Review: Shields & Shards & Stitches & Songs by Dan Beachy-Quick
Shields & Shards & Stitches & Songs
by Dan Beachy-Quick
Omnidawn Publishing, 2015
I must admit that I couldn’t resist the temptation to read Dan Beachy-Quick’s chapbook, Shield’s & Shards & Stitches & Songs, out of order. The chapbook is organized into four sections, each with seven poems bearing the same title: Shield, then Shard, then Stitch, and, finally, song. The reader quickly discovers that each Shard poem is an erasure of its corresponding Shield, each Stitch erases its corresponding shard still further, and each Song uses pieces of its corresponding Shield, Shard, and Stitch to create a new poem.
Beachy-Quick constructs his Shields on the page the way one might imagine a Classical Greek warrior’s shield on the battlefield; each is a slightly curved oval of text, only a few wide lines, centrally aligned on the page. As the back cover notes, the shields “call out to the violence from which they also protect us” (back cover). Like the battle scenes on Achilles’ shield, Beachy-Quick’s Shields direct their viewers to violence; the second one tells us to “Lash/Deeds to shadows” (10). The Shards are surprising in what they leave behind. Like archeological remains, they provide neither a complete nor a clear picture of the Shields that came before them. They repeat words, stammering, like someone dying in a war movie: “Be marker/be be stone” (17). The stitches, although they are even less complete, seem to be Beachy-Quick’s vision of the raw ingredients of a more modern, hopefully less violent poetry. One of the stitches, for example, contains the words “bee,” “loud,” and “glade” (26) familiar to all of those who know the “bee-loud glade” in William Butler Yeats’s poem “The Lake Isle of Innisfree,” a totally non-warlike poem about imagining a peaceful place of refuge. The Songs are larger than the original Shields, and emphasize nonviolence, reconstruction, and rebirth: “To put the moon back in a song” (39).
At first I wished each piece of this erasure puzzle was a little bit closer together, so that I didn’t need to flip as many pages. But eventually I realized that flipping back between each of the four sections is necessary to understanding the project of this collection—the reader does the work of an archaeologists, piecing the Stitches and Shards back to their original Shields. The cover image, a white box surrounded by multicolored lines that look a bit like the errors made by a misaligned inkjet printer, further emphasizes the laborious, sometimes frustrating process of piecing together parts to create a whole.
In all, Beachy-Quick’s message is a hopeful one: that studying history really can lead to a less violent present. Certain words remain in all the parts of his erasure and reconstruction process, words which seem to represent concepts held as important across cultures and throughout history. These words include “poet,” and the final word in the chapbook, “home” (39).
--Char

















