Imminence of Twilight - Shoko Okumura , 2019.
Japanese , b. 1983 -
Pigments, gold leaf on Japanese paper , 60 x 45 cm.
No title available
tumblr dot com
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
★

@theartofmadeline
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
cherry valley forever
Cosmic Funnies
The Bowery Presents
No title available
EXPECTATIONS
One Nice Bug Per Day
𓃗

#extradirty
h
No title available

blake kathryn
Noah Kahan
occasionally subtle
seen from Bangladesh
seen from United Arab Emirates
seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Germany
seen from Spain

seen from Malaysia

seen from Canada

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Venezuela
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Australia
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Bangladesh

seen from Iraq
@onescreamforsilence
Imminence of Twilight - Shoko Okumura , 2019.
Japanese , b. 1983 -
Pigments, gold leaf on Japanese paper , 60 x 45 cm.
Jovita Majewski (b.1987) - Stream. 2022. Oil on canvas.
"Alternating Currents" ∿ Ken Landon Buck
Leon Spilliaert, Beach Figures, 1928
Italian Stone Pine Tree, 1912
Encounter: the twin Imps of Sour Stomach and Headache
once I snorted a fat line of nuance and everything started depending. watch out
Saks Fifth Avenue, American Vogue, November 1981.
N.C. Wyteth. 1922. Endpaper.
Internet Archive
Her thoughts drifted with the slow current around her... , Darrel Rhea, 2023
⁺‧₊˚ bugs collection ˚₊‧⁺
Saezuru Has Always Been About Yashiro's Right to Self-Determination. Chapter 66 Might Threaten that Narrative:
I'm going to say this and I know it's going to piss some people off, but I really don't care. There's been some dismissive and downright insulting attitudes toward anyone who's dared to express disappointment with the latest chapter of Saezuru, and the worst part about it is, these dismissals in general fail entirely to understand what the criticism is even about. It isn't that anyone thinks Kamiya or Amou's words or actions are out of character or nonsensical, or that anyone is accusing Yoneda of bad writing. I certainly haven't and I haven't seen anyone else do so, either. The disappointment and the unease is coming from the potential for the latest chapter's developments to endorse a message which undercuts the entire dramatic journey of Yashiro's character. Now I'm not saying that's what's going to happen, only that the way the events unfolded in chapter 66 conveys a sense of it being a possibility.
I don't think I'm alone in having expected, after chapter 64, for Yashiro to come to the conclusion, on his own, that Doumeki still loves him, and that in itself being enough to convince him to spurn Misumi's orders, and to ignore the threat of Tsunakawa's retribution to go to Doumeki's side. That would have made plenty of sense with Yashiro's character, given his consistently self-sacrificial nature. Whenever anyone he's cared about in the past has been endangered, Yashiro has never failed to put himself on the line for their sake. So I don't think that was an unreasonable expectation to have. And it would have been the perfect culmination of Yashiro's self-actualization and a powerful statement about the importance of agency and self-determination. Instead, we got Yashiro being guilt-tripped into going to Doumeki's side, being treated by the other characters as if his trauma and reasons for pushing Doumeki away were both secondary to Doumeki's loyalty and, worse still, framed by the narrative as selfish in comparison to Doumeki's devotion. Now, I have no idea if that's what Yoneda is actually intending with the way things played out here, and given what an amazing writer she is, and how incredible this story has been up to this point, I'm going to say I doubt it, and I'm more than willing to wait and see what's actually going to happen before I pass judgement. But I still think it's fair to be unhappy with the turn things took in this chapter, and to be nervous about the potential turn the story might take if, say, there's no actual consequences to Yashiro's agency, once again, being undermined by the other characters in the story. If nothing negative happens as a result of all this, if Yashiro and Doumeki are able to simply ride off into the sunset together and live happily ever after, then the narrative is essentially pushing this idea that Doumeki was right for treating Yashiro the way he has since the start of the time skip, and that would be a serious problem, because Doumeki was never right for treating Yashiro the way he did, and in fact it wouldn't be any sort of exaggeration to call it emotional and mental abuse, and even sexual abuse. With Doumeki's confession at the end of chapter 64, we finally got acknowledgment on his part to that fact. That he's been mistreating Yashiro is a desperate attempt to hold onto him, and I assumed, as did others, that this was the moment when Doumeki finally understood that it's Yashiro, not him, who gets to decide if Doumeki gets to be in his life. It was the narrative highlighting the vital importance of Yashiro getting to make that choice on his own, and underscoring in the process the wrongness of Doumeki's behavior in trying to force himself into Yashiro's life. But now we've got a situation where Doumeki's devotion is possibly being framed as entitling him to Yashiro's love. Again, I'm not saying that's what happening, but it feels like that's what's happening with this latest chapter, and so it understandably upset some people who are particularly invested in Yashiro's journey toward self-realization.
I said this in a reply, but if Yashiro were a woman, people would be viewing the events of this chapter in a decidedly different light, I think. If Yashiro were a woman who had a history of sexual trauma and abuse, and who hadn't been allowed since the age of 19 to live for herself, then Amou's and Kamiya's words and actions would have come across as abusive and manipulative and controlling, all for the sake of a man who, let's face it, has shown stalker-levels of obsession with Yashiro. It would come across as creepy and also as undermining toward Yashiro's well-being and safety. It would be a bunch of men telling a woman that her safety is secondary and unimportant in the face of a man's feelings. Again, as I've repeated multiple times, we can't know how this is going to play out, but if nothing negative results from this, then the story is framing Doumeki's actions as "right" while framing Yashiro's actions as "wrong" and "selfish", and I would absolutely have a problem with that.
Because Yashiro never owed Doumeki his love. Doumeki's loyalty never has and never will entitle him to Yashiro's life. His actions toward Yashiro since the time skip have been manipulative and controlling, and there has to be some sort of price to pay for that. Doumeki shouldn't be rewarded for treating Yashiro like shit and lying to him because he couldn't accept Yashiro's rejection. The other characters telling Yashiro he's a terrible person and that he owes Doumeki his love because Doumeki loves him doesn't change that fact. If the narrative decides to frame Doumeki's actions as right, it won't change the fact that they were objectively wrong.
But like I've said, we'll have to wait and see if that's what's actually happening. I trust Yoneda enough not to undermine her own, central themes in an attempt to placate the fans who only seem interested in Yashiro's and Doumeki's love being consummated, regardless of how that consummation comes to fruition.
“Personally, I don't even believe Doumeki loves Yashiro.”
ngl i always felt uncomfortable that yashiro never consents when with doumeki but we were made to believe its ok as doumeki “loves” yashiro. we are made to believe doumeki “deserves” yashiro’s body for his devotion and because of how he’s been “treated” by yashiro. i felt his “love” post time skip felt more like he wanted to “crush” yashiro like men crush the one that rejected them, a pride thing. sexual violence fed to us under the guise of being ok because a man pined and loved? no thank you. i always go back to the first time doumeki forces yashiro to have sex with him, yashiro had flash back to his SA as a child. how can a romance be built on that sort of foundation?
First of all, thank you for sharing these thoughts with me. Up until now, my blog was almost exclusively in the form of pictures, short notes, and quotes. I’m not good at expressing myself through words, but I find this topic very important, and unfortunately, it is also quite close to me. That’s why at this point I’d like to take this answer as a sort of personal rant (for which I apologize), while addressing what you wrote, which I very, very much agree with.
When I first came across Saezuru, I was a young girl who didn’t yet know the extent of her own trauma, and it was also before I entered a relationship with my own "Doumeki." I always felt close to Yashiro; in fact, I’ve never seen myself more in a character. At the beginning, as a 17/18 yo girl, I somehow hoped that Doumeki saw some beauty in Yashiro, some purity, and that even though Yashiro is traumatized, deep down he longs for love and belonging. Naively, I thought that in the end, Doumeki would be a safe haven. Until I experienced rape at the hands of my own Doumeki in a long-term relationship, until I was confronted with the reality of what consent truly means and how someone can do these things to you while claiming they love you.
When that painful process of accepting that this had happened to me began (or that a person who has access to the most vulnerable parts of you can do this to you) I also saw a shift while reading the manga. I saw everything you wrote about. It hurt me when Yashiro, during the sexual act, said he was going to throw up, and how Doumeki replied that he was going to continue and didn’t care. Even in the latest chapter 66, Yashiro uses a word similar to "stalking" for D's action, while it’s clearly presented from a perspective that this is "coping" on Y's part because deep down he actually wants to be with D and D loves him.
Here, I think it's worth highlighting the fact that even if Yashiro loves Doumeki, even if somewhere deep down he wants his tenderness and love, that does not justify and does not excuse the violation of consent. Trauma responses are put in place for a reason, and any crossing of those boundaries is morally wrong, if not philosophically evil. Because Yashiro is a whole person, and because part of his autonomy is the decision that he does not want D close to him, that needs to be respected. Because he is a whole person, he can choose to sleep with other men, and yes, even if he is labeled as a "group toilet" (I forgot the exact term) and gives himself away to others, he can CHOOSE not to give himself away to Doumeki.
Very good observation when you mentioned that D wants to crush Yashiro, as men usually do when their pride is wounded. In my story too, the SA was committed against me because my D felt he was losing me, and how dare he lose something that belongs to him. "I don't care if you're gone, as long as your body remains."
"How can romance be built on that sort of foundation?" It can’t. It’s practically too late for that. I hope Yoneda tells the story the way she intended it (I assume based on the pre-timeskip). I am immensely afraid that she will bow to pressure. I hope she realizes what message she will be sending to readers by doing so, which I guess you can do in fiction, but because carefully crafted stories and characters like Yashiro are so rare, I would think she has a moral obligation to free Yashiro from the shackles and patriarchal mindsent that is imbedded us. Or to carry out the story quite tragically, where Yashiro suffers or even dies because of the world he lives in (which is unfortunately very realistic in the real world as well).
sometimes you just gotta say a i za to me boli kurac and move on
Léon Keusters - Heist aan Zee
Affogato on Burgundy - Cansu Rossi , 2025.
Turkish , b. 1980s
Oil on canvas board , 20 x 20 cm. 8 x 8 in.