The Pregnant Angels of São Francisco
In Salvador, in the Bahia region of Brazil, the church dedicated to São Francisco is one of the highest examples of Baroque-Portuguese architecture, with gilded sculptures carved of wood to look like flowers, angels, birds, and scrollwork. As many have noted, the church is rich with irony because its namesake, Saint Francis, was devoted to the poor, yet it is said to be the most opulent church in all of Brazil, with nearly one ton of gold leaf covering its ornate wooden interiors. The gold was mined by African slaves in the region called Mina Gerais, in the Southeast. But there’s also a matter of some debate, at least among the various tour guides in Salvador — as to whether the church contains traces of an artistic rebellion committed by the enslaved craftsmen who did the intricate carving.
The angels, I was told when I first visited the church in 2019, were purposefully made to look pregnant by the enslaved persons who did the labor of carrying out the vision of the artists.
One interpretation is that this was a subtle act of resistance to call into question the purity of the church. The portrait of pregnant cherubim materializes the paradox of the São Francisco church in grotesque form: giving glory to God (and to the Saint most associated at that time with the vow of poverty) with a visible display of the labor of enslaved persons, first in the mines, and then in the church itself.
An academic article by Mattijs van de Port confirms this detail about the pregnant angels, if only to trouble the legend:
“Are these angels really angels? Many offer their nakedness to the congregation as ever so many flashers. Some seem pregnant. Some have remarkably erect nipples. Some look at us as would a prostitute soliciting at a street corner. Most of them boast silly smiles and other rather idiotic facial expressions, so stupid that you can’t help thinking that the slaves who did the woodcarving must have had a good laugh mocking the facial expressions of their Portuguese masters (a point that is also stressed by the black tour guides who take tourists into the church and help them ‘read’ the interior).” (p. 69)
The author seems to suggest that the tour guides have invented the narrative of the pregnant angels.[1] Van de Port is more invested in reading the dizzying ocular play of the baroque of the church, and the angels’ undecidability becomes subsumed to this interpretation. The article would be useful to anyone interested in the problematic ways that art historians have discussed the church and especially the insulting characterization of the Brazilian baroque as more sexualized, fecund (as if this were somehow related to blackness and the tropical climate) than even typical Baroque overabundance.[2] I have not yet done substantial research to find out if others comment on the pregnant angels, but van de Port’s article provides a literature review of various takes on the church’s architecture. My next step in researching this will be to follow the sources that van de Port cites, including João Adolfo Hansen’s discussion of the São Francisco church.
But even among tour guides there is disagreement, and some have varying degrees of confidence in this interpretation of the pregnant angels. Some say it was a willful, artful, and subtle act of resistance, calculated to thread the needle of plausible deniability. Others say that the craftsmen had no understanding of what an angel should look like and took as their models for the human form prostitutes in the area, which accounts for the varying sizes of swollen bellies. Of course, there might have been other reasons that most, but not all, of the cherubs, have distended bellies—perhaps it’s malnutrition and not pregnancy that they meant to convey.
Regardless, there is more overt sex in this church than most. My group was told that the cherubs were initially given sex characteristics by the craftsmen, but this was deemed inappropriate, and the sculptures were eventually castrated.[3] There are also adult female forms with bare breasts, which our tour guide said are meant to approximate “nymphs,” and which I found as surprising as the pregnant putti. There is a Greek tinge to the baroque architecture in the columns, the nymphs (or seraphim?) and cupid-inspired angels. The “Atlantic columns,” so called because they depict a human form at the base holding up the structure, like Atlantis, seem especially apt in this institute of national of historic and artistic heritage (declared as such in 1937). Whether or not the angels are meant to look pregnant, these columns, and the church’s display of colonial wealth, remind us that it was the enslaved body that was supporting the whole of Portuguese Brazil, with its labors.
Salvador e a Bahia de todos os santos. Junta de Andalucia, Brazil, 2012.
van de Port, Mattijs. “Golden Storm: The Ecstasy of the Igreja de São Francisco in Salvador da
Bahia, Brazil”in Religious Architecture Anthropological Perspectives; ed. by
Oskar Verkaaik, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam 2013,p. 63-82
[1] No mention of this detail is made in the entry on the church in the guidebook to Salvador’s architecture Salvador e a Bahia de todos os santos, but it is frequently referenced on travel blogs, presented alongside facts such as that construction was begun in 1708 and work on the church said to have taken 150 years; that ceiling paintings were done by noted artist Jose Joaquim de Rocha 1774; that another aspect of the church’s wealth is to be seen in the installation of 37 hand-painted tile murals imported from Portugal in the adjacent convent. For a sampling of such travel blogs, see https://www.bahia.ws/en/igreja-da-ordem-terceira-de-sao-francisco/; https://franks-travelbox.com/en/suedamerika/brasilien/bilder-igreja-de-sao-francisco-in-salvador-da-bahia/; and https://travelswithsheila.com/magnificent-st-francis-church-convent-salvador.html.
[2] See especially on this point discussion of Affonso Avila “hinting at the ‘semiotic exuberance’ of the interior and ‘the insertion of African elements and sensibilities’” and David Underwood, who claimed the Brazilian Baroque “delighted in the tumescence of carnal forms, in the provocative swelling of the flesh’” (qtd. In van de Port, 72).
Photo above by Donyel Hobbes Williams; all others by the author.
[3] This is confirmed by van de Port’s research: “Talento and Hollanda (2008: 79) tell us that many of the angels and cherubs originally had genitals, but these were at some point in time cut off by Franciscan friars, presumably trying to police the boundary between ecstatic worship and erotic stimulation. They were donned with little culottes, which – in a continuation of the striptease act – were taken off again in later stages..” (Page 70)