Henri Cartier-Bresson – The Decisive Moment.
“I was on the scent of something, and I was busy smelling it out.” (p. 12) So concludes the opening paragraph of Cartier-Bresson's untitled essay. What follows are scattered reflections on how I think about my photographic practice in relation to Cartier-Bresson's own reflections.
I feel, after my first year of graduate school in studio art-photography, that I am on a scent, possibly a few scents. I don’t know if I’ve had or taken the time to be busy smelling them out, but Bresson has attuned me to being more mindful—which I take to be a good thing.
I need to think more about “photographic reportage.” I’ve been somewhat happy with my sequence of medium format shots of neolithic sites in Scotland. I think they tell an almost story (maybe still “stage management”) and that I can be more purposeful in shooting whatever sequence I choose in the future. “The page serves to reunite the complementary elements which are dispersed throughout the several photographs”--his definition of moving beyond stage management. (p. 13)
“The picture story involves a joint operation of the brain, the eye, and the heart.” (p. 13) “Things-As-They-Are offer such an abundance of material that a photographer must guard against the temptation of trying to do everything. It is essential to cut from the raw material of life—to cut and cut, but to cut with discrimination.” (p. 14)
“There is subject in all that takes place in the world, as well as in our personal universe. We cannot negate subject. It is everywhere. So we must be lucid toward what is going on in the world, and honest about what we feel.” (p. 15)
“If a photograph is to communicate its subject in all its intensity, the relationship of form must be rigorously established. Photography implies the recognition of a rhythm in the world of real things. What the eye does is to find and focus on the particular subject within the mass of reality… In a photograph, composition is the result of a simultaneous coalition, the organic coordination of elements seen by the eye. One does not add composition as though it were an afterthought superimposed on the basic subject material, since it is impossible to separate content from form. Composition must have its own inevitability about it.” (p. 17)
And... “But inside movement there is one moment at which the elements in motion are in balance. Photography must seize upon this moment and hold immobile the equilibrium of it.” (p. 17)
For me, these portions of the first half of the reading come down to composition, even though composition gets its own separate section (following “The Subject” and “The Picture-story). Composition is at the fore in the individual shot as well as at a meta-level of the Picture-story. I had never thought that through before. It seems obvious now.
“To me, photography is the simultaneous recognition, in a fraction of a second, of the significance of an event as well as of a precise organization of forms which give that event its proper expression.”
Food for thought and, again, mindful attentiveness in that decisive moment.
P.S. I also have to say that I had a chuckle over this: “I hope we never see the day when photos shops sell little schema grills to clamp onto our viewfinders; and the Golden Rule will never be found etched on our ground glass.” He both foresaw and probably never could have imagined modern digital cameras that do precisely this and more (and, of course, Photoshop).