Also unbiasedbison is defending a known freakycare circle member, aka the same guy who literally made a whole flag to compare anticare to fascists. Same guy who called a teenager a "fascist dictator" for making anticare blinkies, awkkkward
Say what you want about the freakycare server and how that person supposedly wasn't in it until a later date, but they still supported Kc. Even then they took a design, a design of a headmate may I add, and posted it in a server full of predators encouraging them to steal it. He did this with the ocs of children as well. The difference with taking characters from Kc and redesigning them is that they were PUBLIC CHARACTERS. IN A PUBLIC WEBCOMIC. Kc was perfectly fine with redesigns, kinsonas, and f/os before, so why is it suddenly a problem now? Again, interesting logic there.
The designs the person posted were not only designs of personal ocs made by children and trauma victims, but also, in Chaos' instance, the design of a headmate. How can you preach about how everyone in anticare is ableist when you legit put the design of a HEADMATES SONA in with designs of ocs. That is an alter. That is not a fucking OC for you to steal. No matter whether or not this person was in the freakycare server to begin with, them saying that they would steal the designs of Chaos' alters sona and his partner shows that they had no respect for victims to begin with, let alone plural people.
On top of this, the account details that one of the reasons they are angry at Chaos is for contacting someone friends with Sugar's abuser/rapist. However, they contacted and chatted with someone friends with Chaos' abuser by taking "proof" from a freakycare server member, who they say is somehow a victim of Chaos. Chaos didn't force this person into joining the freakycare server, I don't know why anyone would believe a victim would FORCE someone to join a group dedicated to their abuser. The person joined that group on their own accord, nobody forced them into supporting Kc and her associates. Again, they are angry at Chaos for something they are doing themselves; interacting with an associate of the others known abuser. However in this case I don't think Chaos weaponized that person against Sugar, which is exactly what this person is doing.
This is also worth mentioning.
(take this with a grain of salt, but note the usage of the peace symbol here. The peace symbol is a common dogwhistle in Kc's circle for kindrednism/double peace, an in-universe website dedicated to kindred nsfw. Just something to keep in mind.)
This was made in response to a post detailing why people shouldn't donate to Kc - because she's a known abuser, and will not use the money to move away. We have gotten that confirmation from several people multiple times.
I think it's incredibly contradictory to say that everyone deserves to be donated to if they're in need, and that people should block people they don't like and move on, when this account does the opposite. It's tried to sway people away from donating to Chaos, and it's tried to weaponize his trauma against him by trying to turn every single community against him, including the anticare community. It has interacted with those in support of Chaos' abuser. It has undermined his trauma in favor of putting Sugars on a pedestal. I will not deny that Sugar is traumatized, but that gives no excuse to weaponize Chaos' own against him.
I've also noticed that this blog tends to be more active whenever it thinks that people are turning against Chaos. (Nothing against those who spoke about his actions, you have the right to speak your mind. I'm simply noting a pattern) I myself don't always like Chaos, hence why I have him and his partner blocked. But again, this gives no excuse to try to weaponize a whole community and prevent him from being supported for coming out about his abuse.
Block this account. Do not listen to it, do not interact with it. I am pretty fucking sure it's either Sugar itself, or a freakycare member trying to use the situation to their advantage.