Why is kindness even a thing?
From a purely evolutionary perspective, every organism’s main goal is to reproduce and have offspring. Darwin’s theory of natural selection mandates that those organisms with certain phenotypic traits better suited to a specific environment will have the highest probability of survival. In other words, every organism has evolved to prioritize their and their offsprings’ survival over others’. Such individualistic mindsets should only breed greed and self-motivated behaviors so how do explain the relatively high frequency of acts of kindness and selflessness?
Perhaps we misunderstood Darwin’s teachings. While Darwin did tout the notion of survival of the fittest, Darwin also emphasized the importance of community in: “for those communities, with the greatest number of sympathetic members, would flourish best, and rear the greatest number of offspring.” Community has also evolved social structure such as cooperative caregiving to supervise vulnerable offspring. On a biological level, even our physiological systems have evolved harmoniously to maximize metabolic and cellular efficiency.
Individually, then, it would have been advantageous to evolve physiological systems that favor or promote community. Recent research has brought to light the existence of mirror neurons, neurons that allow an individual to experience to a certain degree what another individual experiences. In layman terms, mirror neurons foster empathy. Studies have also demonstrated that a primitive brain region, the periaqueductal gray, is activated when an individual experiences or practices compassion. Another region involved in compassion is the vagus nerve system. Among lower class and middle class individuals, it is stimulated during acts of compassion but is inhibited in upper class individuals. This phenomenon makes sense from an economic and evolutionary perspective as individuals with large resource reservoirs are able to self-sustain themselves and are less inclined to share their resources with a community. Along the same lines, psychology studies have also observed that poorer individuals are more likely to donate than richer individuals. Many popular theories have arose to try to explain this behavior including one that proposes that humans are naturally altruistic. While pessimistic, I like to think that poorer individuals only donate more frequently because they subconsciously believe their meager donations could potentially lead to higher investment returns from the community. Moreover, I like to believe that donors receive a sense of satisfaction from donating to further maximize self-gratification and desires. I guess one could then argue that acts of kindness and charity outweigh the sins of self-gratification.
Wow, I am definitely a glass half-empty kind of person. Fuck.











