Hmmm letâs see coughs clears my throat puts on my glasses
Darkshipping is NOT a helpful coping mechanism. Antiship does NOT mean pro harassment. Bisexuals CAN be butchfemme. Bigenders CAN be sapphic. Engaging in paraphilic thoughts is BAD, actually.
You can spend months upon months talking about how the sexualization of teens in America emboldens child molesters and enablers, how spaces like kik, and Google shoving mlp porn in your faces as a small child and much more contribute to the culture that protects and enables predators. You can do this for YEARS even, pointing out how your own experience as a survivor in America shaped these views. But you mention ONE time that lolicon being on elevator walls in the same place where old men can legally buy dates with teen girls in broad daylight is probably not a good sign, suddenly you're a racist who thinks all Japanese ppl are pedophiles and no csa ever happens in America and molesting children is only something ppl of color do. Meanwhile the actual children of color, especially little Japanese girls, continue to get trafficked bc if we recognize that societal power can be in the wrong in another country and that sometimes cultural beliefs (like idk, that women should be chaperoned by men at all times, and should be property for instance?) Can be fundamentally rooted in evil, then we're racist pro-censorship nazis. You can talk for months about the child marriages in Utah but ONE singular comment about how children all over the world are affected by this makes you a racist. Fellas is it racist to want it to be harder for rich Americans to buy children as sex slaves? Fellas is it racist to want children of color to be protected when they get molested, sexually harassed and have propoganda glorifying their molestation shoved in their faces? Fellas?
Fella is it racist to want people to stop raping kids?
People who say "there's no such thing as a thought crime" give me the impression they call ppl racial slurs in their heads (probably out loud too and just say its fiction/their kink)
If I find out someone has been looking at me and thinking âDisabled retard faggot trannyâ Iâm knocking their head on a stone wall.
A cop may not arrest you for a thought you happily think but doing things on purpose has consequences.
Files post: To answer the person demanding you do the proving for him: The Epstein files prove that the top executives at companies like Victoria's secret, men who write music about how nice it is to chase teenage girls, directors who put out movies about how romantic it is for teens to marry/fuck/kiss men twice their own age, and public figures who defended the likes of lolicon, child beauty pageants, and juicy booty shorts for 7 year olds, all participated in actual factual offending.
Hell not even Epstein files but Neil fucking Gaiman defended lolicon and guess what! Lo and behold he defends stuff like that because he wanted his own acts of raping women to be viewed as just quirky fetish stuff!
Ask yourself why men like that wanted those things to happen. If fiction has no effect on reality how did propoganda do anything at all in the holocaust, why do advertisers bother at all with making ads? If fiction does not affect reality why do we care about representation, stereotypes, or demonization of marginalized groups in media. You cant have it both ways.
Actual literal-proven by mountains of evidence and victim testimony-child rapists who kidnap kids rape them and sell them shaped our media landscape and societal beauty standards. The sooner you reckon with what this means about what we've been fed by them the better.
Insane how the files have literally proven that all the things we were talking about, the sexualization of minors, the societal grooming of teenage girls, was literally orchestrated by actual pedophiles who were actually raping little girls. CSA victims tried to tell everyone years ago but unless you're a good victim who thinks rape and pedophilia are sexy actually NO ONE FUCKING LISTENS.
Studies, history, and the actual reveal that the people shaping our media were literal child rapists all prove us right and we're still called fascists for it.
OH MY GOD. THIS. Oh. My god. Oh my god.
Itâs not Puritanism, itâs not censorship, itâs not cancel culture, itâs HAPPENING FUCK youâre SO SO right holy shit
âThe sexualization of minors, the societal grooming of teenage girlsâŚunless youâre a good victim who thinks rape and pedophilia are sexy actually NO ONE FUCKING LISTENSâ
Epstein and his equally as disgusting cohorts also fantasized about these things and supported media romanticizing/sexualizing/glorifying these things. No paraphile who offends ONLY offends, theyâre also engaging in the media the rest of the offenders engage in, like literature, art, teen and child porn.
My account is by an antishipper for antishippers, we as a community know how paraphilia ties into darkshipping.
If youâre absolutely certain that those paraphiles in particular didnât engage with darkship content (with means all content regarding âdark romanceâ, romanticization/sexualization of rape, children or animals) fine, thereâs no way I can convince you of a connection between offenders and stories about offending if you canât possibly see it, even though itâs there.
If you want me to use the term csem instead of cp in the future, I will. Keep in mind though that they still mean the same thing. Pornography in general is usually exploitative. Porn production companies are ALWAYS exploitative. Sexually explicit material and Pornography are synonyms.
I was just looking for verifiable sources to support these claims.
I appreciate that, and I apologize for the pedantry, but this isnât about what I want. Csem is a correct term. Cp is not. Itâs an important distinction, because we donât want to blur the lines between consensual porn and nonconsensual material.
If you, for some reason, cannot see the connection between child molesters and sexualized literature about child molesters,, If you, for SOME reason, cannot see why child molesters would enjoy sexualized literature about child molesters, I cannot possibly help you.
Porn IS sexually explicit material. Sexually explicit material involving children is never consensual, that shouldnât even have to be a conversation.
Insane how the files have literally proven that all the things we were talking about, the sexualization of minors, the societal grooming of teenage girls, was literally orchestrated by actual pedophiles who were actually raping little girls. CSA victims tried to tell everyone years ago but unless you're a good victim who thinks rape and pedophilia are sexy actually NO ONE FUCKING LISTENS.
Studies, history, and the actual reveal that the people shaping our media were literal child rapists all prove us right and we're still called fascists for it.
OH MY GOD. THIS. Oh. My god. Oh my god.
Itâs not Puritanism, itâs not censorship, itâs not cancel culture, itâs HAPPENING FUCK youâre SO SO right holy shit
âThe sexualization of minors, the societal grooming of teenage girlsâŚunless youâre a good victim who thinks rape and pedophilia are sexy actually NO ONE FUCKING LISTENSâ
Epstein and his equally as disgusting cohorts also fantasized about these things and supported media romanticizing/sexualizing/glorifying these things. No paraphile who offends ONLY offends, theyâre also engaging in the media the rest of the offenders engage in, like literature, art, teen and child porn.
My account is by an antishipper for antishippers, we as a community know how paraphilia ties into darkshipping.
If youâre absolutely certain that those paraphiles in particular didnât engage with darkship content (with means all content regarding âdark romanceâ, romanticization/sexualization of rape, children or animals) fine, thereâs no way I can convince you of a connection between offenders and stories about offending if you canât possibly see it, even though itâs there.
If you want me to use the term csem instead of cp in the future, I will. Keep in mind though that they still mean the same thing. Pornography in general is usually exploitative. Porn production companies are ALWAYS exploitative. Sexually explicit material and Pornography are synonyms.
Now another "dark romance" author, worse than Tori Woods as of now, a french author, has been caught writing csam/csem, but this time ABOUT A LITERAL BABY AND IN DETAIL TOO!!
And i dont wanna hear any of Tori Woods' defenders, in her horrible "Daddy's Little Toy", Arthur had been lusting for Lucy SINCE SHE WAS 3 YEARS OLD!! AND IN THAT CHARACTER PRESENTATION OF ARTHUR, HE WAS LITERALLY SAYING "My juicy Lucy, she is finally eighteen."
WHAT GROWN ADULT SAYS THAT ABOUT THE DAUGHTER OF HIS BUDDY!! EVEN IN A FICTIONAL SETTING!!! THE AGE GAP IS HUGE, CUZ ARTHUR IS SAME AGE AS LUCY'S FATHER, AND IT'S A HUGE POWER PLAY HERE!
Oh thats fucking ill. What. Who writes this shit??? I firmly believe that literature like this, fictional or not, comes from a place of fantasy. I donât think thereâs any way anyone could understand a character like this in a romantic setting without being like that character. Thatâs fucked up.
Iâm literally at a loss for words, I donât know what to say. Thatâs fucking nasty.
Insane how the files have literally proven that all the things we were talking about, the sexualization of minors, the societal grooming of teenage girls, was literally orchestrated by actual pedophiles who were actually raping little girls. CSA victims tried to tell everyone years ago but unless you're a good victim who thinks rape and pedophilia are sexy actually NO ONE FUCKING LISTENS.
Studies, history, and the actual reveal that the people shaping our media were literal child rapists all prove us right and we're still called fascists for it.
OH MY GOD. THIS. Oh. My god. Oh my god.
Itâs not Puritanism, itâs not censorship, itâs not cancel culture, itâs HAPPENING FUCK youâre SO SO right holy shit
âThe sexualization of minors, the societal grooming of teenage girlsâŚunless youâre a good victim who thinks rape and pedophilia are sexy actually NO ONE FUCKING LISTENSâ
Epstein and his equally as disgusting cohorts also fantasized about these things and supported media romanticizing/sexualizing/glorifying these things. No paraphile who offends ONLY offends, theyâre also engaging in the media the rest of the offenders engage in, like literature, art, teen and child porn.
My account is by an antishipper for antishippers, we as a community know how paraphilia ties into darkshipping.
That âWhy proshippers are good actuallyâ video by Mushroom Girl is full of reasons why fiction affects reality and I just think thatâs beautiful.
âHe take he brother limb so he need him forever uwuâ âHmmm methinks Kyle touches Ike innapropriately todayâ âincest is so hot. Oh, youâre a victim of incest? Well im autistic, beat that.â
Hey, you guys fucking suck actually
âis jus fiction! >~<â âItâs just fiction!â âItâs just fiction, also im autistic!â
I think you all should die
âYOU CANT SAY DAT!â âHARASSMENT!â âFURRIES BEWARE; ABLEIST! IâM AUTISTIC!â
So fiction and fantasy is only bad when I do it. Got it.
There are 937 public works under the infanticide tag on ao3. Ooooohhhh my god I hate that cursed site. Donât argue with me I PERSONALLY donât like the website.
Iâm sexy and hot because I site my sources. I bring a little 4-years-worth-of-humanities-courses vibe to the function. Me? Research? Pshh, heh, yeah đ. They call me Mr. Knows-Many-Things-About-Moral-Topics.
you love to claim to be progressive with your incest and pedophilia content
look at our (USA) government. they are literally the ones actually doing what yall love to draw/write about. touching their family members, SA'ing children. they want you to be desensitized to it, which clearly works because well look at you! they tried to censor the epstein files to protect themselves, which obviously does not work at all.
republicans are actually anti censorship just like y'all. hypocrites, i know. they yell about free speech, and yes, everyone should have free speech. but that doesn't mean consequences from your actions. if you yell the n word on live tv you deserve consequences. if you draw a picture of a child being assaulted, you deserve consequences.
the fact that this is a problem on tumblr doesn't surprise me at all, this site is mostly made up of white people who don't fit in with the majority of their peers. incest, pedophilia, SA etc. are more normalized in white spaces than they are with any other racial group. it's common knowledge. why do you think there were no black girls in the epstein files. and before y'all start saying i'm making this about race for no reason, that people of color do it too... i know some do. "MOSTLY" is the key word here. just thought i'd throw this paragraph in
ANYWAY you will try to argue that because you were abused as a child, you do it to cope. and i'm not trying to invalidate anyone's trauma, of course, but there's literal studies that prove indulging in harmful material like that only makes your situation worse. makes your mind worse. you need to get ACTUAL help. therapy if you can afford it. talking to someone who is not an enabler. why do you want to see others put through the horrible things you went through? not a healthy coping mechanism. creation and distribution of this kind of stuff only normalizes it more and you will never break the cycle that way.
ik this post is literally not gonna change anything cause i'm just some person but letting y'all know where i stand...
https://www.tumblr.com/opinionatedsideblog/809515331264643072/cw-epstein-files-insane-how-the-files-have?source=share
different anon, but seriously, when the pro/com/dark ppl will ever understand? HELL, ao3 in of itself is a nest full of RPFs of LITERAL CHILDREN
i dont give a fuck it's a fictional scenario, the "characters" used are REAL BREATHING CHILDREN!!!! YOU PPL ARE THIRSTING OVER REAL BEINGS!!!! / nay blog owner
Gigantic content warning for everything under the cut. Discussions of pedophilia, beastiality, rape and murder.
Thereâs a tag on AO3 that discusses the rape and murder of freshly born babies. Literal infants. I get that AO3 is an archive or whatever, but theyâre ship tagging and unlocking their posts. They WANT people to see this shit. If they want anyone to have a place to write on their platform, at the very least put rules in place so that people donât find that shit ON GOOGLE.
How can someone write something like that and not feel in any way disgusted at themselves? That is pornographic literature depicting children, how can someone, as a writer, not understand that it is DISGUSTING to fantasize about that, especially publicly.
Literally, and I mean this seriously, there is a fic on AO3 wherein someoneâs self insert Israeli soldier goes into a childrenâs hospital, rapes and kills every child inside, and then bombs the hospital. I know this because I was unfortunate enough to come across it on Bing when researching Israelâs strike on a hospital in Gaza last August.
These people, darkshippers and paraphiliacs who write about their fantasies and urges and post this writing publicly, have NO shame when it comes to the disgusting things they think about. A person without shame is a person without a conscience to stop them from doing this in real life.
If they are given the means and ability to play these things out, they will. Epstein had the money, the connections, and the assets and the privacy to get as many children as he wanted. There was nothing stopping him.
Douglas Spink, a rampant zoophile and former co-host of a literal zoophile podcast, had his own farm. He provided the horse victimized in the Enumclaw Horse Sex Case, which also happened on his farm. He also let people pay to rape his dogs, and raped dogs himself. The first time he raped a dog was at a dog breeding center.
If these people are given the means to do what they want to, THEY WILL. You canât trust them when they say that theyâre ânon offending,â or ânon contact,â because that only means they havenât YET. Creating in or engaging in this fiction only makes it more likely that someone with these thoughts will offend, if they havenât already