Letter from an autistic autism reseacher
But I am also an autism researcher. As a researcher, I feel I have a responsibility to the autistic community to collect empirical data in only the most straightforwardly honest and ethical way possible, and to interpret such data with the utmost caution.
Letâs be frank: the scientific community has a long history of wronging autistics. We have claimed to know much more than we really did. We have claimed and indeed promised to have found so-called âmiracle curesâ. We have belittled you, and we have lied to you.
The original sin of autism research began with Bruno Bettelheim, who characterized autism as an attachment disorder in his book âThe Empty Fortressâ (charming title, right?).
According to Bettelheim, autism was caused by one thing: mothers so cold and unloving that their children would give up seeking comfort from others and turn inward. He called these mothers ârefrigerator mothersâ, and he considered the damage done by them to their children to be irreparable. The only acceptable treatment was to remove the child from their family and institutionalize them for the rest of their lives. And this was done. On the basis of this theory, mothers were torn away from their children, some forcibly so by ugly lawsuits.
One problem: there was no evidence at all that mothers of autistic children were cold. And they werenât. Autism is not caused by bad parenting. This was the first lie we told you.
You would think that by the time people came to agree that this was wrong, that weâd have learned our lesson. That we would no longer make extraordinary claims without extraordinary evidence. But we did not. People continued to search for a magic bullet: a straightforward explanation of autismâs etiology that would provide for a âquick fixâ. Something that, in all likelihood, does not exist.
Here are just a few examples of the lies weâve told you since then.
 Myth: Mercury in vaccines causes autism.
Truth: Ethyl Mercury (used a preservative in vaccines) and Methyl Mercury (toxic) are two entirely different chemical compounds. Nonetheless, mercury was removed from vaccines. Autism continued to exist. As a result of removing mercury from vaccines, the price of immunizations rose 500%, substantially raising the profit margin to be made by pharmaceutical companies. In addition, vaccines can no longer be cheaply transported across the world, when they once could be â for example, to sub-Saharan Africa.
 Myth: The MMR vaccine causes colitis, which causes autism.
Truth: This claim is based on a study done by a man named Andrew Wakefield. He used to be a doctor, but has since lost his license to practice medicine. No other author of this paper still claims authorship of it, and it has since been retracted by the journal it was published in, in a statement which called it an âelaborate fraudâ. Indeed, there is substantial evidence that Wakefield altered his data in severely unethical ways: for example, retroactively changing the diagnoses (from âno autismâ to âautismâ, for example) and developmental history (claiming that they had no previous developmental concerns when, in fact, they did) of his participants. He claimed that his patients were âconsecutively referredâ, when they were cherry-picked from an anti-MMR campaign. In reality, the entire study was funded by planned litigation against pharmaceutical companies. He even took blood samples from kids at his sonâs birthday party. Iâm not joking. And Iâve barely scratched the surface of this hoax.
Can you say âvampireâ?
As a result of this hoax, there are now large pockets of the United States which have fallen below the level of immunization required for herd immunity (the barrier that prevents the rampant spread of disease) â but these children, who are largely from wealthy families, are not the ones who are most at risk. People who simply cannot be vaccinated (ie, babies too young to receive live vaccines, or people with cancer, or HIV/AIDS, or autoimmune diseases) are the ones who are most at risk to die of horrible yet completely preventable diseases. Why? Andrew Wakefield.
And so, you see, I must apologize on behalf of the scientific community. We have wronged you and we have wronged the world. And there are some of us who continue to wrong you â to seek false âcuresâ, when no such thing should even exist.
But I want to bring hope.Â
By and large, autism researchers today are good people, aware of the mistakes of the past and not wanting to repeat them. Not all â but most. Though we must remain vigilant for the shadows in sheepâs clothing, there is still much work to be done and I think the best way to assure it is being done correctly is simple:Â
Have a voice. Be involved. Be heard. And be loud.
And, as an autistic autism researcher, Iâm doing just that.