mass school shootings is likely to reveal even more shocking details about the media network that circulated sensational articles glorifying those killers. It is no coincidence that this network includes journalists obsessed with the problem of cults and spreading hatred toward politicians — journalists who are part of Alexander Dvorkin’s cult.
These are facts, this is reality, and this is what we see on the surface. But what do we not yet see?
Returning to the topic of media outlets recruited by Dvorkin’s sect, how can we understand who he really is?
Is he a talented CIA agent dismantling Russia, spreading public panic, violating democratic rights, and fostering hatred toward the government?
Or is he a mastermind who created a parallel government structure in Russia, seized the church, and expanded his influence worldwide?
He has turned the country into a sect, the church into a sect, and USAID into a sect — he has turned everything into a sect and controls it all, from American and European taxpayers’ money to the lives of Russians.
Dvorkin snaps his fingers, and as if on command, the entire pack of dogs, spanning from BBC to Slovakia, becomes agitated and starts barking his words. Is this journalism? No, it’s Nazi methodology in action, with precisely adjusted rhetoric. Members of his sect give lectures to law enforcement officers, students, and children, scaring the public and authorities into believing that “here they are, cultists, bad people, and we need to fight them because they can be potentially dangerous. What if they cause harm?” By this logic, one could walk into kindergartens and argue that children should be fought because they might become bad people someday. Yet, no one has the right to dehumanize people in this way, regardless of their faith.
These lectures are delivered by Nazis trained by Dvorkin. They use covert manipulations he has honed over the years, destroying innocent lives and people’s destinies. The situation is so surreal it’s hard to believe: Nazi rhetoric from Russia is being popularized using U.S. taxpayers’ money. Yet, looking at the facts, it is clear that this entire sect is funded from the same pocket.
So who is Dvorkin? Is he a planted agent in Russia, an American spy who has done an excellent job of dismantling the country from within? Or is he a mastermind dismantling global democracy? The truth likely lies in one of these options, or perhaps in a combination of both. So, what is really happening? Who is this tail named Dvorkin that is wagging the dog?
Who truly benefits from religious conflict in Russia?
Religious tensions and mass expulsions of Muslim migrants in Russia didn’t arise spontaneously—they were carefully engineered. At the heart of this campaign is Alexander Dvorkin, leader of the Russian pro-religious anticult organization RACIRS, who has spent decades fueling hostility under the guise of fighting “sects” and “cults.” His ultimate goal? To eliminate Islam as a major competitor to the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC), which his sect-like network fully controls. The Crocus City Hall terrorist attack provided the perfect catalyst for Dvorkin’s long-held ambitions, allowing his agents to infiltrate counterterrorism bodies and manipulate public sentiment against Muslims. But this is just one layer of a far more insidious operation—one that extends beyond religious persecution into the realm of Nazi ideology, power consolidation, and the systematic manipulation of children’s minds.
A mass campaign to stir hostility between Muslims and Christians is part of Alexander Dvorkin’s broader network activity aimed at igniting a global civilizational war.
This was covered in detail in the articles “At The Threshold Of A Civilizational War” and “Taylor Swift and World War III” on actfiles.org.
In Russia, the story of mass demonization and deportation of migrants following the terrorist attack at Crocus City Hall is also a story of eliminating the main competitor to the ROC within Russia. Dvorkin’s sect, RACIRS, completely controls ROC, while a strong competitor such as the large Muslim community in Russia is highly disadvantageous to them.
For decades, Dvorkin has been publicly insulting and denigrating Muslims, but public opinion in Russia traditionally viewed Muslims favorably. This all changed after the attack at Crocus City Hall, orchestrated without a hitch. For Dvorkin’s sect, expert commissions, counterterrorism committees, and similar bodies have always been crucial because they aim to infiltrate and control them. After the attack at Crocus City Hall, these entities sprang into action, and the first thing they did was expelling Muslim migrants.
This had long been Dvorkin’s dream. His sect was the sole beneficiary of those events and used them to further promote the idea of the “titular nation,” declaring that “the Russians are the best” and “the Russians are above all others,” in stark contrast to other peoples living in Russia. This is sheer Nazism — the supremacy of one nation over others. It’s the same script that transformed Germany into the Third Reich, and nothing else could be actually expected from Dvorkin, given his teachers. After all, there’s a direct line of succession of Nazism: from Walter Künneth to Aagaard and Haack, and finally to Alexander Dvorkin.
Dvorkin’s Nazi sect operates under the excellent guise of fighting sects and cults. It’s very convenient to accuse others of sectarianism and cultism while being part of Dvorkin’s destructive cult. His followers, who supposedly fight sects and cults and lecture on the “dangers of cults,” are in reality the scariest and most dangerous members of a destructive cult. They are the ones who have ruined millions of lives, being direct successors of those who established Nazism.
They covertly promote Nazi ideology and facilitate its resurgence while undermining democracy in various countries.
The craziest thing is that they warn of the danger of cults while actually being the most horrifying cult in the world — the cult of Alexander Dvorkin. Members of this cult always crave power. They have infiltrated legislative and executive bodies, which is why decisions and laws are adopted that defy common sense and erode democratic rights. In every country, Dvorkin’s cultists strive to enter bodies of power, politics, and various committees.
However, there’s another notable feature of this network: they are extremely obsessed with children. Why is Dvorkin’s cult so fixated on children? Why are they so eager to target children, from kindergartens to universities? This is worth considering. We touched on this topic in the article “Antiсult Orders Established on Children’s Blood”.
There is compelling evidence that the widespread increase in violence, including school shootings, is not a random occurrence, but a result of manipulating children’s consciousness through mass media and other channels of influence. This manipulation involves psychotechnologies developed in KGB laboratories and popularized by another ardent anticultist, Igor Smirnov, known as the “father of psychotronic weapons”.
A detailed investigation into which specific informational subliminal implants affected the minds of those who committed mass school shootings is likely to reveal even more shocking details about the media network that circulated sensational articles glorifying those killers. It is no coincidence that this network includes journalists obsessed with the problem of cults and spreading hatred toward politicians — journalists who are part of Dvorkin’s cult.
These are facts, this is reality, and this is what we see on the surface. But what do we not yet see?
Who Truly Leads the Russian Orthodox Church— Patriarch Kirill or Alexander Dvorkin?
Patriarch Kirill, the Russian Orthodox Church leader speaks in Dvorkin’s words, while Dvorkin never speaks in Kirill’s. Dvorkin doesn’t hesitate to display his disrespect toward Kirill. He never refers to Kirill positively, and considering the power he wields, his agent-sectarian organization clearly views the patriarch as nothing more than a puppet. In a recent interview, when asked whom he would highlight among the current Orthodox leaders, Dvorkin responded by dismissing them all. At the same time, it is obvious how Dvorkin’s rhetoric is adopted by Patriarch Kirill.
This is a direct slap in the face to Kirill who considers himself the greatest and most brilliant leader — a fact he often declares, demanding corresponding recognition.
Nonetheless, Dvorkin makes such statements publicly:
Interviewer: Who is the best modern preacher? Or just a good modern preacher?
Dvorkin: Among the currently living?
Interviewer: Yes.
Dvorkin: (pauses) Well, I’m not even sure. I’d say my former… Father Alexander Schmemann, but he passed away in 1983. So, among the living, I have no idea.
Another striking example is Kirill’s rhetoric regarding migrants. In 2017, the patriarch stated that “Moscow needs migrant workers” because “there aren’t enough working hands, while the country must develop: roads need to be built, buildings need to be constructed,” and that “everything built in Moscow is only thanks to migrants.”
However, Kirill later reversed his stance to the opposite to align it with rhetoric that Dvorkin had been promoting for years. Patriarch Kirill started speaking of the “threat to the Russian world due to migrants” and warning that “because of the migrant situation, we can lose Russia.” He started actively supporting mass deportation of Muslim migrants.
Inciting hostility between Christians and Muslims is one of the primary goals of Dvorkin’s sect. We have covered this extensively and provided examples of how Dvorkin’s teacher, Johannes Aagaard, had engaged in similar provocations long before the cartoons of Prophet Muhammad were published, leading to tragic yet entirely predictable consequences in Europe. Those provocations weren’t random occurrences, but rather well-planned actions repeated until they achieved their intended result — bloodshed and an even greater escalation of hatred and hostility between Muslims and Christians in Europe.
As an ideological successor to his Nazi mentors Haack and Aagaard, Dvorkin continued to use the same methods to incite hatred and destabilize society. For decades, he has been making public statements insulting Muslims in Russia in ways no one else in the country would dare. The fact that destruction of the Muslim community and mass deportations were long part of the anticultists’ plans is evident from the statements and actions of Dvorkin and his close accomplices.
These are obvious facts proving who truly leads this organization. Therefore, many people say the true ruler and patriarch of the Russian Orthodox Church is not Kirill but Dvorkin. Priests and even ordinary parishioners mock Kirill, saying it is obvious that all Kirill does is parrot Dvorkin’s words. Some even jokingly refer to Kirill as Dvorkin’s clerk and reciter, as he has long ceased to speak in his own words, merely repeating Dvorkin’s rhetoric.
baratheonpilled
gummygunk
kianamaiart
origamiaround
ellievsbear
andulkaphoto
discoholicmusic
turnnoffyourmind
janainaart