This website is retarded. Oh shit I think I sharted. My time is up. Up I must, and change my darkened drawers.
who are you
Today's Document
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ

bliss lane
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
noise dept.
KIROKAZE

#extradirty
Claire Keane

Love Begins
NASA
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Misplaced Lens Cap

JVL
🪼
No title available

No title available
No title available

PR's Tumblrdome
The Bowery Presents
No title available

seen from United States

seen from Australia
seen from Lebanon
seen from Chile
seen from United States

seen from T1
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Brazil
seen from Brazil

seen from Argentina
seen from Argentina
@socialughjustice
This website is retarded. Oh shit I think I sharted. My time is up. Up I must, and change my darkened drawers.
who are you
lmao
How do you all feel about these High School graduates announcing they're undocumented? On one hand, I'm proud of everything they've accomplished. On the other, they were attending public high schools that are mainly funded by tax payers.
I honestly don’t care. -c1
just because your an illegal immigrant doesn't mean y'all don't pay taxes... - the blonde one
Can You See Why People Are Angry About This Gap Kids Ad?
Whether or not it was intended to convey a message of subservience, it doesn’t mean that viewers, including young Black girls, won’t perceive it as such and be harmed by the subtext. And guess how seriously Gap is taking their feedback.
i can see why people are angry about it, it’s because y’all are fuckin ridiculous and want to whine, bitch, and moan about everything. even stupid clothing ads that have featured the exact same thing just with the races switched
just no one freaked out about it because we aren’t crybabies looking for reasons to be offended. thats what i’m seeing
I just cant even with this shit. People want to make everything racist. Christ.
If everything is racist, nothing is racist.
Dm me pictures of koalas The blonde one
tumblr user subconsciously realising that wealth is the only real privilege
Dm me pictures of possums The blonde one
Arab One, is it common to call women in general "lady" in arabic? Because where I live it's definitely not, but a lot of arabic customers at my work would call me lady, and I'm curious if it's something from their own language that just got carried over.
It’s not common among strangers. We have a word which literally means ‘woman’ but it’s not used in normal conversation. Some people say it as a joke but depending on the area, people will consider it rude. If those customers don’t know your name, it may be because they don’t know any other equivalents like Miss/Madam.
10 Things More Likely To Kill You Than Islamic Terror
By : Zero Hedge Published on : 12/12/2015 5:00:00 PM
Submitted by Carey Wedler via TheAntiMedia.org,
Guided by talking heads, American armchair warriors spout vitriol, increasingly calling to either treat Muslims like Jews in the Third Reich or simply bomb them into oblivion — and their cognitive dissonance is glaring. These contradictions are evident not least in the paralyzing fear so many ‘Mericans feel toward Muslims who courageously call for soldiers to do their bidding in the Middle East. Their crippling fear of Islamic terror, itself, is cloaked in contradiction.
According to an analysis by the New America Foundation, Islamic terror attacks in the United States have led to the deaths of 45 people since 9/11. While 45 deaths is 45 too many, the dizzying fear of Islamic extremism currently sweeping the nation is objectively overblown.
Considering Islamic terror killing an average of 3.2 Americans per year (45 deaths divided by 14 years) since late 2001, here are ten causes of death more worthy of their fear:
1. Television: TV might be linked to earlier deaths among those who watch more than a few hours a day, but more concretely, the devices themselves kill 176 people a year. Literally. They fall on people. That’s 55 times more deaths than Islamic terror claims annually.
2. Fireworks: According to the Consumer Product Safety Commission, celebrating the 4th of July might be more deadly than Islamic terror attacks. The organization reports an average of 7.1 deaths per year — meaning Americans are more likely to blow themselves up than be eviscerated by the jihadist bombers they so fear.
3. Cows: Yes, cows. According to the CDC, cattle slay an average of 20 Americans every year. While these deaths occur mostly among farm workers, dogs kill 28 Americans per year, spiders kill seven, and venomous lizards and snakes kill six. All of these animals are still more likely to kill an American than the caliphate and other Islamic boogeymen.
4. Elevators: While the fear of dying as a result of an elevator malfunction has probably plagued many Americans at one time or another, such a worry is likely fleeting. However, if Americans are truly concerned with “common sense,” a virtue Donald Trump frequently touts, they would do well to readjust their phobias. Elevators kill 27 Americans per year, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Consumer Product Safety Commission.
5. Choking: Americans will sooner perish from choking on food or other objects than from an Islamic terror attack. At least 2,500 people per year are killed by this type of asphyxiation — 781 times more than from a jihadi assault. Hot dogs are particularly menacing. Perhaps we should ban them in the same vein as Trump’s proposed ban on Muslims. Then again, killing fewer cows to grind up for beef dogs might lead to an uptick in cattle-on-human violence. America is at a perilous crossroads.
6. Lightning: People often quip that one is “more likely to be struck by lightning” when they want to highlight an event’s improbability. However, even as the number of deaths from lightning decreases over the long-term, it is still higher than the number of people killed by Muslim terror attacks each year. Forty-nine people per year die from being struck by lightning — more than 15 times the rate of death from Islamic extremist murders.
7. Car accidents: Though most Americans are aware of the high risk of death by car accident, this knowledge doesn’t mitigate their extreme Islamophobia. The Association for Safe International Road Travel estimates about 37,000 Americans die each year in vehicular accidents, over 11,562 times the number killed by Muslim fanatics.
8. Heart Attacks: Heart attacks are one of America’s leading killers, claiming 190,625 times more American lives than Islamic terror. 610,000 Americans die from heart attacks per year. Cancer kills 589,430 Americans annually, and diabetes is the main cause of death for 69,071 Americans per year. They are responsible for astronomically more fatalities than radical Islamic terror.
9. Police: According to a three-year average of American police killings logged by killedbypolice.net — a more comprehensive database than the federal government’s — police killed 998 people on average per year from 2013-2015. That’s roughly 312 times the average annual number of people killed by Islamic extremists since 9/11. The average number of people killed by Islamic terrorism in the last three years is 7.7 — including the recent shooting in San Bernardino — and by that parallel measure, police are still about 130 times deadlier than terrorists.
10. Prescription Painkillers: The CDC estimates that 44 people die per day from overdosing on pharmaceutical painkillers. Never mind that that number is almost 14 times the number of Americans killed by Islamic terrorism each year. Based on the CDC’s figure, about 16,060 Americans die annually from painkillers — making the Big-Pharma money-makers 5,019 times more deadly than the Islamic terror that has Americans trembling whilst hiding under their blankies.
Other notable risks of death greater than an Islamic terror attack include scalding tap water, which kills 100 American per year; bad medical care, estimated to be responsible for at least 100,000 deaths in the U.S. annually; and hypothermia, which kills 1,340 Americans per year. Oh, and don’t forget Christmas trees. Fires caused by Christmas trees kill roughly ten people every year. Are Christmas trees conspiring with their lights to traitorously wage war on Christians via suicidal self-combustion?
While the Washington Post has previously cautioned against making comparisons between events that inherently cause death (for example, a terror attack) and events that may cause death (like driving a car or riding in an elevator), it remains that being caught in the throes of a terror attack is just as coincidental a fate as choking — or rather, less coincidental, based on the data. One could die from a terror attack at an office building, but they could also die from an elevator accident in the same location.
Either way, many of the most pervasive forms of death — like heart attacks, cancer, and painkiller overdoses — are preventable, at least in part, through lifestyle choices. If Americans were as passionate about ending these killers as they are about battling ostensible Islamic terror, millions of lives might be saved.
If Americans’ fear of death were rooted in data and objectivity, they might drop their calls to ban Muslims. The recent rash of attacks against peaceful Muslims might wane. Eighty-three percent of registered voters might not fear an inevitable terror attack. A majority of Americans might not call for further military escapades in the Middle East, which will most assuredly kill countless innocent civilians — all so the ‘free and the brave’ can do their Christmas shopping sans an irrational fear of being blown up at the mall (though previous invasions have done little to quell that panic).
Rather, Americans might consider changing many elements of their everyday lives. They might alter their diets to reduce heart attacks, tackle their addictions to pharmaceuticals, remove their televisions from their homes, and, er, avoid the dangerous bovine masses they have come to resemble so closely.
“I am not terrified of the terrorists; i.e., I am not, myself, terrorized. Rather, I am terrified of the terrorized; terrified of the bovine masses who are so easily manipulated by terrorists, governments, and the terror-amplifying media into allowing our country to slip toward totalitarianism and total war.” – Dan Sanchez
Out of those Jihadist mass shootings, eleven people were responsible over the course of 14 years. There are roughly 2.27 million Muslims in the United States. That’s 0.0048% of the selected population.
This cry for war in the Middle East is overblown. All war does is kill innocent people, and use up resources which could be used in causes or funding for things like schools, hospitals, and so on. In the end, the people who suffer are the ones who didn’t want to be involved in the first place.
~ The Arab One
Arab One!
It’s me, the hair anon again! First, I hope I didn’t come off horribly bitchy in my last submission. I really wasn’t even talking about your post. When I read it, I felt like a shell shocked soldier having a flashback or something. The original post you were responding to was dumb and embarrassing. AFAIK, Those blonde people would technically be part of a different anthropological racial category if they still existed in large enough numbers, so yeah just dumb. I just really needed to get all of that off my chest!!
I totally get where you’re coming from and absolutely agree that hair is dependent on ethnicity. Since race does not exist biologically, ethnicity is the only thing that actually affects your hair type, skin color, facial features, etc. My whole point with the race thing was more for people who try to be obtuse and act like Black people aren’t typically known as the group who has a very specific type of kinky curly hair (therefore naturally being marketed to for specific products) or large lips or certain builds. Like yeah, all races and ethnic groups are capable of these things, but race as a construct is only based on joining people by certain looks. So no, groups don’t “own” certain traits. It’s just annoying when people only acknowledge the presence of certain social structures and power systems when it’s convenient. The most common groups of White American ethnicities are German, Irish, English, Italian, Mexican, French, Polish, Scottish, Dutch, and Norwegian. So the types of White people you see here are different than they may be in other places, thus the power structures are typically, the key word here is typically, different.
Trust me, I’ve had some friends from India, the Middle East and even American Jewish girls with some seriously tough to manage hair! I’ve seen perms gone wrong on white girls and Asian girls alike. Being a curly girl is tough all around, like I said. My annoyance is solely with people who are not Black who get super upset that a Black movement is not for them, and therefore not receptive of them when they try to shoehorn themselves and their struggles into it. From what both of us have said, the struggles with hair seem to be at least a little bit intersectional. Beauty standards and race inform people’s self perception, and that is true all over the world. The hair struggle is real all over and unique for different groups in different parts of the world. I like to think of it as magenta vs. aubergine. Both lovely shades of purple, but made by mixing different dark shades of other colors. Similar, but not the same. Neither more important or better than the other. But still, if you work at Home Depot, you can’t sell someone who asked for one shade of paint a similar one and figure it’s good enough. If you’re any type of non-Black, you can’t be a part of the natural hair movement. Thems just the breaks.
Black people don’t own a type of hair or struggling with their hair. We do, however, own the Black American experience and the hair thang is a big part of it. If anyone is mad that the natural hair movement or natural hair products aren’t geared towards them because they are not Black will just have to stay pissed about it.
People on this website are really stupid and possessive about certain traits, as if they can be owned. They cannot. Your experience as a person of a certain ethnic group can be owned and if people explained stuff that way (or just weren’t stupid), their points would probably hold more water. But even if you do explain it that way, there will be someone watching and waiting to be obtuse about it. I guess my real frustration is with people who are so anti-SJW that a lot of their sentiments border on being anti-Black or just rhetorically ineffective.
Anyway, thanks for responding and adding to the discussion. Sorry for my long rambling frustration! And to close, how about something we can both laugh about? My best friend is from Italy and has silky and very loosely curled hair and she always talks about how “unmanageable” it is. But to straighten it, all she has to do it blow-dry it with a round brush. For a year now she’s been trying to convince me that she can do the same thing to my hair. I keep telling her that if she comes near me with that brush and blow dryer, she will draw back nubs. I think it’s hilarious that she genuinely doesn’t get that my hair just does not and will never ever work that way lmao!
You didn’t come off mean, don’t worry! I just like to make sure that there aren’t any misunderstandings ^^ Your points do make sense.
It’s definitely hard dealing with curly thick hair, especially if nobody knows how to help. They don’t sell those products here, so I have to deal with alternatives or buy them online. It’s also incredibly frustrating to have people tell me to just permanently straighten it, when I tell them clearly that I want to love my natural hair not pretend that it doesn’t exist.
As for the Black American hair movement, I do understand where you’re coming from. It’s mainly the Black Americans (In the U.S) that have to deal with it, but for me personally I think people that are non-black (but with the natural hair we’re talking about) joining the movement is alright if you are fighting for the same cause.
Yeah I get what you mean about the Anti-SJWs being too much. I see a few posts on my dash/twitter feed every once in a while, where they go way too overboard with their anti-SJWness. I usually tend to ignore them or respond if they seem reasonable enough for debate.
It’s no problem. I enjoy having those discussions, because where I am right now, debates/discussions are rare and usually result in fights.
Oh god, if that was possible to do with my hair, I would be so happy :P Can’t even get a brush/comb in my hair if it’s dry and blow-drying takes around 2-3 hours. That’s just funny!
~ The Arab One
A jury finds former Oklahoma City police officer Daniel Holtzclaw guilty of rape and forcible oral sodomy.
A jury found former Oklahoma City police officer Daniel Holtzclaw guilty Thursday of some of the most serious charges against him, including sexual battery, forcible oral sodomy and rape.
Holtzclaw faced 36 counts. He was found guilty on 18.
The former officer cried openly in the courtroom and rocked in his chair as the verdict was being read. Jurors deliberated for more than 40 hours over four days.
CLICK THE HEADER LINK TO READ THE FULL ARTICLE.
Something that's been bothering me...
There is something I see a lot of antis and others on tumblr say that bothers me. This quote from socialughjustice’s Arab One just bothered me and I really cannot get it out of my head, so I’ll leave my thoughts here.
“I’d also like to add - no race owns a specific trait. Blonde hair doesn’t only appear with white people, but the same logic applies to ‘natural’/curly thick hair. Black people don’t own that trait either"
Okay, so I’d like to start by saying that I’m a normal non-SJW person. I am also not trying to put words in Arab One’s mouth. His or her quote started off my train of thought, but I’ll be speaking to many different things that I’ve read and rolled my eyes at on tumblr.
Black people do not own thick, curly hair. However, my issue with this is twofold.
1. Black people do not own thick, curly hair. Some black people have thin, loosely curled hair. Some black people have thick, frizzy hair with no curl pattern at all. But I’d have a really hard time taking you seriously if you told me that you don’t associate certain hair types with Black people. I’d have an even harder time if you told me that a certain hair texture is not vastly more common to see on Black people. Yes, it happens that completely non-Black will have type 4 hair, it’s a very big world. But you absolutely have to admit that this is not extraordinarily common. Why do you think many white girls with super curly hair have a hard time with it? Because the shit is uncommon.
Many people with all types of curly hair can achieve an afro if they comb their hair out, but that is not the same as having 4a, 4b or 4c hair. Hair is not just about curly pattern, but also texture. It is possible to have the same types of curls as someone, but not the same texture. You may not realize that a lot of black women cannot straighten their (non-chemically altered) hair with one of those plug in flat irons, but rather need about two hours to hot comb and then flat iron it to get bone straight hair. That’s an example of how texture affects things.
2. The term “natural hair” is often taken out of context just so people can get butthurt over it, classic SJW bullshit that’s being utilized by antis. I’ve seen plenty posts that cry, “Everyone’s hair is natural hair! Not just black people! Why are these curly hair products made for black people? I have curly hair too! Blah blah fucking blah.” Duh everyone’s hair is natural. But if people bothered to use context or even try to read about anything they’d realize that the natural hair movement specifically refers to Black women, mixed Black women and other members of the African diaspora. Period. There is a deal of turmoil and pain associated with the hair for a lot of Black men and women.
If you have never been a Black person, you may not be familiar with the huge complexes that have been developed in large numbers of Black people about their hair. Many people aren’t aware that skin color and hair texture were used as ways to decide a slave’s and later on a free Black person’s place in servitude and society respectively. You may not know how many Black women with loosely curled hair feel fetishized by Black and non-Black men alike for having that one more “desirable feature” than other black women. You may not know that some mothers chemically alter their daughters’ hair as early as preschool, because that’s what’s been done for generations to make their hair “acceptable.” You may not know about the thousands of Black women who never even knew the texture of their natural hair before cutting off all of their chemically straightened hair and starting over. You probably never endured teasing from peers who jeered and called your hair “nappy” or said that “it looks like pubes.” You probably haven’t felt the frustration of seeing people with messy, uncombed straight bed head hair call their hair an afro, when it’s really just unkempt; showing their clear subconscious idea that an afro is somehow less than straight hair.
Having curly hair is tough, I would know. But the societal impacts are different for different groups of people and different textures, they just are. The experiences with certain aesthetics are different for different groups of people. I’m sure there are groups that tend to have more body hair, bigger features and other stuff who can speak to certain experiences.
My Indian friend told me about having a tough time with having very hairy arms, because that’s just pretty common in her ethnic group. Of course, many groups have very hairy arms! But in her experience, she was among other Indian girls being othered in her school community for it. That is what has happened in America with the hair of Black people and people have started responding by going back to their natural non-straightened, not chemically treated hair and refusing to perpetuate the shame surrounding it that is pervasive in the Black community. That is what the natural hair movement is about. This is what people are referring to when they say natural hair.
In a different context, natural hair may mean something else. But why would you insert yourself into a conversation that you don’t know the context of and then get upset? Please go ahead and use the natural hair products at your local Walgreens, regardless of your race. But why would you be mad that they are marketed to Black women? A lot of those companies are Black owned and they are catering to a very specific hair type and trying to provide people positive representation for their own people. You don’t get pissed when there’s an Asian food section of the grocery store, it’s the same thing.
But when you try to explain the complexities and history of this issue, people cry, “Why does everything have to be about race?!?!?"
THE DEFINITION OF RACE IS "RACE, AS A SOCIAL CONSTRUCT, IS A GROUP OF PEOPLE WHO SHARE SIMILAR AND DISTINCT PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS.”
DISTINCT PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS.
LIKE. THE. TEXTURE. OF. YOUR. HAIR.
So no, Black people do not own natural hair or thick, curly hair. As far as I have seen, no one has ever claimed that. But the experience of being a Black women with an afro is different than that of being a white woman with tight curls. There are plenty of pages and websites with info and tips for people with type 3 curly hair of all races! Those are probably more appropriate places to discuss your hair struggles if you’re non-Black, because your experience and feelings about your hair probably won’t mesh as well with natural hair movement pages and tags.
As a warning, this is going to be a long post.
I agree with you. However that post that you mentioned at the beginning was aimed at the people who make it about race - the same people who want to get around being called hypocritical by saying ‘Black people can have straight blonde hair so its okay for them to dye/straighten their hair, but no white person has had kinky hair, so they are appropriating when they curl their hair or get a perm!’.
For your second point - I think anyone who ignores the context when we use the term ‘natural hair’ is purposely making themselves seem ignorant. I am not a black person and I have never lived in the U.S, so I cannot say that I know/understand all the struggles going on over there.
I want to bring up a point. I don’t think ‘race’ is the only factor that contributes to the texture of your hair. Ethnicity is also a big point here. I am a ‘White Arab’, however my hair is a 3B type with the texture of what you are describing. I do understand the struggle.
As a child I’ve been straightening my hair for years. Back when I lived in NZ, I would be jeered at for my hair, because it was so unkept, dry, frizzy and curly. When I moved back to the Middle East, my mom decided that she couldn’t take it we began straightening my hair until someone suggested getting a chemical straightening. It worked for 3 months until my hair started breaking off. Every salon we went to told us that ‘this has never happened, the people that did the treatment weren’t using the original products’. I chemically straightened my hair three times each with varying results and a lot of hair breakage, but it would never come out completely straight. This made it worse because I wasn’t wearing a hijab back in high school, and I was known as the girl with the bird’s nest. In the end I gave up, went ahead and chopped off most of my hair to start over. I’m trying to go the natural method. So I do understand the frustration, because I’ve gone through that process myself. Someone who appears white can deal with those struggles.
I know you’re talking to the people who do get pissed about Natural products being advertised to the Black community, and I do think it’s something silly to get genuinely pissed at. But just because one characteristic of a race is more common in that race, doesn’t make it invisible in others either (It’s not always a black/white people thing).
Again this is pointed towards people who claim that Black people own a characteristic (which is pretty common on this website). I do agree with the rest of what you said though. Getting pissy because a product isn’t labelled towards ‘ALL RACES’ is stupid. Just use whatever you want and move on.
~ The Arab One
Being from a religious family and not wanting kids is just ugh. They wanna shove the same damn line about go forth and multiply down your throat. Not to mention all the selfish reasons to have one like "who will care for you in your old age?"
THAT WAS MEANT FOR ADAM AND EVE WHEN THEY WERE THE ONLY PEOPLE??? BACK IN A TIME WHEN BREEDING WAS ESSENTIAL TO THE SURVIVAL OF THE RACE-
I’m done. Tell your family to shove it up their ass, and tell them the context of that line. I’ve read Genesis!
- Kiwi one
I want to add here, that those ideas do depend on where you live and the cultural setting of said place.
I've lived in both the west, and the Middle East, and both their societies have different expectations of how a family should be.
Many people consider children a blessing, and decide to have large families. I personally know a girl who has 6 siblings and can't imagine herself having any less than 5 kids. If a couple has no children or just one, other people would ask why, or make comments about how their child must be terribly lonely without any siblings.
Another factor is that the concept of independence from the family is unfamiliar. You usually stay with your parents until you get married, and in well-off families - they usually pay for your tuition too, because its expected of you to help out family. This notion of helping out, also extends to helping your parents when they are well into old age.
But I do agree that everyone has their rig
hts in choosing how many kids they want. Those things should always get cleared up with their partners from the very beginning to clear up any misunderstandings and wants.
- The Arab One
Why is it that diversity is just about race and sexual orientation? I mean, the disabled community are the biggest minority yet we get the most harassment on a daily basis. Why does diversity not include us?
I completely agree.
The Old One
I dont know how people could see poverty as a culture, to where small houses are culture appropriation. Also, it's not just poor people with tiny houses? Even if my family wasn't poor, I'd still rather a tiny house. I could spend like what, $200k for a big house that has more than enough room, or like $400-600 a month for this tiny house that has all I need? It's not a "poor person" or poverty thing. Anyone who says it is, stop. Seriously, just don't start that.
Culture has lost all meaning.
The Old One
The only thing three years on tumblr has taught me is that no one on this site understands what culture actually is.
~ Gamer One
Anybody else remember this episode? In it, a female villain called Femme Fatale is stealing millions of dollars in Susan B. Anthony coins. Naturally, the Powerpuff Girls go to stop her. She then convinces them that men are all horrible because female superheroes aren’t as well known as male superheroes, even asking Blossom to name some to where her only answer is Wonder Woman.
They start acting bitter, refusing to do chores when the Professor asks and even telling the Mayor to save the town himself. Ms. Bellum and Ms. Keane talk to the girls and basically explain that being mean to guys won’t do anything and that isn’t the kind of message feminists should put out.
They proceed to beat up Femme Fatale while giving her a history lesson about Susan B. Anthony, the story where she voted and was found guilty because women couldn’t vote back then, but when the judge wanted to let her off easily because she was a woman, she forced them to take her to jail. The girls handle her and the lesson is that misandry will not stop misogny and we all should just respect each other.
And it fell on Tumblr’s deaf ears.
Reblogging again because this is great.
Lauren Faust also received a lot of unsurprising hate for this
This is very relevant those days. ~ The Arab One
Idk if you guys want to hear follower thoughts on new mods, but I feel like Mexican one reblogs things that are really classic anti social justice, rather than things that are critical of sjws. Like there are the 'not all of these people are bad, it's the racist sexist homophobic people ect' posts are ones I expect to see. But they reblog the 'tumblr: attacks straight people, :hates men :why does no one like us?" Posts and it just doesn't feel like it does to your blog
Well, they are learning still and they’re very new to this mod thing, so.
I’ll relay the message. Thank you for this!
- The Black One
Thank you for your input, and I will take it into consideration. If anyone wishes to critique me, feel free to because I want to make the content that the followers want and benefit the blog.
-Mexican One
Sometimes I don’t understand how people like this come to those conclusions.
Things your body does naturally cannot be stolen. I don’t think people understand what appropriation is anymore.
The Old One
I don't think they understand basic genetics either.
- The Arab One
Sometimes I don’t understand how people like this come to those conclusions.
Edit: I’d also like to add - no race owns a specific trait. Blonde hair doesn’t only appear with white people, but the same logic applies to ‘natural’/curly thick hair. Black people don’t own that trait either