“While there are definitely children who are confused, pressured, delusional, etc. “
Why are you so casually accepting the sterilisation (and other dangerous side effects of transition) of all these confused or pressured children for the sake of a few “real” trans people who will be happy with their choice? Why are you treating these confused and pressured children (most of whom are likely to be disabled and/or gay) as acceptable casualties? Why do you care so little about them? And where do you draw the line? How many disabled kids or gay kids are you okay with sterilising due to a wrong trans diagnosis?
“discredit all of the trans people who started transitioning at pretty young ages who are absolutely happy & satisfied with their choice many years later?”
We do not actually have this kind of data. The transition of children is an extremely recent phenomenon. All the trans people who started being transitioned at very young age… are still very young. We have no cohort of trans people in their 40s or 50s who were transitioned as children and can tell us how it has impacted their life. Trans children are a completely new phenomenon, there are no long-term studies of the effects of puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones on the youth, so doctors are pretty much just hoping for the best.
What doctors who treat trans youth say about the effects of puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones: “There isn’t enough research on whether someone who was on puberty blockers will regain all their bone strength, or if they might be at risk for osteoporosis in the future”, “we don’t really know how sex hormones impact any adolescent’s brain development”, “what’s lacking are specific studies that look at the neurocognitive effects of puberty blockers”, “there isn’t enough research is the impact that suppressing puberty has on brain development”, “There are so many unanswered questions around the long-term consequences.”
What the chair of the committee who drafted the guidelines of the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (who endorses the use of puberty blockers for children) says about puberty blockers: “We still don’t know the subtle or potential long-term effects on brain function or bone development. Many people recognize it’s not a benign treatment.”
“How can you discredit the experiences of adult trans people who knew DAMN well all or well close to all of their lives what was right for them.”
Well, funnily enough, a lot of trans people who started transitioning as adults have children. The majority of transwomen we hear about who started transition in their 40s or 50s have fathered several children. There are also a lot of news stories about adult trans men having children. So why are all these adult trans people who chose to have children so happy with the idea of sterilising trans kids and robbing them of the opportunity to make the same choice later in life? Don’t they see their hypocrisy when they say they wish they too could have transitioned as children, even though they all chose to have bio kids and therefore clearly wouldn’t have wanted lifelong infertility?
I find these people revolting, because they are clearly using trans children as a way to gain legitimacy for themselves (if you can even find trans toddlers, how can you say transgenderism is anything but pure and good and natural?) even though their own life choices prove that they would rather not have been transitioned (and sterilised) as children themselves.
“You can be wary about children transitioning with rationality and compassion without saying the concept of any child being trans is “horrifying on every possible level””
I don’t think any child is “truly trans”, but even if you disagree, again, where do you draw the line? I don’t know how many stories I’ve read about children who were not allowed to be gender non-conforming until they were “diagnosed as trans”, and only then did their parents start allowing them to play with their preferred toys or wear their preferred clothing, which of course resulted in the child happily embracing & clinging to their transgender identity.
I’ve lost count of how many gay people I’ve heard say that they would have definitely identified as trans (or been pressured to transition by their parents) if they had grown up in today’s climate. I’m one of them. My mother is one of them. Her first reaction when she learned about trans children was to say that her Catholic, homophobic parents would have jumped on the opportunity to turn their boyish lesbian daughter into a straight trans son - and her own internalised homophobia would have made her eager to follow their lead.
There’s an autistic woman on this post saying she would have probably been trans had she been a child/teen today. There was a survey of 200 detransitioned women going around tumblr recently, who regretted having had to face the decision to transition at such a young age. Is 200 still within the range of acceptable casualties? Do you need more? How many?
And again - 50% of the children referred to that gender identity clinic are autistic. And there are several peer-reviewed studies in the second link I gave above, showing that 95-100% of girls who persist in their transition (i.e. go from puberty blockers to cross-sex hormones which results in sterilisation) are same-sex attracted.
With everything we know about lesbian girls and autistic girls and their struggle with gender norms - why are these numbers not horrifying to you?
How many disabled children and gay children is it okay to write off as acceptable losses, and sterilise with zero certainty that they won’t come to regret it later, before we’re allowed to name the very idea of transitioning children as unethical and wrong?