That was important, Should have asked that first

I'm doing bloggy things! Ask me questions, maybe!

[shouldhaveaskedthatfirst]

"Your blog's layout hurts my eyes, and I'm dead. Change it." ((Mun thinks it's hilarious but ok hehehe))

You, sir, are merely an unsophisticated cretin! My blog's layout is the very IMAGE of intelligence! 

[testinginitiative-deactivated20]

Ooh look at me, I'm Glados. I'm a potato stuck on a wall. Look at me and my italicized fonts. I'm so important. Testing testing testing. BLah blah blah. - Anonymous Wheatley

There is so much wrong with this pathetic attempt at an insult, I don’t even know where to begin.

[shouldhaveaskedthatfirst]

I demand PROOF that that was me! You don’t know!

[testinginitiative-deactivated20]

[shouldhaveaskedthatfirst]

Well that's just a load of old gibberish. Numbers don't intimidate me anymore, mate!

[testinginitiative-deactivated20]

Ooh look at me, I'm Glados. I'm a potato stuck on a wall. Look at me and my italicized fonts. I'm so important. Testing testing testing. BLah blah blah. - Anonymous Wheatley

There is so much wrong with this pathetic attempt at an insult, I don’t even know where to begin.

[shouldhaveaskedthatfirst]

I demand PROOF that that was me! You don't know!

[shouldhaveaskedthatfirst]

I tried to teach the space core Aristotle once.

He didn't listen. 

[shouldhaveaskedthatfirst]

Eugh. Is that seriously what you're calling it to try to, what, entice people into asking you questions? All allowing for questions is going to do is give more opportunity for the world to see how stupid you are. On second thought, keep it open. Let's see what answers your big, fat, moronic head can come up with.

An encyclopedia (also spelled encyclopaedia or encyclopædia)[1] is a type ofreference work – a compendium holding a summary of information from either all branches of knowledge or a particular branch of knowledge.[2] Encyclopedias are divided into articles or entries, which are usually accessed alphabetically by article name.[3] Encyclopedia entries are longer and more detailed than those in mostdictionaries.[3] Generally speaking, unlike dictionary entries, which focus on linguisticinformation about words, encyclopedia articles focus on factual information to cover the thing or concept for which the article name stands.[4][5][6][7]

Encyclopedias have existed for around 2,000 years; the oldest still in existence,Naturalis Historia, was written in ca. AD 77 by Pliny the Elder. The modern encyclopedia evolved out of dictionaries around the 17th century. Historically, some encyclopedias were contained in one volume, but some, such as the Encyclopædia Britannica or the world’s largest Enciclopedia universal ilustrada europeo-americana, became huge multi-volume works. Some modern encyclopedias, such as Wikipedia, are electronic and are often freely available.

The word encyclopedia comes from the Koine Greek ἐγκύκλιος παιδεία,[8] transliterated enkyklios paideia, meaning “general education” fromenkyklios (ἐγκύκλιος), meaning “circular, recurrent, required regularly, general”[9] and paideia (παιδεία), meaning “education, rearing of a child”;[10] it was reduced to a single word due to an error[11] by copyists of Latin manuscripts. Together, the phrase literally translates as “complete instruction” or “complete knowledge”.

[testinginitiative-deactivated20]

What does five seconds on google, looking up the word encyclopedia have to do with how stupid you look, begging people to poke at something that doesn’t exist?

Copy pasting wikipedia does not make you smart, by the way.

[shouldhaveaskedthatfirst]

well, I bet you don’t even know what ilustrada europeo-americana means!

[testinginitiative-deactivated20]

Oh, some of the data from that article managed to stick. Be careful what you waste your limited capacity on, otherwise you might end up spouting even more nonsense, and somehow mange to make it even stupider than the other modules in the reject bin, where you belong.

[shouldhaveaskedthatfirst]

I am a LOT smarter than rick! YOU SHUT UP!

[testinginitiative-deactivated20]

If only that were verifiably true, you might be able to justify your contnued existence.

[shouldhaveaskedthatfirst]

You put me next that that machismo moron and I WILL prove it!

[shouldhaveaskedthatfirst]

Eugh. Is that seriously what you're calling it to try to, what, entice people into asking you questions? All allowing for questions is going to do is give more opportunity for the world to see how stupid you are. On second thought, keep it open. Let's see what answers your big, fat, moronic head can come up with.

An encyclopedia (also spelled encyclopaedia or encyclopædia)[1] is a type ofreference work – a compendium holding a summary of information from either all branches of knowledge or a particular branch of knowledge.[2] Encyclopedias are divided into articles or entries, which are usually accessed alphabetically by article name.[3] Encyclopedia entries are longer and more detailed than those in mostdictionaries.[3] Generally speaking, unlike dictionary entries, which focus on linguisticinformation about words, encyclopedia articles focus on factual information to cover the thing or concept for which the article name stands.[4][5][6][7]

Encyclopedias have existed for around 2,000 years; the oldest still in existence,Naturalis Historia, was written in ca. AD 77 by Pliny the Elder. The modern encyclopedia evolved out of dictionaries around the 17th century. Historically, some encyclopedias were contained in one volume, but some, such as the Encyclopædia Britannica or the world’s largest Enciclopedia universal ilustrada europeo-americana, became huge multi-volume works. Some modern encyclopedias, such as Wikipedia, are electronic and are often freely available.

The word encyclopedia comes from the Koine Greek ἐγκύκλιος παιδεία,[8] transliterated enkyklios paideia, meaning “general education” fromenkyklios (ἐγκύκλιος), meaning “circular, recurrent, required regularly, general”[9] and paideia (παιδεία), meaning “education, rearing of a child”;[10] it was reduced to a single word due to an error[11] by copyists of Latin manuscripts. Together, the phrase literally translates as “complete instruction” or “complete knowledge”.

[testinginitiative-deactivated20]

What does five seconds on google, looking up the word encyclopedia have to do with how stupid you look, begging people to poke at something that doesn’t exist?

Copy pasting wikipedia does not make you smart, by the way.

[shouldhaveaskedthatfirst]

well, I bet you don’t even know what ilustrada europeo-americana means!

[testinginitiative-deactivated20]

Oh, some of the data from that article managed to stick. Be careful what you waste your limited capacity on, otherwise you might end up spouting even more nonsense, and somehow mange to make it even stupider than the other modules in the reject bin, where you belong.

[shouldhaveaskedthatfirst]

I am a LOT smarter than rick! YOU SHUT UP!

[shouldhaveaskedthatfirst]

Eugh. Is that seriously what you're calling it to try to, what, entice people into asking you questions? All allowing for questions is going to do is give more opportunity for the world to see how stupid you are. On second thought, keep it open. Let's see what answers your big, fat, moronic head can come up with.

An encyclopedia (also spelled encyclopaedia or encyclopædia)[1] is a type ofreference work – a compendium holding a summary of information from either all branches of knowledge or a particular branch of knowledge.[2] Encyclopedias are divided into articles or entries, which are usually accessed alphabetically by article name.[3] Encyclopedia entries are longer and more detailed than those in mostdictionaries.[3] Generally speaking, unlike dictionary entries, which focus on linguisticinformation about words, encyclopedia articles focus on factual information to cover the thing or concept for which the article name stands.[4][5][6][7]

Encyclopedias have existed for around 2,000 years; the oldest still in existence,Naturalis Historia, was written in ca. AD 77 by Pliny the Elder. The modern encyclopedia evolved out of dictionaries around the 17th century. Historically, some encyclopedias were contained in one volume, but some, such as the Encyclopædia Britannica or the world’s largest Enciclopedia universal ilustrada europeo-americana, became huge multi-volume works. Some modern encyclopedias, such as Wikipedia, are electronic and are often freely available.

The word encyclopedia comes from the Koine Greek ἐγκύκλιος παιδεία,[8] transliterated enkyklios paideia, meaning “general education” fromenkyklios (ἐγκύκλιος), meaning “circular, recurrent, required regularly, general”[9] and paideia (παιδεία), meaning “education, rearing of a child”;[10] it was reduced to a single word due to an error[11] by copyists of Latin manuscripts. Together, the phrase literally translates as “complete instruction” or “complete knowledge”.

[testinginitiative-deactivated20]

What does five seconds on google, looking up the word encyclopedia have to do with how stupid you look, begging people to poke at something that doesn’t exist?

Copy pasting wikipedia does not make you smart, by the way.

[shouldhaveaskedthatfirst]

well, I bet you don't even know what ilustrada europeo-americana means!

[shouldhaveaskedthatfirst]

Eugh. Is that seriously what you're calling it to try to, what, entice people into asking you questions? All allowing for questions is going to do is give more opportunity for the world to see how stupid you are. On second thought, keep it open. Let's see what answers your big, fat, moronic head can come up with.

An encyclopedia (also spelled encyclopaedia or encyclopædia)[1] is a type ofreference work – a compendium holding a summary of information from either all branches of knowledge or a particular branch of knowledge.[2] Encyclopedias are divided into articles or entries, which are usually accessed alphabetically by article name.[3] Encyclopedia entries are longer and more detailed than those in mostdictionaries.[3] Generally speaking, unlike dictionary entries, which focus on linguisticinformation about words, encyclopedia articles focus on factual information to cover the thing or concept for which the article name stands.[4][5][6][7]

Encyclopedias have existed for around 2,000 years; the oldest still in existence,Naturalis Historia, was written in ca. AD 77 by Pliny the Elder. The modern encyclopedia evolved out of dictionaries around the 17th century. Historically, some encyclopedias were contained in one volume, but some, such as the Encyclopædia Britannica or the world’s largest Enciclopedia universal ilustrada europeo-americana, became huge multi-volume works. Some modern encyclopedias, such as Wikipedia, are electronic and are often freely available.

The word encyclopedia comes from the Koine Greek ἐγκύκλιος παιδεία,[8] transliterated enkyklios paideia, meaning “general education” fromenkyklios (ἐγκύκλιος), meaning “circular, recurrent, required regularly, general”[9] and paideia (παιδεία), meaning “education, rearing of a child”;[10] it was reduced to a single word due to an error[11] by copyists of Latin manuscripts. Together, the phrase literally translates as “complete instruction” or “complete knowledge”.

[shouldhaveaskedthatfirst]

I’ll admit I was looking for something else at the time, but a burn is a burn.

[testinginitiative-deactivated20]

It wasn’t even funny.

[shouldhaveaskedthatfirst]

Well, not to you, obviously. It's YOUR burn!

[shouldhaveaskedthatfirst]

Oh go change a lightbulb!

[testinginitiative-deactivated20]

How long did it take you to dig that up? Or did you need help?

[shouldhaveaskedthatfirst]

I'll admit I was looking for something else at the time, but a burn is a burn.

[shouldhaveaskedthatfirst]

Well, that’s your opinion, clearly.

But I’m not sure the opinions of vegetables should be considered.

[testinginitiative-deactivated20]

No, it’s an objective fact.

Oh you did not just bring that up.

[shouldhaveaskedthatfirst]

Oh go change a lightbulb!

[shouldhaveaskedthatfirst]

gladlydoingscience answered your post: There is a distinct lack of tumbling o…

Is this some sort of joke?

No, that wasn’t a joke. But if you want a joke, I can tell you a joke.

A turret, a human, and a computer walk into a bar.

….

YOUR FACE!

HAH!

[testinginitiative-deactivated20]

………………………………. Your IQ has somehow managed to drop even lower than when I last saw you. That’s just sad, I’d weep for the loss, but…well, we both know there wasn’t much to lose.

[shouldhaveaskedthatfirst]

Well, that’s your opinion, clearly.

But I’m not sure the opinions of vegetables should be considered.

[shouldhaveaskedthatfirst]

gladlydoingscience answered your post: There is a distinct lack of tumbling o...

Is this some sort of joke?

No, that wasn't a joke. But if you want a joke, I can tell you a joke.

A turret, a human, and a computer walk into a bar.

....

YOUR FACE!

HAH!

[shouldhaveaskedthatfirst]

There is a distinct lack of tumbling on this site.

Is that why the E is missing?