nick mcphail
No title available
macklin celebrini has autism

bliss lane
YOU ARE THE REASON
official daine visual archive

Andulka
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
The Stonewall Inn
NASA
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
Cosmic Funnies
Noah Kahan
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
almost home

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵

blake kathryn
No title available
tumblr dot com

Product Placement
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Iraq

seen from Malaysia
seen from Colombia

seen from Italy
seen from Türkiye
seen from Mexico
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Malaysia
seen from Hong Kong SAR China

seen from Malaysia
seen from Russia
seen from United States
seen from India
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Canada

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from United States
@rodrigves
nick mcphail
The Godfather (1972)
@kaelaniamari
Self-Portrait as a Heel, Part Two, 1982, Jean-Michel Basquiat
The obvious first question, to anyone who agrees with this, is: have you actually thought about the definition of masculinity you’re using? Where, and when it comes from? And might it be relevant to note that any definition of masculinity has consequences for how women are seen? Because any era likely being referred to here would have defined masculinity in opposition to a femininity which limited women’s roles in Western society. If that is truly what you want to return to then at least make it clear, but if you just don’t like men wearing ‘feminine clothes’ then say that.
And why are we supposed to take it as an obvious fact that societies can’t survive without your definition of ‘strong men’, as if this was empirically proven by the many that have fallen throughout history due to a lack of masculinity. There are certainly plenty of societies and civilisations that are no longer around despite conforming to a conservative definition of masculinity.
I really tried to understand how a singer in a dress is part of an existential threat to Western society but ultimately the threat posed isn’t to Western society per se but to a specific vision of what it should be, a vision conservatism already lost the fight to preserve.
Moving Past the Trump Era
When I think of what stands between Left and Right in the U.S my first thought is not a set of differing political opinions. Instead, I think of the hatred between the two sides, the twitter feuds, misinformation, trolling, conspiracy theories, and clashes between protestors. I think of a right which cannot stand the anti-free speech, America-hating snowflakes on the left, and a left which detests the racist, uneducated, insane people on the right.
The problem this raises for democracy is obvious: it is impossible to sit two people down for a discussion of how best to proceed in tackling a political problem when both parties are convinced that the views of the other side are dangerous, fundamentally immoral, come from a place of hatred for the nation, or arise out of a false sense of superiority, or simply out of stupidity. This is not to say that there are no bad ideas, only that when this becomes our default image of a person with opposing views ‘political discussions’ become an exercise in proving other people stupid, dangerous, immoral, etc. A stable democracy is very difficult to maintain under these terms, and people will never be convinced to change their minds simply by being told that they are dangerous idiots.
So how do we move on from our current state? It is tempting to think that we slowly drifted into this current state and so similar forces will see us drift out. On the contrary, it took a lot of work to get us here, and it will take even more to get us out.
Thankfully, it begins at the individual level. There is something we can all do, which would make a massive difference: abandon the idea that people with opposing political views are enemies, and rethink the end-goal of our political interactions. You do not have to find common ground with every individual you speak to. You do not have to convince or be convinced. You do not need to arrive at definitive conclusions or gain concession. Democracies will be well served if those who currently spend their time virtually shouting at each other in YouTube comment sections begin to think of political interactions as an opportunity to teach and learn a new perspective.
At the moment much of the dialogue that takes place between those on the left and right may just as well be between people speaking different languages. They certainly seem, more often than not, to be interactions between people using completely different methods for understanding the world around them. Fostering an environment in which people make the effort to understand each other, even if maintaining disagreement, is the first step towards making political interactions practical and useful. This kind of shift in thinking is hard, and will be impossible when speaking to certain people, but if enough of us make it a habit we will be able to move on from the exhausting state that has characterised the Trump Era.
Black Panther, 1970s
ig: aacurls
Salman Toor (Pakistani, b. 1983), Bar Boy, 2019. Oil on plywood, 48 x 60 in.