'Foxfires at the Changing Tree' by Utagawa Hiroshige, 1857.

shark vs the universe
Monterey Bay Aquarium

PR's Tumblrdome

bliss lane
Keni
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
Sweet Seals For You, Always
🪼
Today's Document
todays bird

tannertan36
noise dept.
d e v o n
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

ellievsbear
RMH

Discoholic 🪩

@theartofmadeline

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣

seen from Maldives

seen from Australia
seen from Germany
seen from Uruguay

seen from Maldives
seen from Spain
seen from Italy
seen from Poland
seen from Canada
seen from Bolivia
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Australia

seen from Türkiye
seen from Türkiye
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from China

seen from Vietnam
seen from Uzbekistan
@pink-n-fuzzy
'Foxfires at the Changing Tree' by Utagawa Hiroshige, 1857.
La jalousie
Kostis Fokas
Abstract bodies 2019
Teuta Matoshi Duriqi // Haute Couture - Spring 2018
i need to stop talking to men at 3 am i be saying shit like “we’re soulmates” like GOD someone stop me
nipples poking through a shirt are an accessory we should all learn to appreciate
☆Lana Del Rey☆
behind the scenes for British Vogue
details @ alexis mabille fall 19 couture
Tim Davies and Celia Hammond [1962] by Terence Donovan
i remember being like 11 and asking my dad why he hunts and kills deer and he said “because i think theyre beautiful” and that’s just. that’s just what men are like
The Great Gatsby (2013)
Alexandre-Jean Dubois-Drahonet
French, 1791-1834
Female nude, 1831 (detail)
Florence via @isabelle.de.vries on Instagram
The Concept of Non-Photography:
Non-photography, theorized by François Laruelle, is about devorcing all context from a photgraph. There is no concept of a subject, photographer, composition, pretext, or context. It exsists in a void as a sort of non-thing, as if there was no sentient being able to percive and analize it. It exsist’s merely as an aeasthetic, but not even really as an aesthetic because that is a philosophy in itself.
He states that the photograph is not a picture of reality or even a copy or abstraction. It is a fiction that is “wholly real but in its own mode”- the fictional realm. The photograph is unique unto itself, an unlimited opening into the world occasioned by lights and shadows in time, but is in no way constrained by either the experiential universe or the theoretical and art historical preconditions set up for it.”