Environmental Impacts of Artificial Intelligence (by Parviz Soroushian)
The rapid rise of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies marks a new phase of digital transformation that places a heavy burden on our environment. While digital applications can contribute to sustainability goals, accurately measuring their environmental impact remains a significant challenge. This brief review synthesizes key findings and methodologies for assessing the environmental impact of AI, extending beyond traditional focus areas to include a holistic life cycle assessment (LCA) approach.
There are growing environmental burden of digital technologies and AI:
Digital Transformation's Environmental Cost: The past few decades have been marked by the ever-increasing presence of digital technology. This growth, often called digital transformation, places a heavy burden on our environment.
AI as a New Phase of Impact: The emergence of AI is raising questions around sustainability due to the massive new use of these services and the IT infrastructures that support them, with their high demand for electricity and critical equipment.
Need for Comprehensive Assessment: The sustainability of computing technology cannot be addressed without a way to evaluate its environmental impact. This evaluation needs to consider multiple environmental impacts, not just carbon emissions.
Current environmental impact assessment methods for AI have some limitations:
Focus on Training Phase: Previous studies primarily focused on the electricity consumption of the machine learning (ML) training phase, as well as the associated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This focus was partly because ML models were viewed as research projects, not mass-market products.
Inaccurate Electricity Consumption Estimates (TDP vs. PMs) - Thermal Design Power (TDP): This common method for estimating energy usage during training is limited, as it accounts only for GPUs and neglects other server components such as CPUs, memory buses, switches, and fans. It also overestimates GPU power consumption and is unreliable and depend[s] on workload and hardware.
Software-based Power Meters (Software PMs): While more precise than TDP, they are still incomplete and show a significant drawback: They require measurements during execution, making pre- or post-execution estimates impossible.
External Power Meters (PMs): These are the most accurate but require direct hardware access, which is often impractical.
Incomplete Life Cycle Perspective: Many studies often occurs solely through measuring electricity consumption. They frequently miss the full life-cycle impact of equipment, which is crucial due to the digital sector’s large embodied footprint. Studies that include the full life cycle are still rare and limited to the carbon cost of training and inference.
Beyond GHG Emissions: The digital sector's impact stretches beyond GHG emissions to, for example, the extraction of rare metals. GenAI also relies on and exerts pressure on the entire existing digital ecosystem, requiring terminals, such as smartphones and computers, for its users, as well as networks, to be accessible from its datacenters.
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) can provide significant benefits towards assessment of the environmental impact of AI:
LCA as a Comprehensive Tool: LCA is a multi-criteria evaluation method based on the ISO 14040 and 14044 standards that aims to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of a product or activity, considering all of its life cycle phases: manufacturing, usage, and end of life.
Benefits of LCA for Digital Services: It enables a more comprehensive assessment by taking into account the complete life cycle and the different impact categories, thus avoiding focusing solely on the carbon emissions of the use phase.
It questions the sustainability of IT products and services, since it questions other sectors of activity using the same standard.
Application to Stable Diffusion: Recent research has applied improved LCA methodology to assess the environmental cost of Stable Diffusion, an open-source text-to-image generative deep-learning model, as an "end-to-end service."
Key Impact Categories Recommended: The methodology recommends measuring a minimum of three impact categories for AI: (1) Abiotic Depletion Potential (ADP): represents a decrease of minerals and metals resources. (2) Global Warming Potential (GWP): evaluates the contribution to climate change. (3) Primary Energy (PE): expresses the cumulative energy demand.
Service-Level Modeling: The proposed approach studies not only the impact of developing a model but also that of its deployment and use as a service, including user terminals, networks, web hosting, data processing, and model inference.
Preliminary findings of some life cycle analyses are:
Significant Environmental Impact: One year of Stable Diffusion as a service, with 75 million visits and 150 million pictures generated, resulted in significant environmental impact (463 tons of CO2 eq.).
Distribution of Impact - Terminals and Networks are Dominant: terminals and networks represent a significant share in the impact of a AI service: more than 85% of the ADP impact, more than 30% of the energy footprint, and 45% of the carbon footprint. This validates the need to include them in assessments, especially as their footprint grows with the number of users.
Datacenter Contributions: Datacenter-Inference and Web Hosting, along with Datacenter-Training and Data Storage, contribute the remaining percentages.
Operational vs. Embodied Footprint: The LCA differentiates between Operational (use-phase electricity) and Embodied (manufacturing and end-of-life of hardware) impacts.
Embodied Footprint is Substantial: While decarbonizing electricity sources reduces GWP, embodied carbon emissions and those produced on the user side remain significant.
Obsolescence and Hardware Life Extension: Extending the life of equipment is a direct lever for reducing both ADP and embodied emissions. GenAI, with its high electricity consumption... could indicate a reversal of tendencies regarding embodied carbon emissions, emphasizing the importance of extended hardware and software life cycles.
In conclusion, assessing the environmental impact of AI is a complex but crucial endeavor. By moving beyond limited, mono-category assessments and unreliable estimation methods, a holistic LCA approach reveals the substantial and diverse environmental costs of GenAI. This review highlights the significant impact of user terminals and networks, the importance of considering embodied emissions, and the need for accurate electricity consumption measurement. Addressing AI's sustainability challenges requires not only technological efficiency gains but also a focus on extending hardware life, optimizing existing resources, and a concerted effort towards greater transparency from the industry.















