The Elephant in the Room Concerning Project SEKAI's Depiction of the United States: Colorful Palette's Anti-Blackness
Introduction
In a few ways, Project SEKAI's depiction of modern America (in context of Vivid BAD SQUAD's story) indicates that the writers have done research. Vivid BAD SQUAD are shocked to learn just how impossibly high the cost of living is in New York City. They are also faced with microaggressions and racism by the people they come across. Touya5 touches on how many different people live in New York City, and express their cultures through their music— and says it should be celebrated.
Furthermore, the location of America— and New York City, especially— is important for Vivid BAD SQUAD's story. It is the place where hip-hop, the genre that Vivid BAD SQUAD most often performs in, was created by Black Americans.
And yet, the Americans that Colorful Palette has deemed relevant enough to be depicted within the story look like this:
Every single one of these characters is white.
There is absolutely zero excuse for this. The writers have done enough research to know all of these troubling aspects about the United States, but continue to do anything but make a Black character. That is complete willful ignorance, and I think this fandom needs to talk about it more.
Now then, if you are, for some reason, not convinced that this is an issue worth discussing, the rest of this post will be explaining why you should care.
Why (Good) Representation Matters
Beyond the fact that the lack of representation undermines Touya5's message, and that Black Americans deserve to be represented in a story that discusses the music they created while the main characters are in that country, representation matters for a few reasons.
First of all, representation allows for the voices and experiences of marginalized individuals to be expressed. It can be important for people to see people like themselves in the media they enjoy. Furthermore, it invites people who are not marginalized in the same way to empathize with characters unlike themselves, and understand them better. In other words, media has the capacity to bring positivity to the people that are underrepresented, and humanize them to the people who are unaffected by the same issues.
In addition, good representation inherently enhances art. It is more interesting to have characters with a wide range of life experiences than it is not. It adds depth to a story's world and characters.
More Reasons Why You Should Be Critical of Colorful Palette for This (In other words, here's me anticipating bad-faith arguments in advance)
90% of writing is actually just researching for your story, any writer would know this. There is no excuse for ignorance.
There are thousands of resources online for how to draw Black characters, and write them without leaning into stereotypes. They have internet.
Just because other Japanese companies have this issue in their games does not make it less bad. Anti-Blackness in these games should not be normalized in the way it has been. It is something you should be openly critical of.
"Project SEKAI is intended for a Japanese audience" doesn't mean anything when Black people literally live in Japan.
You can still enjoy the story while understanding that this is an issue it has. They're not mutually exclusive.
If anyone wants to contribute any additional thoughts or discussion on this post, it is greatly appreciated. Thank you for reading.
the funniest thing about AA4 taking place during 2026 is that they had tried to design Phoenix looking like a sleazy bum with a drinking problem, and by absolute sheer coincidence, the beanie + hoodie + baggy sweats look is INCREDIBLY TRENDY this year. Every other man at my uni has been dressed like this lately. Phoenix is not dressed like he's at rock bottom, he's dressed fashionably. he's TRENDY. for all we know he could be wearing entirely designer
the rise of self-checkout is driving me CRAZY!!!! i personally love self-checkout to use as a customer, it’s usually much quicker and easier to do it myself and that’s not something that bothers me. HOWEVER!!!! not everybody feels that way!!!! and when i’m told i need to make people use the self-checkouts and i’m spending too much time ringing people up myself, i feel like that’s a little annoying!!! the job is done either way!!! better yet, i’m told to just do self-checkout for customers who refuse to do it themselves. so tell me what the point of not checking them out myself is in the first place???? maybe i just don’t handle criticism well but i just don’t see how it’s THAT big of a deal. yknow?
it’s crazy how when you’re 11 you think wow nationalism is the root of all evil and war is despicable and religion is the opiate of the masses and misogyny is everywhere and climate change is our most dire threat. and you start to grow up and you think well surely it will become more nuanced to me, surely there must be a reason adults arent breaking down wailing in the streets due to the cruelty of this world. and then you become an adult and you think wow nationalism is the root of all evil and war is despicable and religion is the opiate of the masses and misogyny is everywhere and climate change is our most dire threat
I'm serious when I say we gotta give Temmie Chang half the credit for Making Undertale (and Deltarune)
She's got an animation degree, I know the art in Undertale gets underappreciated sometimes because it's trying to evoke an older simpler style, but the art in Undertale is legit amazing and without Temmie, none of Toby's ideas would have been able to be realized (without finding some other artist and animator)
She deserves more flowers for being the one who made the vast majority of the art assets for an entire game that is one of the most commonly cited games as an influence on others (her style is so beloved and recognizeable, there's a fully complete Undertale fangame emulating it)
art history will be like "this is the most revolutionary painting of its time!" and you will look at it and is just a normal painting of a lady sitting under a tree and then an art historian will explain "this is the first time a painting ever used this specific shade of blue which challenged all understood conventions of how to depict light and launched a movement known as auzureism, and also the lady is looking at a sparrow which in its time it was a sign of fierce sexual liberation and it was considered scandalous" and then you find out the painter was expelled from the academy of art of stockholm because of the painting and that the king of sweeden paid three thousand marcs (equivallent to ten million dollars now a days) to have the painting in his room and the painting still looks like a generic painting of a lady under a tree
blakekathryn
germansingergirl
jacobvanloon
discoholicmusic
annaxmalina
romaincrisis
baratheonpilled
