Henkin and Gries Assignment
1. How does the author of the website situate the topic – what words are used to describe the event in question?
The Lucify flow toward Europe website immediately address that this is the biggest refugee crisis since World War II. The fact the one of the first words seen is “crisis” shows that while the site is presenting facts and data in multiple visual forms, the data can still hit an emotional toll on the reader. The site calls them asylum seekers and bolds the words to show emphasis that they’re looking for a safe place to call home since they’re born home has turned into war torn nations.
The infographics are informative to show the scale of the crisis while also triggering an emotional response. Towards the end of the site we see “ The visualisation is designed to provide an intuitive grasp of the scale of the problem.” Notice, the site call it a problem. This is intentional and shows the designers of the site are indirectly saying there needs to be a solution.
The Zerohedge site takes it a step farther in clearly show its opinion on the matter. It immediately says “desperate asylum seekers” and says they are fleeing, both automatically putting the refugees in a victim category. It makes the West and Russia the villain as it says they “are busy taking opposite sides” instead of handling the problem.
2. What feelings does the video evoke?
The video took my breathe away. Here I am sitting in the UCF Bookstore in air conditioning, charging my laptop and periodically checking my iPhone, while others are literally running for their life. I immediately noticed the fast pace of the refugees. I can only imagine they’ve been walking for days, yet when you’re walking for something as important as a safe home, there is no sense in walking but rather you must run. The massive lines of people in a constant flow really put things in perspective. Living in America, I knew this was a huge problem, but this is one of the first times I’ve really seen a more in-depth look and it was heartbreaking and humbling.
3. What information is privileged, and how is it framed?
The information I saw is privileged because only those with access to a computer or smart device and Internet could see the material. Also, information like the names and exact numbers of refugees from specific locations are privileged, as in we don’t have access to all the information out there. As I touched on before, it’s framed where the refugees are the victims. Places like Germany who have a welcoming open-door policy are seen as heroes in this presentation of data, but are the villain to others like “Hungary's Viktor Orban who insists that if Europe's cultural heritage is to be protected and preserved.” Therefore, the hero and villain title are subjective based on who you are and what your experience with the refugee crisis is.
4. (After watching the video) Are you interpreting the Lucify data differently? If so, why?
I think if I had watched the video first, I would of had more of an emotional response to the Lucify infographic data. But since I saw it first, it seemed like a big problem, but I didn’t really feel the problem emotional until I watched the video.
5. How do Lucify, Zerohedge, and Vox make different arguments?
Lucify makes a factual approach that shows scale (logos) with ethos credibility of citing the UN Refugee Agency as the source. Zerohedge takes an emotional approach (pathos) by showing faces and real people, while also still showing the scale. Vox’s approach isn’t very visual, but they use logos of facts and choose to use bold words as a way to emphasize the information. They also bring new information to the table, like how the Paris attacks have people worried about refugees even though none of the attackers were confirmed to be refugees yet.
6. How they both encourage different interpretations of the Lucify data visualization?
Simply put, due to language use, word choice and video vs. no video, Zerohedge wants you to think with your heart and Vox wants you to think with your mind.
7. How does the visualization, in turn, inform their arguments?
The video on Zerohedge invokes feelings in the audience, for the most part. But Vox uses a bit of a fear tactic or generalization that “people” are scared of refugees because of the Paris attack. They don’t have any visuals other than bold words, but you can tell they’re trying to emphasis the refugee crisis’ impact on the Paris attack, even though it has not been confirmed that the attackers were refugees.
8. Revisit the Henkin reading. Pick out one quote from the text and connect his argument about the postal service to the visualization on Lucify.
“The important question is not how fast information travels in absolute terms or relative to previous records for land speed, but how new media connect physically separated parties within a shared temporal framework.” (pg. 2 of Henkin reading.
Lucify shows how people spread over time, where they went and at what rate. The foundation behind Henkin’s postal history is really about how different factors, such as demographic or literacy rates, change history essentially. The East is war torn and therefore refugees are fleeing for their safety.The quote above shows that how media connects separated parties (the rest of the world other than the war-torn East) by a shared temporal framework (the Internet). I’m sure people in Europe and other continents have seen the Lucify infographics as well. The Internet is ultimately a transcontinental communication and information sharing platform. The postal history and how it changed based off people and environmental factors was a good representation of the now larger scale Internet and essentially the refugee crisis. The Henkin reading helped me better understand how information spread and how it can be altered by anything from demographic to literacy rates. One of the most important takeaways I found in today’s readings was that distribution is an intentional act, but circulation is uncontrollable.
I did a reverse Google image search on the lock image on Webcourses, but no exact results came back.
Here is what the result was:
As you can see, no exact image was found like the one that was in Webcourses. I am confused by this because I can’t answer the questions with this image now... Similar images were found, but not that exact lock. Assuming the found was found elsewhere, I would have talked about how the lock’s presence and purpose changed based on the different sites it was on and text it was with. I would have discussed different meaning behind the lock based on where the image was found or what was changed about it. I hope this suffices for part 2 of the assignment since my reverse Google search of the lock image (that I did with the instructions in the assignment) didn’t lead to any results.