iâve seen arguments like âif you banned internships then young people wouldnât be able to get jobsâ like no bitch when youâre doing an internship youâre doing a job someone is supposed to get paid for, if we banned it it would literally just become a paid position dumbass.
we are so lucky the lord of the rings 2001-2003 film trilogy was clearly worked on with so much genuine collective passion from its team and cast close to two decades ago instead of now... something was fatedly perfect about how it all came together.... can you imagine how awful itâd have been if it was being made in the late stage capitalism of 2019. Itâd have been like the latest star wars movies
the lord of the rings if it was filmed in 2019: dragged out to 9 films, no homoerotic subtext between any men except two background characters with names given in the credits, eowynâs story is completely cut out apart from her crush on aragorn, frodo has abs, gandalf is played by tom hanks, the ents have disturbing cgi animation reminiscent of dumbo, wormtongue is given a redemption arc as a fan favourite, gollum is somehow offensively caricatured in a woke-packaged way, aragornâs chivalry and desire for peace is changed to heroic battle lust and rudeness, legolas makes no fun expressions and instead looks blank in the background all the time,
The Four Thieves Vinegar Collective is a network of tech-fueled anarchists taking on Big Pharma with DIY medicines.
âFour Thieves claims to have successfully synthesized five different kinds of pharmaceuticals, all of which were made using MicroLab. The device attempts to mimic an expensive machine usually only found in chemistry laboratories for a fraction of the price using readily available off-the-shelf parts. In the case of the MicroLab, the reaction chambers consist of a small mason jar mounted inside a larger mason jar with a 3D-printed lid whose printing instructions are available online. A few small plastic hoses and a thermistor to measure temperature are then attached through the lid to circulate fluids through the contraption to induce the chemical reactions necessary to manufacture various medicines. The whole process is automated using a small computer that costs about $30.
To date, Four Thieves has used the device to produce homemade Naloxone, a drug used to prevent opiate overdoses better known as Narcan; Daraprim, a drug that treats infections in people with HIV; Cabotegravir, a preventative HIV medicine that may only need to be taken four times per year; and mifepristone and misoprostol, two chemicals needed for pharmaceutical abortions.â
âŚ
Since Four Thieves isnât actually selling or distributing the medicines made by its members, what theyâre doing isnât technically illegal in the eyes of the FDA, even though the agency has issued a public warning about the collectiveâs DIY methods. Shortly after Four Thieves unveiled its $30 DIY epipen, the FDA issued a statement to the media that said âusing unapproved prescription drugs for personal use is a potentially dangerous practice,â but didnât refer to Four Thieves by name. Ironically, only a few months later, the FDA issued a warning letter to Pfizer for failing to investigate âhundredsâ of complaints about epipen failures, some of which resulted in the death of the user. In May, the FDA issued another warning that declared a chronic epipen shortage.
As for the DEA, none of the pharmaceuticals produced by the collective are controlled substance, so their possession is only subject to local laws about prescription medicines. If a person has a disease and prescription for the drug to treat that disease, they shouldnât run into any legal issues if they were to manufacture their own medicine. Four Thieves is effectively just liberating information on how to manufacture certain medicines at home and developing the open source tools to make it happen. If someone decides to make drugs using the collectiveâs guides then thatâs their own business, but Four Thieves doesnât pretend that the information it releases is for âeducational purposes only.â
âThe rhetoric that is espoused by people who defend intellectual property law is that this is theft,â Laufer told me. âIf you accept that axiomatically, then by the same logic when you withhold access to lifesaving medication thatâs murder. From a moral standpoint itâs an imperative to enact theft to prevent murder.â
âSo yeah, we are encouraging people to break the law,â Laufer added. âIf youâre going to die and youâre being denied the medicine that can save you, would you rather break the law and live, or be a good upstanding citizen and a corpse?â
andulkaphoto
kianamaiart
germansingergirl
janainaart
origamiaround
