Who the F@#% is that actress....
Late Thursday afternoon I had rendezvous with an old friend planned, on the patio outside of RIMAC. It is a very large and wide-open space, but still has great Wi-Fi along with a generous serving of 2, 3 or 4G wireless connection. Between Gatorade commercials, “Google” being used as a word, and cell phone technology it’s hard to keep my G’s in order these days. The point is if there was situation that needed to be dealt with by a smart phone during the conversation, we were set, assuming she owns a smart phone. A safer assumption than the alternative.
We began catching up on winter break and the first couple weeks of school. I do not have an extensive history with this girl, but we did go to high-school together and are from the same area so we do have a certain sense of familiarity with each other. Nonetheless, our conversations still dragged at points and she was not coy in letting me know with jabs like:
“So, this conversation is going well" (sarcastic tone) and “Joey, I think it’s your turn to ask some questions now.”
Finally, we chose to talk about the very safe, time-killing, but fun topic of winter break movies. We went down the list: The Fighter, True Grit, Black Swan, King’s Speech, and Tron: Legacy. She enjoyed talking about the actors or actresses in each. When we finally got to the incomparable Tron: Legacy, we did not know one the main actresses.
Joey: “Who was that hot-ass lead actress wearing the black stretchy spandex stuff the whole movie.”
Friend: “I don’t know, who was that. Wait, its chill, I have a Smartphone.”
As I stared into space and twitted my thumbs, she logged on to IMDB and we found out it was Olivia Wilde, born as Olivia Jane Cockburn, who also starred in such TV shows as House and movies like Alpha Dog. After that bit of information, the slow pace of our conversation resumed and the hang out session was over soon after.
One of my greatest tricks as a conversationalist is the “who was that actor/actress in that movie, I have to know” trick. This is especially useful because the guessing can go on for a good amount of time and provide the chance to bring up other topics in the meantime. For example “Oh, I think it was that chick from Austin Powers, great movie, yeah? etc ….”. Even though they are wrong guesses, they only add to the conversation.
We were stuck on the actresses name from Tron: Legacy and guessed it was Jaime Pressly. We had had a riveting conversation about about her great work such as My Name is Earl, and actually great work like I Love You, Man. After a while she figured out I only brought up Jaime to kill time even though she does have an uncanny resemblance to actress in the movie. The conversation officially ended soon after. I think talking about My Name is Earl is a pretty good signal that the conversation lost its sizzle. We left the conversation without figuring out the actresses name.
Do smartphones add to knowledge to conversation or provide a roadblock to free-flowing discussions?
In this case I have to give the edge to smartphone intervention. Even though it hinders conversationalists from making up facts, in a creative sense of course, the joy people get from finding answers overshadows the entertainment value of the former. I always feel for people that have something on their mind that they cannot figure out. For all practical purposes, whatever is on their mind will be a bigger distraction to the interaction than the couple minutes it takes for a mobile device to search the internet for a fact. Machines are always getting faster as well, look at Watson on Jeopardy.
I do think it is annoying when people look at their phones in the middle of a conversation, but it does not automatically take away from the conversation. If the information that is being recovered is pertinent to the conversation, the research time is worth the thumb twitting time.