Source
almost home
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ

Discoholic 🪩

pixel skylines
Today's Document
official daine visual archive
KIROKAZE
we're not kids anymore.
Monterey Bay Aquarium
RMH

Andulka

oozey mess

blake kathryn
🪼
Stranger Things
Keni
Cosimo Galluzzi
Sweet Seals For You, Always

No title available
Noah Kahan
seen from Russia
seen from United States

seen from Italy
seen from Russia

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Libya
seen from United States

seen from United Arab Emirates

seen from Türkiye

seen from Brazil

seen from United States

seen from Norway

seen from Canada
seen from Israel
seen from United States
@onoderalovedestiny
Source
As fertility science becomes more advanced and cheaper I worry about the creation of a surrogate underclass and the faux liberation of wealthy women. Allow me to explain.
Rich women who are actors or ceos or celebrities often use surrogates to have children so they can keep working, not risk their physical health and appearance, or overcome infertility. Kim Kardashian, Rebel Wilson, Tyra Banks, Elizabeth Banks, Nicole Kidman, and Lucy Lui are all examples of wealthy women who have used surrogates.
Reproductive technology which allows for surrogacy will become more accessible to middle class women. If we reach a culture where it becomes the norm for an upper middle class/middle class woman who wants children to hire a surrogate so that her professional life will not be impacted, we will see an increase of women with more social and economic influence. Pregnancy is a lot of work, after all, and affects how a woman is able to participate in her career and may be seen as a liability on that basis. The women of the upper middle class will be able to participate more in their careers, and this may create an illusion of women’s liberation.
However this isn’t possible without creating a underclass of surrogate women. Upper middle class women will have their freedom from pregnancy only because the burden will have been pushed to the less privileged women. If the surrogacy market expands in this way, more underprivileged women will be dependent on receiving a paycheck from their agency by carrying pregnancies. The ability of these women to have their own careers based on their interests and desires for themselves and the world will be hindered by the physical toll of pregnancy.
This division between women who buy the pregnancy and the women who carry the pregnancy would likely be along lines of race, and nationality which intersect heavily with class. Women aren’t liberated until all women are liberated.
This isn’t certainly going to happen on a large scale, but it’s a possible future I believe must be avoided.
@/knownheretic, Amy E. Sousa, on instagram: Argument takedown: "You are reducing women to their biology." It isn't reductionist to accurately observe the physical circumstances of other organisms. It's no more reductionist to notice a woman is a woman not a man than to notice she's a human not a fish. She's a woman because that's her physical circumstances not because she's playing a social role. Transgenderists are saying that "woman" IS a social role and that whatever sex of human performs the social role culturally prescribed to women is the "woman." This reifies regressive stereotypes and reinforces sexism.
-
I want to share some of my favorite videos from @/knownheretic, Amy E. Sousa, here. I also encourage all radical feminists, gender criticals and people who are interested in learning about child safe-guarding to follow her 🫶
When I was younger, my impressionable mind absorbed the idea that J.K. Rowling was the most evil, bitchy, old hag in the whole world as I blindly followed the trans rights movement. As I got just a bit older, I simply.. developed critical thinking skills? It didn’t take much for me to sit down, genuinely try to read and understand what she was saying, to think - “wait a minute, where is she wrong here? why is everyone acting like she killed someone?” I scrolled and scrolled through some more tweets and could find no reason as to why she’s so much more notorious and hated than actual male murderers, rapists, abusers— or, you know, the people actually killing trans people? No trans identifying person has ever died at the hands of a radical feminist, yet, of course, all the focus and blame falls on women. The jokes write themselves.
SPECIFIC MOVIE RECOMMENDATIONS #1
🌙✨ Gothic Fairy-Tale Films with Strong Female Leads ✨🌙
🍒❤️🔥Hey lovelies,
If you're like me find endless inspiration in the aesthetics of gothic fairy-tales, then you're in for a treat! I've created a list of enchanting atmospheric films, perfect for a cozy evening with your favorite tea.
To start with, of course, an absolute classic: a folk horror, menstrual tale with possibly the most aesthetically beautiful frames I've ever experienced in cinema. I constantly post something from this film on my blogs.
Valerie and Her Week of Wonders (1970): This surreal Czechoslovakian film follows young Valerie as she discovers a dreamlike world filled with vampires and magic. It's a visually stunning exploration of adolescence and awakening womanhood.
2. Daughters of Darkness (1971): This cult classic Belgian horror film features a mysterious, seductive countess who preys on young lovers in a deserted hotel. it’s a hypnotic blend of gothic allure and vampiric intrigue.
3. Nosferatu the Vampyre (1979): Werner Herzog's remake of the classic silent version. The film captures the gothic essence with stunning visuals and a chilling, melancholic tone. It's a mesmerizing exploration of fear and beauty.
4. The Vampire Lovers (1970): This Hammer Horror classic stars Ingrid Pitt as the alluring vampire Carmilla, who preys on young women in a secluded 19th-century village. it’s a captivating blend of horror and sensuality.
5. Beauty and the Beast (1978): This dark fantasy film, directed by Juraj Herz, offers a unique and eerie retelling of the classic fairy tale.Ideal for those who love a blend of dark romance and fairy-tale magic.
6. Viy (1967): This Soviet horror film, based on Nikolai Gogol's novella, follows a young priest who must spend three nights watching over the body of a witch in a haunted church. With its eerie atmosphere, stunning special effects, and deep roots in Slavic folklore, it's a captivating blend of supernatural horror and gothic fantasy.
That's all for today. I have many more films like these saved on my watchlist, so once I find some gems, I'll make another list. You can also look forward to a list of my favorite old fairy tales adaptations.
Kisses 💌💌
The most baffling deflection liberals do is say “but the church is worse!!” whenever they’re criticized.
“Hey let’s not have drag queens preform to children because of the sexual nature of the performances”
“But the catholic priests touch little boys!!!!”
“Um how about we don’t let any male self id into women’s spaces cause it lets predators get in without challenge”
“This concern is invalid because teenage girls are groomed in youth group!!!”
“Hey pornography is really harmful to women-”
“gmtisyshbwfudlsCHURCHfgskzyvana”
Hate to break it to you but if someone is getting away with something awful that doesn’t absolve you of responsibility for your own actions.
“but being a sex worker is the same thing as working as a waitress”
does a waitress have to worry about getting stds from men everyday?
does a waitress have to worry about getting pregnant?
is a waitress expected to have sex with multiple strangers everyday?
is a waitress expected to have sex with men who can and will cause her physical harm?
this is such an americanized and privileged take and view on prostitution. no your shitty retail job with a boss who’s slightly mean to you will never be on the same level as what prostituted women have to go through everyday
"Alright. Ladies and gentlemen, ladies and gentlemen. Okay. Unfortunately for you guys, Dallas you’ve drawn the short straw. You’ve gotten the show where I’ve genuinely just stopped caring. And - ah you see, this show has kind of bled off the stage into loads of different environments, and I don’t mind hollow shallow accusations of being racist or stuff like that, it kind of allows the show to do what it’s designed to do - expose inconsistencies and hypocrisies, I use myself to do that. But I don’t know how familiar you all are with the lore of this band, but we got banned from Malaysia this year. And it has nothing to do with you guys, but unfortunately there’s so many incredibly stupid people on the internet that I’ve just cracked. And everyone keeps telling me that you can’t talk about Malaysia, don’t talk about what happened in Malaysia, so I’m gonna talk about it at length. And unfortunately you have to listen to it. And this is long, so. You’ll be all right. But I am pissed off, to be frank. I’m gonna read from my phone what I have to say about this situation, regardless of whether you care or not because the internet needs to hear this.
The 1975 did not waltz into Malaysia unannounced, they were invited to headline a festival by a government who had full knowledge of the band with its well-publicized political views and its routine stage show. Malaysian festival organizers’ familiarity with the band was the basis of our invitation. Me kissing Ross was not a stunt simply meant to provoke the government, it was an ongoing part of The 1975 stage show which had been performed many times prior. Similarly, we did not change our set that night to play, you know, pro-freedom of speech or pro-gay songs. To eliminate any routine part of the show in an effort to appease the Malaysian authorities’ bigoted views of LGBTQ people would be a passive endorsement of those politics. As liberals are so fond of saying, “silence equals violence, use your platform”, so we did that. And that is where things got complicated. Naturally. the Malaysian authorities were irate because homosexuality is criminalized and punishable by death in their authoritarian theocracy. That is the violent reality obscured by the more friendly term “cultural customs”. But it was the liberal outrage against our band for remaining consistent with our pro-LGBTQ stage show which was the most puzzling thing. Lots of people, liberal people, contended that the performance was “an insensitive display of hostility against the cultural customs of the Malaysian government, and that the kiss was a performative gesture of allyship”. To start, the idea of calling out a performer for being performative is mind-numbingly redundant as an exercise. Performing is a performer’s job. The stage is a place for creating artists’ expressions, which are inherently dramatized. That’s why audiences go to fucking shows. Other people, other apparent liberal people, contended that the kiss was itself a form of colonialism. That The 1975, in the rich tradition of evil white men past, was forcing its Western beliefs on the Eastern world. My how the West has fallen, ladies and gentlemen. The East India Company could have saved a fortune on weaponry if they knew that all they had to do was make out with each other to forcibly subjugate the people that they exploited. To call The 1975’s performance colonialism is a complete inversion of the word’s meaning. Colonialism is the practice of forcible occupation and economic exploitation. Once again, The 1975 was INVITED into the country to headline Malaysia’s music festival in an effort to capitalize on our popularity so they could make money. Despite the band being amateur jiu-jitsu enthusiasts, we’re not very good, we have no power at all to enforce our will on anyone in Malaysia. In fact, it was the Malaysian authorities who briefly imprisoned us. So for performers like Julian Casablancas, who took to Twitter to criticize us, this bizarre mangling of colonial identity politics merely served as an expedient way to express their own disappointment with the festivals cancellation because it would be in poor taste, surely, to lament a loss of performance. So these are the types of mental gymnastics that are employed by celebrities to save face with their liberal-appearing audiences who delight in having their favorite academic catch phrases parroted back at them. I’m not waiting for applause, I’m just calming down.
Levying the accusation of colonialism against Western critics is, by now, a standard PR procedure in the authoritarian theocracy playbook. Just last summer, amidst criticism of human rights abuses against the enslaved workers who built their soccer facilities, the UAE’s representatives contended that Western journalists who highlighted this fact were guilty of enforcing their colonial games on their local, religiously-armed customers. But the fact that the UAE employs the Western consultant McKinsey to write this kind of perverted relativism is a great stroke of irony. And the fact that the UAE was the first country to kick The 1975 out for being gay is the cherry on top. There’s a contradiction at the heart of liberals’ outrage over our supposed cultural insensitivity. Their unconditional belief in inclusivity and tolerance has led them to indirectly support a government which is intolerance of their own existence. What responsibility do liberals have to be ideologically chivalrous to those who wish them death?
If you truly believe that artists have a responsibility to uphold their liberal virtues by using their massive platforms, then those artists should be judged by the danger and the inconvenience that they face for doing so, not by the rewards that they receive for parroting consensus. There’s nothing particularly stunning or brave about changing your fucking profile picture whilst you’re sat in your house in Los Angeles. I’m really fucking pissed off with this shit. Malaysia’s militarized enforcement of laws against public displays of homosexuality creates a clear line in the sand for what artists are allowed and expected to do. But elsewhere, this line isn’t so defined. Even here in America, there’s loads of states which uphold illiberal laws that restrict people’s bodily autonomy and gender expression. I don’t know why you’re cheering. But I suspect, I’ve got an inkling, that those who took to Twitter to voice their outrage over The 1975’s unwillingness to cater to Malaysian customs would find it appalling if The 1975 were to acquiesce to, let’s say, Mississippi’s respective bullshit abortion or trans laws. The idea that it’s incumbent upon artists to cater to the local cultural sensitivities of wherever they’ve been invited to perform sets a very dangerous precedent. It should be expected that if you invite dozens of Western performers into your country, they’ll bring their Western values with them. If doing the same things which made you aware of them could land them in jail in your country, you’re not actually inviting them to perform - you’re indirectly commanding them to reflect your country’s policies by omission. This kind of statement criticism goes against the very idea of a site of cultural exchange where differences are allowed to coexist. This, that, is a more valuable idea to protect than the bigoted sensitive of those that wish its demise. Yeah. Don’t forget who wrote this."
— Matty Healy before singing Love It If We Made It in Fort Worth, Texas (October 9, 2023)
"The most rage-provoking element of being a female is the gaslighting that happens when, you know, for centuries, we've been just expected to just absorb male behavior silently. Right? Silent absorption of whatever any guy decides to do. And oftentimes when we, in our enlightened state, in our emboldened state now, respond to bad male behavior, or somebody just doing something that was absolutely out of line and we respond, that response is treated like the offense, itself. You know, there's been situations with… recently with somebody who's very guilty of this in my life, and it's a person who makes me feel or tries to make me feel like I'm the offender by having any kind of defense to his offenses. It's like, 'Oh I have absolutely no right to respond or I'm crazy. I have no right to respond or I'm angry. I have no right to respond or I'm out of line.' So, you providing the musical bed for me to make that point that I've been trying so hard to figure out how do I say that… how do I say why this feels so bad?"
November 25, 2020: Taylor talks about using the song 'Mad Woman' to express female rage. (source)
Touched by sunlight’s golden caress
“Even if I knew that tomorrow the world would still go to pieces, I would still plant my apple tree.”
— Martin Luther King Jr.
breakfasts from the last couple weeks…lots of apples and eggs and jam and yogurt
I hate women who insist they ‘aren’t feminists’ and yet go to school, have a job, have an opinion on elections and other aspects of politics, enjoy reading, enjoy going out for walks on their own, go and get haircuts, wear pants, wouldn’t abandon their child when it turns out to be a girl, talk to men on their own, wouldn’t marry off their child to a stranger, and insist on their ‘freedom of speech’. Every aspect of your life you enjoy was fought for by the women you claim were mislead.
jk rowling: sex is real and you shouldn’t be fired for thinking that
liberal media: this might sound like an innocent statement, but it’s actually supporting the violent transphobe maya forstater
maya forstater: i will use preferred pronouns but i don’t believe that people can literally switch their biological sex
liberal media: this might sound like an innocent statement, but it’s actually supporting violently transphobic radical feminist ideology
radical feminist ideology: gender roles should be abolished because they oppress women, so claiming that conforming to women’s gender roles makes you a woman is counterproductive. while being gender non-conforming is great, it doesn’t change your sex
liberal media: this might sound
TRAs: jk rowling needs to be raped to death
liberal media: this might sound like a violent threat, but it’s actually a perfectly reasonable reaction