Mike Driver
cherry valley forever

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Noah Kahan
occasionally subtle

No title available
One Nice Bug Per Day
taylor price

titsay
No title available
tumblr dot com
KIROKAZE
macklin celebrini has autism
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

izzy's playlists!
RMH
ojovivo

Kiana Khansmith
Cosimo Galluzzi
The Bowery Presents
seen from Australia

seen from United States

seen from Ecuador

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Australia

seen from Indonesia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Bangladesh

seen from India
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from Malaysia
@pipthehuman
the nearest depiction of an animal or other sentient fantasy creature to you at this moment comes to life right where it is (i.e. cat photograph, shark plushie, dragon painting, etc)
what happens to you
i am so dead
i need to go to the hospital
maybe a few things to be looked at but i’m fine in the end
i’m totally fine
i’m totally fine and i’m happy
my situation is really really really specific lemme tell you about it
n/a
assume it doesn’t know you (unless it’s actually a specific animal you’ve met) and that it’s normal for its species and would do whatever was natural for it. including being too giant for and destroying the room it’s in. as well as dying immediately if its environment can’t support its life
i am... leaning against my rainbow mothman flag. uhhhhh mothman won't hurt me right? he'll like fly away or something.
Hello my friend!
I'm genuinely curious as to your thoughts on transfem!Daniel, because I personally HC him as transmasc! A lot of his physical manerisms are subtle points to me (ESPECIALLY the arms-over-chest and how he's sorta slouchy, classic chest-hiding techniques I've done personally.) plus in the VR-chair flashback his parents call him Danny. Obviously that's a diminutive name suitable for a young boy but I choose to believe it's a gender neutral name he asked them to use.
Also I'm a trans man and I love him, so :)
I'm just wondering if there's anything that points you to a transfem HC! Thanks!
Hi there!!
I love transmasc daniel as well! I super see it, especially for all the aforementioned reasons-- its my primary headcanon regarding their gender. However, I also like to play around with the idea of a transfem daniel (among other versions) for personal enjoyment. The headcanon itself is honestly like 70% vibes based and because I think its very neat (save me femme Dr. Jackson, femme Dr. Jackson save me). Nonetheless, I have a couple details that may point to it, so here are some from both the show and deuterocanonical sources.
SG-1 at the Zoo:
Sam: *Reading a map* If we just follow-
Jack: *Bribing a zookeeper to let him pet a tiger*
Daniel: *Accidentally leading a group tour because he started talking*
Teal'c: *Being stalked by a very aggressive goose*
Cam: *Feeding an animal he 100% was not supposed to feed*
Vala: *Already climbing into the penguin exhibit*
Sam: WHERE DID YOU ALL GO?
I’m finally watching sg1 and I loved Atlantis, but John and Rodney— while they become best friends are not drift compatible (maybe by season 5–actually John and Ronon might be a more immediate fit)
But anyway what this post is, is to say that Jack and Daniel are so completely drift compatible. Like, even in season 1 they’re speaking at the same time, talking to Bra’tac, and instead of saying earth has ships they’re both like “…. shuttles.”
It’s hilarious, they seem really opposite at first, Jack hates any explanation that goes on too long, Daniel loves talking. Jack’s a military man, Daniel is an academic.
HOWEVER they both have wanderlust, they both have no real sense of self preservation, they both go to crazy lengths to protect their people, they’re both smart (despite what Jack pretends) and they just think pretty similarly. I’m only in season 2 and they’re almost always in sync. Plus, even early in season 1 Daniel is calling Jack just Jack, but he’s still calling Carter Captain. Like you’d think he’d be closer to the other “smart” person on the team, and they do get along well, but there’s still something that’s just special about Jack and Daniel.
Anyway, they’re officially on my drift compatible list, some version of soulmates, romantic or platonic or a secret third thing (will travel across the galaxy for and with each other)
I think about these tags by @original-asteria at least once a day
Ten gifs of Daniel Jackson that are especially #babygirl
Shirts inspired by this picture
Rewatching Tin Man. SG-1's reactions to being a robot:
Jack: hates being a robot
Daniel: is having an orgasm over being a robot
Sam: tries to calmly assess the situation from both sides
Teal'c: *what's done is done*
Comtraya!
"The only time we got him [Richard Dean Anderson] to behave, if you could call it that, was when he had to do scenes with Thor. He loves working with that little guy; the scenes between Thor and O'neill really were a riot to do," says Wood. "Rick had the best time. Each time he walked over to talk to Thor, the puppeteers would make him talk back, but with hilarious ad-libs. There are so many outtakes of Thor yelling things like, 'Dammit! What's my line?'"
-Stargate SG-1 The Illustrated Companion Season 3 and 4, Fair Game, p. 19
Rewatched Crystal Skull for fic purposes and I am absolutely fucking chewing on the hypothetical Ballard Family Dynamics like a dog dissecting a plushie
Like, what WAS Claire Jackson like as a mom? and how does what we see of Nick Ballard* inform that??
was she a workaholic, like her dad and her son? Daniel PRETTY EXPLICITLY takes after Nick, which begs the question: did it skip a generation? Nick VERY CLEARLY loves Daniel though he has ZERO fucking ability to show it. Did that come to him later in life, or has this always been true? Was it true for his daughter? Did he pass that on to her?
Also, in the episode where Daniel has to watch his parents die over and over, Claire seems frustrated and unwilling to deal with Daniel in that moment. Is that just how much she needed to focus right then? If I was moving a slab of stone that big, I might be uncharacteristically short as a parent. Or was it something deeper? Was she a little more inclined to tell Daniel he was fine when he complained about discomfort?
Or was it neither of those things? Can we even trust that this memory version of her is at all accurate to the real woman? After all, Daniel was only 8 and this was a major trauma, he might misremember who she was based on what happened with her. Maybe in all the times he played it over and over in his head, she shifted slowly to someone who would dismiss her son claiming to have broken an arm because Daniel knows that he didn't have one at the time, and that no matter how hard he tries, he cannot imagine a world where she lives, because that is not the one he lives in. Of course she would know he was lying about his arm. Stupid of him to think it would work.
In conclusion
*sidenote: mathematically nick ballard probably would have survived/maybe fled? nazi occupation of the Netherlands and I am also turning that over in my mind, trauma from that DEFINITELY DID NOT HELP his relationship to his family
@plutospulsar no wait come back here because I can combine our insanity BECAUSE Nick didn't admit himself until Daniel was 15 or so and apparently Daniel visited him often before the events of the movie SO DID HIS FOSTER PARENTS TAKE HIM TO GO SEE HIS "INSANE" MATERNAL GRANDFATHER OR DID THAT START IN COLLEGE OR WHAT?
Like, you're 15 and your grandfather who refused to take you in so he could go wander the world and left you with a foster family just institutionalized himself over the theory he ignored you for. HOW DO YOU EVEN RESPOND TO THAT
the movie had him hostile to the idea of his foster family being called his family SO LIKE were they bad? or was Daniel just really proud of being his parents kid? or was he just having a horrifically bad day and didn't like how much the military knew about him so he testily corrected them to prove they didn't know everything?
most people would probably just throw their hands up in the air and say the writers probably just wanted to establish Daniel had no friends and no family so we want him to stay on Abydos at the end of the film
So anyway, back to what we were saying. I don't really know anything about the foster system, but did he rotate through families or stay with one, which is why the military thought they were his normal family? did Nick, on some level, keep an eye on Daniel while he was in foster care or had Daniel not heard from him in years before he admitted himself. Did Nick regret telling Daniel to call him Nick after Claire died and not know how to walk that distance back? Is the reason Daniel was surprised that Nick talked about him so much the hospital staff said any friend of Daniel's was welcome because every time Nick looked at Daniel he saw regret. We know Nick saw himself, did he also see his daughter?
SERIOUSLY, DID HIS FOSTER FAMILY TAKE HIM TO SEE NICK? DID THEY THINK HE SHOULD GO TO NICK, SINCE HE WAS DANIEL'S ONLY REMAINING FAMILY? DID THEY DISCOURAGE IT SO DANIEL WOULDN'T TURN OUT LIKE HIM?
so many questions the writers never expected us to ask dshghd;fgjs
In the movie Daniel tells Catherine they're "foster parents" instead of his biological parents, and it shows him as a baby in their arms. Whereas in the show when they delve deeper into Daniel's past in s2 e4, we see his parents' death where he is around 8 years old. I'm only on s4 so don't expect a great deep-dive into Daniel's past but my mom was a social worker and worked with foster kids for most of my life.
I don't know whether he was in an abusive foster home, adopted and in an abusive home, in a loving foster home, or a loving adopted family. Based on the way he only ever mentions his birth parents and birth family, we can make the assumption that he's not super keen on his adoptive/foster family. Either that or he's a very private man (he's really not). Based on that assumption, we can also assume he was most likely in an indifferent or unloving/abusive foster home and it was either a long-term placement with no adoption, or an adoption and he just still calls them his foster parents. And on the subject of his relationship with Nick, I'd like to think that he would take the bus or walk to the facility to visit with his only family member left.
My general headcanon/assumption is that he was in an indifferent/neglectful home, and since he wasn't getting any attention there, he decided he would put all his effort and attention into school so he could be like his parents and his grandpa (and get praise from his teachers). He excelled academically, getting scholarships and grants to help get him through college (him getting grants was mentioned in the movie) Though, I saw a post on here earlier (LINK) where it talks about how Daniel disassociates when in stressful situations (their example was s3 e19 where you can see him disassociate during the torturing of his friends.) He could have developed this when he was younger, when a foster parent was yelling at him and he would just "zone out" or maybe he was bullied at school and this was how he coped. I don't know.
And that's just a theory… A STARGATE THEORY!
you know how you can go and watch a movie you watched a bunch as a kid and the version of a song in it is different? like they actually changed it since you were a kid? that isn't normal. we didn't do that until like, the last ten years. it's fucked up.
This is a post about how the Extra-Special-Super-Limited-Collector's-Wet-Dream versions of Neon Genesis Evangelion that cost $250 on ebay don't have "Fly Me to the Moon" in the credits even on the ADV dub.
i know I'm playing this off as me being pedantic but i really shouldn't.
Up til about the last 10 years it was widely understood that if you licensed a song to be used in a film or a video game or a television show that that song would be in that film or video game or television show in perpetuity.
Then, about a decade ago, things started changing. I don't know the exact point in time it changed, but the first time i became aware of it was around 2017 or '18 when some video game, i think it was Grand Theft Auto IV, got a big patch that did exactly one thing and that was remove a bunch of songs that had been in the game because the licensing expired.
And I remember being angered by that but going "oh well, that's video games, right?"
But then a couple years later when Netflix got the rights to Neon Genesis Evangelion and not only put out a new dub but took "Fly Me to the Moon" out of the show, even on the above ultra-fancy collector's Blu-ray set, which included the old dub.
And then recently i was watching From the Earth to the Moon, a HBO miniseries about the Apollo program that I've watched many many times in my life. It was one of my favorites as a kid, and i saw that it was on HBO Max. The thing that made me wanna watch was that it was remastered in 4K. Up til a couple years ago the only version available had been on DVD and I was, you know, really excited because I'm a bit of a cinephile (as you all may have gathered from my, uh, everything) and it's something I'm very familiar with.
Now as you might expect from a docudrama about the Apollo program, there's a lot of 50s, 60s, and early 70s music in it. Episode 5, "Spider", opens with a montage of space age art set to the theme song for Fireball XL-5.
So I'm watching this episode, which mind you, is one of my absolute favorites both as a space nerd and a machine fucker. (When you are done reading this post, please take the time to watch this clip that was formative to me as a robot girl.) So I'm on my nostalgia trip and i get yanked the fuck out because the song playing is not the right one.
It's still the theme song to Fireball XL-5, but its a cover, clearly recorded much later than the original, and it's really fucking jarring. Because the original is the exact sort of kitschy, early-60s space-age stuff that is being montaged in this opening scene.
And the really nutso thing is, I can't find anything about this anywhere. It's not that I'm crazy or that it isn't happening, its that it's just...gone. They do that now.
This is not normal.
It is not normal for companies (because this is 100% corporate pissing contests) to be able to retroactively change pieces of art because they don't want to lend their "intellectual property" to it anymore.
You should be angry about this. It's disgusting. And it was not normal until the last decade.
Queer as Folk!! The music was so integral and the streaming versions that exist now are a shadow of their former selves.
Wonder if anyone else has noticed that Daniel always dissociates when bad things happen? (Watching New Ground and he does it when they knock out Sam and almost kill Jack, and a bunch of other times.) Make so much sense for him as a character and I feel like it was a conscious choice by Michael Shanks but maybe I'm reading into things too much?
My head canons for SG1 in the kitchen:
Jack: A grill daddy obvi, but also secretly a gourmet chef. Addicted to the Food Network. Likes to try out new recipes, would impress dates with his cooking if he ever got around to it.
Teal'c: Also addicted to the Food Network. Doesn't get to test it out much since he lives on base, but once he and Jack figure out they have this in common it's all julienne this and sous vide that, it becomes one of their bromance bonding things.
Daniel: Will eat anything a different culture gives him on principle and will brag about the exotic things he's tried, but left to his own devices has the tastebuds of a 5-year-old and lives on sandwiches and Eggos, often forgets to eat. Sam and Jack take turns reminding him/feeding him.
Sam: A decent cook, sticks to the things she knows, fish, chicken, pasta, casseroles, some recipes passed down to her including some from Jacob who tried to do a father-daughter cooking thing with her occasionally when there was time, things Sam's grandma taught him. Is open-minded about trying new foods others make or offer her.
Janet: Cooks most nights but mostly out of utility, after working all day not much energy for it. Food is usually under or over salted. Once Cassie is a teenager she takes an interest in cooking and takes over more of the cooking duties.
General Hammond: Has a couple potluck/holiday dishes he's known for. General Hammond's potato salad is infamous.
Neurodivergent Daniel Jackson Evidence
Note: I will make a part 2 whenever I get around to re-watching the show.
honestly one of the best parts of autism is deep diving into an off-hand line in a show/movie/book that doesn't matter at all to see if it makes sense. literally no one cares but it's so fun regardless.
SG-1 and Christmas gift giving 🎄🎁
Sam: Awkward autistic girlie, gift giving's kind of hard for her so she usually gets everyone the same thing, but something nice like high-end coffee. Sometimes she'll get Janet something more specific because she knows better what she might like, and gets good gifts for Cassie. She wants to get more specific things for the others, like she would like to give Jack something fishing-related but doesn't know anything about fishing so usually just defaults to her universal gift.
Jack: A lot of times it's gag gifts. Sometimes it's a bit more thoughtful. He never knows what to get Sam. Daniel and Teal'c are easier, Teal'c's charmed by anything that has to do with Earth culture, and so is Daniel really. He'll get Teal'c DVDs, Daniel books, sometimes he really misses the mark with Sam like gets her a weird kitchen appliance she'll never use and she's like, "Thank you, sir,' *grimace*. But he tries. One time he got her a nice telescope similar to his and that was good. Usually he just gets people silly socks or mugs though.
Daniel: It changes every year, sometimes he forgets and it's last minute gifts from the convenience store, other times it's nicer stuff, like one time he got Jack a really nice chess set and they play on it together. He can figure out good gifts for Sam when he remembers in time, like a book about an astrophysics concept she mentioned. He's really good at getting Teal'c gifts because he comes up with curiosities about Earth culture, like world art sculptures or exotic food gifts. One year he got him a Chia pet and Teal'c loved it.
Teal'c: Does not understand this Earth custom at first so doesn't reciprocate. In later years he starts the gift-giving tradition but it's a little weird, like one year he gave Daniel a whole uncooked ham because he heard that ham was traditional for Christmas. Daniel still has the ham in his freezer. One year he went to Macy's and the gifts were really random, like he got Sam an odd-looking piece of luggage and Jack a porcelain gravy bowl.
Jonas: Once he learns about Christmas he is SO excited about it and spends way too much money on gifts but always gets people super nice things. Jonas is the best gift giver by far. Also great at wrapping presents.
General Hammond: Gift card giver extraordinaire, but the gift cards are specific to stores that they each would like and the amounts are generous. Also elaborate gift baskets courtesy of his wife.
Implications and Parallels in Crystal Skull
AKA I just realized how much of this episode can be read as an analogy for Daniel’s childhood
Nick and Daniel's adulthood falling out over their archaeological theories is repeatedly brought up, but the main conflict of the episode itself and Daniel's reactions to others around him are fairly detached from this recent estrangement. Instead, I feel like Daniel's attitude and fears are more so steeped in the emotions of Daniel’s childhood. This isn’t explicitly discussed or made clear, but almost every scene with Daniel out of phase essentially boils down to a particular and desperate line of thought that becomes more pronounced as the episode goes on:
‘I feel unseen. I am isolated and nobody hears me. I cannot turn to the people I used to rely on and the one person who can help is ignoring me.’
Of course, this lack of perception is the literal premise of being out of phase and could be literally interpreted. But looking at it from a meta perspective, it is a very interesting and deliberate-seeming choice of conflict for an episode all about estrangement, childhood abandonment, and grandparent-grandchild dynamics that makes me think that a reading of the episode as a beat-by-beat analogy of Daniel's childhood could be warranted
Undoubtably, such a strained relationship would have a nonzero effect on anyone, yet across the show, Daniel rarely talks about his past or the effects it had on him. Their pasts are mostly a mystery to us as viewers, and Nick undoubtably sheds a good bit of light on what Daniel's situation was. However, this time, the episode writing itself also gives more details of his emotional state through various double entendre lines that speak of his physical and emotional reality.
And, unfortunately, if the lines are interpreted this way, it implies of a period of Daniel's childhood was one of feeling invisible, misunderstood, and neglected.
This entire episode, he is hoping, begging, that someone will notice him, hear him struggling, and give him what he needs. Fix this. Fix him. And until thirty minutes into the episode, nobody can or will. Of course, most of the characters literally can’t. But the pleadings remain.
To me, the episode almost seems like it's meant as an epilogue to Gamekeeper and reflection of or parallel to Daniel’s childhood after his parents died. It's a backstory episode that gives him a past without explicitly defining or depicting most of the events.
So, what kind of backstory are we left with if we accept this premise and speculate based on the plot beats of this episode?
Well, when Daniel is eight, his parents die in a museum accident. Daniel has no family connections to speak of but Nick. He feels invisible afterward and like everyone around him either can't help him (ie SG1 incapacitated) or doesn't understand how to help him properly (ie Rothman), leading to some distress and frustration on both ends. When Nick is finally brought into the picture, thought to be the thing Daniel needs, he is no saving grace; Daniel continues being ignored and unaided for the most part despite his appearance. Nothing really changes, people try to help but miss the mark. Eventually, people begin to give up from Daniel's point of view (Jack and Sam at the elevator) and Nick shrugs Daniel off despite being the one person who can help and "see" him.
Then, finally, Nick does help. Daniel is heard again, and he starts to be noticed even if only a little before the event.
Now. The final scene of the episode is an almost double-edged sword of an ending, both to the episode and in how it suggests Daniel’s childhood afterward went. In the episode, Daniel and Nick make up, which brings a more satisfying conclusion to the adult/academic arguments that estranged him. It even seems to heal some of the strain surrounding Daniel's childhood. But despite it, the analogy of Daniel’s backstory is maintained and the trauma is repeated: Nick decides after the initial problem is fixed to leave for his work, and as a result, Daniel is left behind without him. There’s a promise of occasional visits, but occasional is the key word. Nick chose discovery over adopting Daniel then, and Nick essentially makes the same decision again.
And Daniel? He protests, says that Nick just came back into his life, says with his eyes that part of him doesn't want Nick to leave even as he lets him go. But like he said in the VIP room before, though Daniel is not happy, he can understand his choice. Daniel lets his grandfather go off with aliens. Little Daniel says goodbye to his grandfather and is sent away. Both of them try to work through the idea of being the second choice always left behind.
This time, at least, there is a positive: they can part after finally learning to understand the other. It really makes all the difference, I think, especially to Daniel. It's not quite the same as when he was a child anymore. It's important. It's an understanding so important to Daniel that Nicholas Ballard has now earned the title of "Grandpa" to him, and he knows Nick will now accept it.