Logical Fallacies in Hound of the Baskervilles
Something that makes every single mystery (especially a murder mystery) much more interesting is the use of herrings.
No, not the literal nasty smelling fish âherringâ - the âherringâ that is used to enhance the âplot twistsâ and throw a wrench in reader theories while reading a mystery.Â
The most notable of these is the âRed Herringâ, officially defined as âa logical fallacy in which someone deliberately introduces an irrelevant subject or topic to throw an argument off course or divert peopleâs attentionâ. In words that arenât the dictionaryâs, a Red Herring in a mystery is essentially the person framed with seemingly-obvious evidence to make the reader believe they committed the crime, but didnât actually do it.
Conan Doyle uses the Red Herring fallacy in Hound of the Baskervilles by pointing out correlation between the escaped convict and another murder, and also between the butler Barrymore and his tendency to walk around the house late at night (and also coincidentally have a beard) in the same way that the suspect does.
Examples of Red Herrings in other famous literary works include:
Severus Snape in Harry Potter and the Sorcererâs Stone: (Harry, Ron, and Hermione all thought he was trying to steal the Stone when it was actually Professor Quirrell) (honestlyâŠSnape in the whole series)
Malcolm in The Sixth Sense: turns out he was literally dead the entire time and isnât just a child psychologist but a dead child psychologist with unfinished business who isnât really helping his patient not talk to dead people at all.
Disneyâs Frozen:Â Elsa seems like the bad guy, but itâs actually Hans, who later gets punched in the face by Ana, which is glorious.
Rick Riordanâs The Lightning Thief:Â Percy believes that Hades is the one who is trying to destroy Mount Olympus (which would make sense), but it turns out to be Luke instead.