Untitled

[stubbornkoalacat]

Radical feminist is a fascist term. It is conservative, separatist feminism. The "exceptionally inclusive and boundary breakingly progressive feminism" you'd be safest in is intersectional feminism. It is all inclusive feminism regardless of race or splitting hairs about gender.

ISFF and her friends do not want this because they are ideological grifters who want isolated young women and not free thinking individuals.

Trans radical feminism shares more tactics with terfs and pays more lip service to fascism than intersectional feminism that deconstructs the historical, racial, class hierarchy and hypocritical codes of conduct that enable such white supremacist, cultist group thinking.

To trans girls in her circle, there is still time to run and get safe. There is always still time as a minor and there is grace lended to the young and irrelevant.

That woman is a bag of cats regardless of age. Her hubris will only expose you to more harm than due.

[stubbornkoalacat]

Why would someone who loves all trans women block me over this? Remember that if you disagree with her, she will do this to you someday.

Black trans girls are especially unsafe in such a circle.

[stubbornkoalacat]

As a black trans woman, I will simply never choose to share a community with someone who will misgender, degender or gaslight me over a disagreement on anything but least of all political jargon with little theory, practical application offline or historical infrastructure behind it.

Irregardless of anything, stop expecting brown trans women and girls to share community unreflecting racists. It's never going to happen globally.

To brown trans girls seeing this, they will turn on and invalidate you the moment you step out of line. Don't believe me? Ask them to publicly apologize for misgendering those they have already. Build your own movement, however difficult.

[stubbornkoalacat]

Stop me if you've heard this before:

A restorative justice web activist who has shared no accounts of working in food kitchens, partnering with queer aid organizations or simply reading the words of Black activists and writers with several run ins with state law and military when acting on their anticarceral principles but speaks as an authority on restorative justice as if she has.

She's been in no kink spaces, has held no activist titles. A title does not equate doxxing oneself. Achievements are anonymous enough when spoken on discreetly.

No kink bar tales. None? Sounds like she's pretty young. I am not talking about sexual encounters. I am speaking on evidence of community outreach.

Mentorship stories? No.

Overcoming great communication pitfalls? No.

Language barrier concerns with someone entirely outside the English speaking worldview? No. Understanding that the less western and more rural someone is, the harder it will be for them to change their minds toward her politics? No. Achievements in Europe? Significance of trans kinship in France, in England? No. Trans women are especially vulnerable, there.

I believe the obsession with Yankees is a Freudian slip of how many spoken to. It's easier to keep an unknowledgable audience down when they still feel self hate. You can liberate women on your words alone. But only so much, they mustn't break rank. They must be kept in line.

How would such a woman speak on brown activists who have built aid organizations, who have written theory that disagrees with hers? Has she even read other perspectives?

Does she treat them with decency or their opinions as fair game? Hmmm. Surely her friends haven't tarnished a net of unity and mutual aid on this platform right in front of you over this?

We all are that net, communities, sharing aid and resources and articles together. Is it harder for all of us lately?

If you've read this far, simply consider volunteering for something more than your own comfort. Act on the needs of others in your community greater than your own. That is communism.

Simply do not trust white peace activists with nothing unique to say about MLK. Or Marsha P. Or Ida B Wells. Or Rosa Parks. Or Assatta Shakur. Huey P Newton. Fred Hampton?

It might be that they do not know what they speak of. And it might even be that large figures have others write their posts for them.

White power must simply wane in every community for any of our brothers, sisters, and queer folk to be remotely free.

Happy MLK Day

[stubbornkoalacat]

You should not trust the words of trans activists who cannot stop misgendering people they disagree with. If misgendering is okay for them and not for you, that is not a trustworthy person to guardian all queer truth.

Moreover, a white European who cannot hear that they have intrinsic privilege that will not be rescinded over all brown people, even in the west, is simply not to be trusted in racial or international discourse.

Moreover, moreover, it's simply foolish to feel that someone whose own abuse takeaway is their personal gospel but cannot stand when this is true for others, nor can point you to renowned theory books, speakers and organizations who act on that takeaway that are credible in the world outside her window, is so trustworthy with anticarceral language.

Quote theory to them, your audience. Find them sources and shelters to stay safe. Equip them with these staunch youth liberation tools. Cooking skills, financial literacy, self defense are a better start than sexual encounter. It will come in time. They don't need to feel dirty, but the dolls need to survive outing, survive homelessness and survive poverty.

"We'll write and build the first ones." Then do it. The internet is simply not brick and mortar. A post is not a published paper.

Finally, the term "Third World" is an english term that literally means 'country of brown peoples that is less than.' If you are going to have this discussion, it should be had with people knowledgeable enough to have it. Not teenagers.

[missstrogen]

[stubbornkoalacat]

Cute post. Is this true for the black transfems you degender and villainize?

[stubbornkoalacat]

To put things very simply, why subtly and overtly misgender and degender every transfem who disagrees with you? Why stoop that low?

It's not terf shit to call someone a class traitor, it's a right of free speech to feel so.

But to call everyone who disagrees with you not a trans woman or secretly a man. Or even tme when you've been explicitly told that that is untrue is not just transmisogynist.

The racial intersections with the abusive rhetoric of degendering cannot go underswept.

To strip someone of what is within is conversion thinking. To claim you know better than they do is transphobic.

To call black women who disagree with you cis, men or tme is just plain transphobic, racist and wrong when you are very very knowledgeable that this isn't the case.

I expect better. Put very simply.

Thought crimes are either actions as posts on the internet or they are not real. With no in between.