#patenttrolls

[ipconsultinggroup-1]

In 2025, patent trolls are making a strong comeback, targeting startups, universities, and tech innovators with aggressive lawsuits.

These entities don’t invent or create. They acquire broad or vague patents with one goal: to sue companies that are actually building something valuable.

🚨 Why You Should Pay Attention:

📈 Patent trolls are increasingly focusing on AI, software, and SaaS technologies.

🌍 Cross-border enforcement gaps make it easier for them to operate undetected.

📉 Startups with weak or unregistered IP are the easiest targets.

🛡️ How to Defend Your IP Like a Pro:

✅ Conduct regular IP audits to identify gaps

✅ File strong, defensible patents that can withstand litigation

✅ Monitor global filings to spot and challenge troll activity

✅ Secure your IP rights in all jurisdictions you operate in

✅ Work with an experienced legal team before you become a target

At IP Consulting Group, we help innovators, startups, and enterprises stay protected with proactive IP strategy and litigation defense.

📞 Contact Us:

📧 [email protected] 🌐 www.ipconsultinggroups.com 📍 Location: United States – Serving Globally

📞 DC: [phone] | MD: [phone] | FL: [phone]

[klemchukllp]

Kaspersky Lab turns the tables, forces “patent troll” to pay cash to end case

Technology company claims victory in Eastern District of Texas against alleged patent troll

#patents #edtx #patentTrolls

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/08/kaspersky-lab-turns-the-tables-forces-patent-troll-to-pay-cash-to-end-case/

[stevensaid-blog]

Patent Trolls

A close friend of mine once told me that patents were one of the easiest ways of generating passive money. At that time, I thought it was clever and harmless. A bit of research, however, unfolds all of the controversy surrounding the harmless idea. Here’s how most patent trolls operate these days: obtain a patent, keep it vague as hell so that you can claim ownership to future inventions that you have realistically never even dreamt of, and bully the defendant into settling for $50,000 instead of paying millions in a patent case. Here are some interesting facts I learned from watching John Oliver dissect the slimy business of patent signing:

- Patent trolls are hindering R&D and innovation by threatening to sue potential inventors that are often too skittish/broke to do anything about it; since 1990, investors have lost half a trillion dollars. 

- Most ridiculous example: Fulner LLC sues a company that helps disabled workers find employments by claiming patent right to using scanned email function on the company’s photocopiers. 

- 25% of ALL patent cases occur in Marshall, Texas as trolls understand the judges there are very lenient towards plaintiffs; Samsung built an ice skating rink in front of the court to lobby judges from agreeing with the plaintiffs

- While a bill that would reform the patent process won unanimously in the House, it never reached the Senate due to influence by lobbyists, including trial lawyers (corruption, much?). 

[lsag-aba-ipl]

#CLE Recap: Are the Trolls Really Out of Control? Reflections on Recent Efforts to Limit “Abusive Patent Litigation”

By Stacy Yae (@stacypyae)

Are “trolls” creating real problems with widespread demand letters to small businesses? With NPE patent assertions? With all patent assertions generally?

These were a few questions that opened up the highly anticipated panel presentation on Friday, April 4. Brian Carroll, General Counsel at LevelUP (SCVNGR, Inc.), a Boston-based company revolutionizing mobile payments, moderated the event. Program speakers included high-profile individuals: Attorney General William Sorrell, Vermont, Suzanne Michel, Senior IP Counsel at Google, Phyllis Turner-Brim, Chief IP Counsel at Intellectual Ventures, Rich Rainey, IP Counsel at GE, and Dean Watson, IP Counsel at Dura Automotive

Discussion extended beyond these opening questions, delving into the more complex issue of how the present patent enforcement system enables and encourages “patent trolling.”

One particular key factor that encourages “patent trolling” is the proliferation of patents with vague, obvious, and overbroad claims. Rich Rainey spoke to this issue, saying that our patent enforcement system needs to adopt stricter specificity requirements to prevent clutter in the federal dockets.

What’s your take on the “patent trolling” phenomenon? Join the conversation on Twitter with the hashtag #IPLSpring. Whether the post-grant provisions of the AIA will contribute to reducing poor-quality patent litigation will remain to be seen.

If you didn't attend the 29th Annual Intellectual Property Law Conference, you can catch up on all that you missed by reviewing the tweets and blog entries of the ABA-IPL’s Law Student Reporters, who covered all the Conference events on Twitter. You do not have to sign up for Twitter to follow the Law Student reporters. Just visit this link.

[semanticdrift]

Rise of the Patent Troll: An Everything is a Remix Special Presentation

[iplawleaders]

#Korea’s #FTC toughens rules against #PatentTrolls tinyurl.com/l2cpy96 #NPE http://click-to-read-mo.re/p/5lMb

[iplawleaders]

#InnovationAct and Stopping #PatentTrolls http://youtu.be/uSEH7nYTRh4 #patent #reform #NPE http://click-to-read-mo.re/p/57wm

[appdevelopersalliance]

App Developers Alliance and Electronic Frontier Foundation Join to Stop Patent Troll   Court Should Consider Pending Covered Business Method Review Before Allowing Patent Troll to Wage