The platonic idea of friendship lives at the edge of darkness
No film maker could produce a darker scene, than what we witnessed today in Austria, close to Slovak borders. Fifty dead bodies of refugees crammed into a locked abandoned truck that previously belonged to a Slovak poultry producer. Policemen in the white suits collecting forensic evidence that could help catch the driver who in on the run. No series as dark as True Detective could produce the following pun â few months ago the same company run an advert that prayed on the current widespread fears of refugees and where their chicken were contrasted to âillegal immigrantâ imported chicken.
After reading this story and seeing some disgusting comments spreading over Facebook, I thought immediately of the Giorgio Agambenâs notion of âhomo sacerâ. Prisoners in concentration camps or inhabitants of slums are homo sacer and represent a human being in its universality. A person, who has only his bare life and is in a state of âex-ceptionâ, both outside and inside of the law. San Francis became such person, when he abandoned the worldly glory and all his possessions. Anyone can become homo sacer due to unfortunate events such as war or natural disasters.
What makes us human is the ability to feel compassion to people in these dare circumstances. It is a privilege to feel human these days, not a precondition. People wrongly assume that being barbaric is something alien. What is a human? Can you locate her kernel in brain, in synapses, in the abstract notion of soul? It is only the thin skin that separates us from the flesh. Humanity is just a delicate veil.
Another thought that immediately appeared was the memory of platonic idea of friendship that arises from the darkest of all places. Slavoj ĆœiĆŸek in the interview with Michael Hauser titled Humanism is not enough explains what he means by a platonic idea of friendship. I will quote it in full because I worry I couldnât reproduce it better:
âRecently I read Jorge SemprĂșn, the Spanish writer. He was in the concentration camp Buchenwald. He wrote in his memoirs a wonderful story. It is very pathetic, it will sound like poetry but for me itâs ontology. He says, once he was in a camp and he saw a train with 180 Jews and since it was winter they were all frozen. Only in the middle when prisoners were dying, they were in the train for two days, they put children in the middle. So they were all frozen horribly, in the middle 18 children survived. The German guards took them out and shot them, only two children there remained. One boy a little bit older, six years, another four years. And then they let the dogs run after the boys to amuse themselves. And what happened is that two boys, one six, the other four, started to run away with the dogs behind them. The smaller boy fell down. Heroically, the big boy returned and grabbed his hand. And at that point they were attacked by the dogs and killed.
But SemprĂșn says very nicely âTheir hands were joined for eternity.â That was for me the moment where this totally absurd gesture, you know you die. This is honor worth dying for. It has no substance but this is the moment of ethical eternity for me, clasped hands, as SemprĂșn says very precisely. I even imagine how this scene should be filmed, the image should be frozen, on the soundtrack you hear the children are dying, the dogs are tearing them apart, but the image is the platonic idea. It stands there.â
So today when I see examples of horrible comments on the tragic fate of those 50 refugees and the utmost surreal context of the poultry corporation, I think of those barbaric trolls on Facebook as those concentration camp guards from SemprĂșnâs story, who now metaphorically send virtual dogs to kill the spirits of already dead children. But they shouldnât kill our spirits too. Because the idea of human friendship is eternal and universal. And it appears when the Reality cracks and the beauty of the Universal beams through the heroic acts of people, who are not afraid to put their skin into the game. The game is called being human. It is a privilege, not a requirement.