I'd rather be in outer space šø
macklin celebrini has autism

ellievsbear

ā

romaā
noise dept.
Mike Driver
KIROKAZE
d e v o n

ā

Origami Around

Kaledo Art
almost home
šŖ¼
we're not kids anymore.
Today's Document

PR's Tumblrdome

ē„ę„ / Permanent Vacation
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
RMH
seen from Chile

seen from United States

seen from India
seen from Malaysia
seen from China

seen from United States

seen from Netherlands

seen from United States
seen from Chile
seen from Uzbekistan
seen from France
seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from Guyana
seen from Bangladesh

seen from Philippines

seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from Vietnam
seen from United States
@rockandrollbuckaro
He had just committed murder and the police were after him, but nooo, he had to take his boyfriend's coat and do a drama queen little scene in the rain. He's such a teenage girl
idk man everyone always talks about the āis hannibal⦠in love⦠with me?ā scene from the lens of like,,, a teenager with an obvious crush,, but thereās so much horror in that scene, too. the dawning realization that a man like that can love and that will is the one he loves. the pain of being wholly beloved and understood by someone who only burns, who consumes even as he creates. the inescapable knowledge that what they had was real; that hannibalās cruelty was motivated in part by heartbreak. idk
Well because we don't have a Hannibal souvenir shop, the rule is that any souvenir you buy from Florence is a Hannibal souvenir
Since thereās evidence to show Johnās interest in Paul (in that he feels rejected by him), what do you think of the evidence suggesting Paul maybe felt similar feelings, if not to a lesser āinterestedā degree? Similar to how Philip Normanās phrasing of ābohemians should try everythingā minimizes Johnās feelings for Paul, I feel like the dude-fandom-writers āromanticizingā of Paulās pining for John (so that John is seen as the strong one/hero) has actually washed down Paulās true feelings as well
Hi listener!
This is a great question.Ā You make an excellent point- that the fannish tendency of writers (looking at you Doggett and Lewisohn!) to position Paul as forever smitten by and pining for an indifferent, dismissive John probably obscures Paulās true feelings as well.
Having said that, we arenāt aware of any evidence that suggests Paul had āsimilarā (i.e. sexual) feelings for John.Ā Of course itās possible, but entertaining this idea would be pure speculation.Ā However, if you know of any evidence whatsoever (i.e. testimony from Paul or his intimates) that Paul wanted an affair with John, please let us know.
Paul is SO much more publicly forthcoming about his love for John than vice verse.Ā We see this as both a blessing and a curse.Ā On one hand, Paulās testimony is very informative about the depth of their relationship.Ā On the other hand, it gives a lopsided impression of their feelings for each other, and gives ammunition to those who wish to see the relationship as lopsided.
As we point out on the podcast, 95% of Paulās loving comments were made after Johnās death.Ā But even in 1970, as Paul was attempting to finalize the divorce, he was able to articulate to the press several times (i.e. to John, through the newspaper) that he loved John.Ā To our ears this doesnāt sound ādesperateā or āthirstyā but quite the opposite!Ā To us it sounds like Paul is trying to soften the blow of his departure, reassuring John that despite the mess of the break-up, John is still valued and loved.Ā Again, YMMV, but to us this sounds like it comes from a place of maturity and true, deep compassion.Ā Ā
One thing we do believe is that Paul did cherish being the most important person in Johnās life and perhaps Paulās (romantic, possessive) feelings may have gotten murky by ā68 when Yoko entered the scene and Paul realized his position as #1 might be threatened.Ā By 1970 (when he commits to the divorce), Paul is able to articulate that he was jealous of Yoko when she first arrived, indicating that he is aware of his feelings and capable of taking responsibility for them.Ā Ā
By 1985, Paul understands and is able to say aloud that he was ālike (Johnās) girlfriendā so he recognizes that they are like a couple (in terms of intensity of emotion).Ā However he also makes the point that he couldnāt fight for John because he was ānot a girl.āĀ While this is somewhat open to interpretation, it sounds to us as if the stumbling block in Paulās mind is mismatched gender; they love each other but are both guys, so therefore it doesnāt work (at least in Paulās heterosexual mind).Ā Maybe in another lifetime, another incarnation⦠But not this one.Ā So Paul stepped aside.
Whereas John seemed to have loved and wanted Paul as he was. i.e. John loved Paul the man, as a man.
Is it possible thereās more to the story?Ā Sure.Ā But if there is, we simply donāt have those details.Ā And we believe the way both John and Paul continued to struggle with comprehending and defining their relationship throughout their lives was genuine.Ā Our best evidence is that while they werenāt lovers, they were something more than friends and they probably existed in this indefinable middle ground for a long time.Ā Paul seems to have dropped enough hints/taunts (on RAM, for example) to indicate that he was aware of some underlying sexual tension between them, and that he was aware of Johnās desire for him. So even if Paul wasnāt interested in or willing to pursue a sexual relationship, he did seem willing to fan the flames and probably greatly enjoyed being desired, and sometimes deliberately stoked the heat between them.
Ultimately, John and Paul reached some sort of impasse in 1968-69, and we DO know that John contemplated an affair with Paul (and was deterred because he believed Paul was straight and therefore uninterested).Ā This is the actual information we have, and therefore what our assumptions are based on.
We definitely believe Paul loved and missed John throughout the 70s, and continues to love and miss John now.Ā We also believe that John & Paul had a special connection that they both found impossible to replicate.Ā Again, the main difference is that Paul is (at least now) much more able and willing to articulate these things without shame.Ā
Which gets to the bigger point.Ā We find the major difference in what John and Paul are willing to admit about each other somehow involves internalized shame.Ā Paul simply doesnāt exhibit the shame John does on this subject.Ā Paulās ability to wax poetic about how John had beautiful hands, for example, reflects to us a lack of embarrassment about his feelings.Ā Ā Johnās ability to speak openly about his love for Paul was much more compromised, often coinciding with his level of comfort with his own sexuality. (You can do the math on that one). And vitally, what John said behind closed doors about Paul (to Yoko, to Harry Nilsson, to his own diaries, etc) was often more revealing than what he said in public.
I sometimes feel like the fandom displays an overwhelming desire for equivalence in this area, I guess because this is more palatable?Ā But John and Paul were of course, individuals with separate identities (sexual and otherwise) and by the time they broke up we do believe they wanted different things. Also, fans and authors alike tend to show resistance towards allowing Paul to have multiple and complex emotions like they allow for John.Ā So while we do think John was the center of Paulās universe in the 60s, we also think Paul had other interests, attractions, and loves and this is seldom acknowledged. So although we always consider their love deep and mutual, we do acknowledge that their wants and needs occasionally fell out of sync and caused hurt feelings on both sides.
Also, the fandom seems to underestimate Paulās incredible powers of seduction, and his natural inclination to flirt.Ā And the authorship (who is apparently 24/7 horny for Lennon) seems in literal denial about Paulās desirability.Ā We feel this also drastically skews the read on the Lennon/McCartney dynamic.
"You were supposed to leave."
"We couldn't leave without you."
I love it how in Mƶtley Crüe, when the terror twins are together, one of them does something stupid and the other one just goes along with it and is just like āWell, this is what we do now, Iām okay with it.ā
they literally canāt show me a tv character using an ipad because I will joke about it forever I just think there is something so funny about a character using an ipad. whatās he doing on there. hannibal lecter, armand, etc
Tommy Lee // Pics that make me lose it
i know pirates of the caribbean would have never been made today (on-location practical effects film) but if it WAS...
we'd absolutely have another "Introducing Disney's First Ever LGBT Character!!" moment, and of course everyone would be like "oh yeah, jack sparrow is bisexual, we're aware, got it." and then disney would be like "No."
and so we'd be like, "Oh, okay, Pintel and Ragetti are definitely not related and there's something homeoerotic going on there. Cool. We support that." and disney would go "No..."
and then they'd point to this fucking picture
"Maccus, the shark-headed first mate, has unrequited feelings for Davy Jones..." and there'd be an approximately 0.5 second scene where Maccus looks at Davy out of the corner of his 3rd eye and goes "Davy....." and Davy ignores him and disney is like "We're so brave for this."
and it'd be another goddamn gaston/le fou situation where half of y'all would be going "oh my god slayyyy love is reeaaalll" while the other half are pointing out how weirdly homophobic it is to have the cursed, PERPETUALLY DAMNED, ANIMAL-LIKE men be hinted as gay
and the fanart would be vile
my new mission in life is to make potc fancams but only to azealia banks songs btw
Keira Knightley as Elizabeth Swann
Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest
look! the moonlight shows us for what we really are. we are not among the living, and so we cannot die ā but neither are we dead.