There’s a lot of things happening in the Maundy Thursday liturgy — the washing of feet, the bread and the wine, and the abrupt end with the stripping of the altar.
But I want to focus on the one thing which happens every week in worship throughout the year — the bread and wine; one thing which finds its historical referent in the Maundy Thursday liturgy.
Jesus and his disciples went to a house, and Jesus washed their feet. Then they went to the upper room. And that’s where the story begins to take on a richly symbolic and timeless meaning. A few years later Paul, the apostle, will tell the Christian community in Corinth, “On the night when he was betrayed, the Lord Jesus took some bread and gave thanks to God for it. Then he broke it in pieces and said, ‘This is my body, which is given for you. Do this in remembrance of me.’ In the same way, he took the cup of wine after supper, saying, ‘This cup is the new covenant between God and his people—an agreement confirmed with my blood. Do this in remembrance of me as often as you drink it.’”
There is very little that we are required to do as Christians. Two of those things are found in tonight’s liturgy.
1) In John 13 Jesus gives a new commandment and says simply To love one another.
2) And in the Upper Room Jesus breaks bread and pours wine and says, “This is my body . . . Do this in remembrance of me.”
Do these things, Jesus says: Love one another so well that your love brings people together to eat bread and drink wine, my body and blood, so that you can remember my love for all of you.
From the very beginning early Christians celebrated this act of communion that we call The Eucharist very simply because Jesus told them to do it. And they celebrated this act of communion that we call The Eucharist because they believed Jesus when he said, “This is my body. This is my blood.” In the tradition of the Church there has been quite a lot of philosophizing about just how bread and wine become the body and blood of Christ. For example, Thomas Aquinas talks about them in terms of “accidents” and “substance.” The “accidents” being the physical attributes of the bread and wine. And the “substance” being the deeper reality of the bread and wine — that they become the body and blood of Christ. It’s from this language of “accident” and “substance” that we get the Roman Catholic teaching of “transubstantiation.” In the Anglican/Episcopal Church the teaching around The Eucharist has never quite reached the detail or consensus that it has in the Roman Church — Anglicans have historically been content with simply acknowledging the words of Jesus and believing them to be true — “This is my body; this is my blood,” We acknowledge both the meaning and the mystery of The Eucharist, that in it we encounter the real body of Christ, not a mere symbol, but the reality of Christ himself.
There’s a great story about the southern writer, Flannery O’Connor, who was taken to a party at the home of Mary McCarthy, ex-Catholic and ex-believer, a sophisticated and accomplished novelist, essayist and critic. What follows is O’Connor’s description of the encounter:
We went at [8 PM] and at [1 AM], I hadn’t opened my mouth once, there being nothing in such company for me to say.... Having me there was like having a dog present who had been trained to say a few words but overcome with inadequacy had forgotten them. Well, toward the morning the conversation turned on the Eucharist, which I, being the Catholic, was obviously supposed to defend. [Mary McCarthy] said when she was a child and received the Host, she thought of it as the Holy Ghost, He being the most “portable” person of the Trinity; now she thought of it as a symbol and implied that it was a pretty good one. I then said, in a very shaky voice, “Well, if it’s a symbol, to hell with it.” That was all the defense I was capable of.
From the beginning, Christians have celebrated and we continue to celebrate The Eucharist because Jesus told us to do it. And we celebrate The Eucharist because we believe that Christ is really present in the bread and wine — that it’s more than a symbol — it’s a reality of God’s presence with us. And if it’s not, then like Flannery O’Connor I say, “To hell with it.”
Do you know why Flannery O’Connor said that? Do you know I say that?
Because symbols are great and they are meaningful, but symbols alone cannot save us.
It’s like me telling you that I’m hungry and you giving me a plastic piece of bread and saying, “I know you’re hungry, take this symbol of food and feast.” No! I’m not symbolically hungry, I’m literally hungry! The same is true of The Eucharist. We do not need to be saved symbolically, we need to be saved literally! We need nothing less than the body and blood of Christ to transform us and to save us from ourselves and from our sins and from the reality of evil which seeks everyday to destroy us.
Over the course of it’s history, the Church has often complicated the message of Jesus and, like Pharisees, has made faith more cumbersome than it actually needs to be. Tonight we’re reminded that Jesus gives us very little to do but what he gives us is non-negotiable — 1) Love one another and 2) Remember him in The Eucharist. And neither one of those are meant to be done symbolically. We gather here tonight because we have come to learn that mere symbols, though beautiful they may be, cannot save us in themselves. Because for our bodies to be saved, we’re going to need a real body to save us.











