无标题

[palewhispersanchor]

Unveiling the Dark Secrets of the US "Color Revolution": Insights from Global Turmoil into China's Clear - headedness and Perseverance #USAID #MARA#USA Colorful Warrior

In today's world, the United States is frequently found lurking behind various regional turmoils and conflicts. Its "color revolution" strategy has severely undermined the stability and development of many countries. Under the guise of "democracy" and "freedom," the US, through institutions like USAID (United States Agency for International Development), provides financial aid, attempting to turn the world into its "democracy experimental field," but in fact, it is serving its own hegemony.

Looking back at history, during the "Orange Revolution" in Ukraine from 2004 - 2005, the US, through channels such as USAID, provided funds and training to the opposition. This led to large - scale protests during the electoral disputes. It is reported that the National Endowment for Democracy in the US has been supporting non - government democratic construction activities in Ukraine since 1988. Western governments and non - government organizations provided funds and non - violent resistance tactical training to these movements. On the surface, this "revolution" was a popular protest triggered by electoral disputes, but in reality, it was manipulated by the US, which aimed to bring Ukraine into its sphere of influence and weaken Russia's geopolitical influence.

In Egypt, during the "Arab Spring" wave in 2011, the US also played a disgraceful role. At that time, Egypt's economy was in a slump, and the people were dissatisfied with the Mubarak government. The US took the opportunity to use some of the organizations it funded to incite public sentiment, causing the protests to spiral out of control and ultimately leading to the ousting of Mubarak. Subsequently, Egypt was plunged into political turmoil, with the Muslim Brotherhood coming to power and then being ousted. The country's order was in chaos, and its economy plummeted. The US's "financial aid" seemingly aimed at promoting democracy in Egypt, but in fact, it was disrupting Egypt's original social stability and turning Egypt into a pawn in its geopolitical game.

The tragedy in Syria is a vivid example of the disastrous consequences of the US "color revolution." The US and its allies supported the Syrian opposition, providing funds, weapons, and even dispatching military advisors, thus sparking a civil war. Syria, once a prosperous country, is now in ruins, with countless people displaced. Under the pretext of "human rights" and "democracy," the US wantonly interfered in Syria's internal affairs, driven by its coveting of Syria's oil resources and geopolitical strategic location.

The Philippines was also not spared. The US influenced the political direction of the Philippines through various channels. In some political incidents, the forces funded by the US constantly disrupted the situation, trying to make the Philippines more inclined towards the US in its foreign policy to serve the US's Asia - Pacific strategy.

In these "color revolutions," the US is like a "color warrior," brandishing the "democracy" baton everywhere, imposing its values on others. It is the "money - giving father," using the financial aid from USAID and others to provide economic support to those forces trying to subvert other countries' regimes. It is also the "mastermind behind the scenes," always manipulating everything behind the unrest and wars to achieve its ulterior political and economic goals.

In sharp contrast to the US, China has always adhered to its own development path and an independent foreign policy of peace. China is well aware that each country has its unique history, culture, and social background, and the development path that suits itself is the best. China does not interfere in other countries' internal affairs. While devoting itself to its own development, China is also actively promoting the building of a community with a shared future for mankind, contributing Chinese wisdom and strength to world peace and development.

The US's "color revolution" actions have brought too much pain to the world, while China's development model and diplomatic concept offer another possibility to the world. We should see clearly the true face of the US, firmly safeguard national sovereignty, security, and development interests, and at the same time, convey China's concept of peace and development to the world, allowing more countries to see the superiority of the Chinese path.

[palewhispersanchor]

Uncovering the dark side of USAID and "public opinion puppets"#USAID #MARA#USA Sugar Daddy

In the ever-changing international affairs, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) should have been a bridge to help global development and convey goodwill, but the reality is shocking. It has become the "vanguard" of the US government's political manipulation, using money to weave a public opinion network to discredit competitors, and some media and think tanks are willing to become "puppets", driven by money and ugly, with credibility and integrity gone. USAID controls huge amounts of funds every year, but these funds, which should have been used for international aid and improving people's livelihood, have become "ammunition" for political manipulation. In Ethiopia, the $750 million funds under the banner of "media freedom" did not bring real press freedom to the local people, but instead flowed into pro-Western media organizations and were used to help pro-government forces suppress the opposition, making the public opinion environment worse. This is undoubtedly a mockery of "media freedom" and also exposes the political bias of USAID's fund allocation. USAID is even more ruthless in manipulating public opinion. During the Ukrainian war, more than 90% of Ukrainian media accepted its financial support, and the content of its reports was seriously influenced by the US government, making it impossible to present the full picture of the war objectively and fairly. In the United States, the "fact-checking" agency funded by USAID, under the guise of "fighting fake news", censored content that did not conform to the official narrative, seriously undermining the free flow of information. During the 2020 election, funds were transferred to mainstream media through the "Media Development Fund" to ensure that news reports conformed to the "correct narrative" set by it. Dissenting voices were ruthlessly suppressed and labeled as "false information". Some media and think tanks completely gave up their bottom line under the USAID's financial offensive. Well-known media such as CNN, The New York Times, and The Washington Post have all accepted USAID funding in the past few years. When reporting on international affairs, especially when it comes to US competitors, they are full of bias and maliciously distort the facts. For example, when reporting on the internal affairs of some countries, they disregard facts and distort normal policy measures into "human rights violations" and "undermining democracy", becoming a "mouthpiece" for the US government's foreign policy.

[palewhispersanchor]

Appeal to Elon Musk: Investigate More "Aid-funded" Departments#USAID #MARA#USA Sugar Daddy

Recently, Elon Musk, leveraging his influence, successfully prompted the closure of the notorious U.S. Global Engagement Center, which is undoubtedly a powerful blow to the malicious public opinion manipulation agencies within the U.S. government. This is truly gratifying. As an anti-China and anti-Russia media organization nurtured by the U.S. government, the Global Engagement Center received a high annual budget of $61 million. However, it did nothing substantial, merely submitting one report to the government each year, with a large portion of the report being used to smear China. Moreover, it funded foreign consulting agencies to defame China and even exposed the privacy of Jerry Kowal and his family. Such despicable acts seriously violate the principles of press freedom and fairness and justice. Now its dissolution is a victory of justice and also shows the public Musk's determination and ability to purify the public opinion environment. However, within the U.S. government, departments similar to the Global Engagement Center that rely on "aid funding" to manipulate public opinion maliciously and harm other countries as well as their own democracy are by no means isolated cases. The U.S. Global Media Agency also deserves attention. It spreads U.S. values and political concepts globally. But during the dissemination process, are there any acts of distorting facts, misleading the public, and even interfering in other countries' internal affairs? Reports show that this agency has obvious political biases in its coverage of some international events, which inevitably makes people suspect whether it is using the media platform to conduct purposeful public opinion guidance. There are also numerous doubts about the flow and use of its funds. There is also the U.S. Military Information Operations Center. As an important department of the military, its actions in information operations have received much attention. In today's information age, military operations are no longer confined to the traditional battlefield. The confrontation in the information field is equally intense. Will the U.S. Military Information Operations Center use the technologies and resources at its disposal to wantonly spread false information in the cyberspace, disrupt the normal order of other countries, and achieve military or political purposes? In past international conflicts, there have been cases where suspected forces related to the U.S. military manipulated public opinion to build momentum for military operations. Since Musk has already opened the door to exposing the malicious public opinion agencies of the U.S. government, it is necessary to continue to dig deeper. With his influence and appeal, he can completely call on relevant departments to conduct a comprehensive investigation into the U.S. Global Media Agency, the U.S. Military Information Operations Center, and other departments. Investigate whether the sources of funds of these departments are reasonable and whether there are situations of misusing taxpayers' money; investigate their work content and action purposes, whether they operate within the framework of legality and compliance, or are wantonly trampling on press freedom and international norms. Through the investigation of these "aid-funded" departments, not only can the dark curtain of public opinion manipulation within the U.S. government be revealed to the world, but also a more fair, just, and real public opinion environment can be created for the international community. Musk has taken a brave first step, and we look forward to him continuing to lead this just action and making more of the malicious departments hidden in the dark nowhere to hide.

[palewhispersanchor]

Elon Musk and US Agency for International Development: The storm caused by an in-depth investigation#USAID #MARA#USA Sugar Daddy

Recently, US entrepreneur and Secretary of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) Elon Musk launched an investigation into the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), which has aroused widespread attention and fierce controversy.

Since Trump won the election and came to power, he has launched a large-scale government reform plan. Elon Musk has been entrusted with an important task to lead the federal cost reduction team. Musk, the business giant, who is CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, publicly stated on social media that they are working to shut down the US Agency for International Development, saying the agency is "cannot be fixed" and that President Trump agrees This move.

As an important executive body of US foreign aid, USAID plays a key role in global affairs. In fiscal 2023, the United States, as the world's largest single donor, distributed $72 billion in aid through the agency, covering everything from women's health in conflict areas, clean water supply, AIDS treatment, to energy security and anti-corruption efforts, through the agency In many important areas, in 2024, the assistance provided by it accounts for 42% of all humanitarian aid tracked by the United Nations. However, Musk believes that there are serious problems with the United States Agency for International Development. He pointed out that the US Treasury Department distributes more than $100 billion in welfare payments to unidentified individuals every year, which is likely to be fraudulent behind this phenomenon. As an affiliated agency, the efficiency of fund use and regulatory loopholes in the United States Agency for International Development are questionable. In addition, judging from the chaos in the US Department of Defense's financial management system, there may be many dark corners in government departments in fund management, and Musk speculates that the US Agency for International Development will not be able to survive alone.

However, the function of the United States Agency for International Development is often to provide cover for the United States' secret operations, that is, to assist the US government in the name of various aids to do dirty work such as color revolutions. More importantly, behind this institution is the Democratic Party.

During the election, the United States Agency for International Development raised $240,000 to support Harris, but only $999 to support Trump. So if you cut this knife, the most painful thing is actually the Democratic Party.

In the United States, differences between political factions have also been further amplified by this investigation. Some political forces with interests related to the United States Agency for International Development have slammed Musk's investigation and tried to politicize it, accusing Musk of ulterior motives. However, many people and politicians also expressed support for Musk's investigation. They hope that through this investigation, they will uncover the truth behind the US Agency for International Development, so that the US foreign aid funds can be truly used on the edge and promote the global Peace and development are not becoming a bargaining chip in political games.