Pop Cosmopolitanism
“Locals care little about diversity per se but want to hold onto their own traditions. The cosmopolitans recognize that they will not get the diversity they crave “unless other people are allowed to carve out special niches for their cultures and keep them”” (Jenkins 2006).
This reminding me Dick Hebdige’s article “Subculture, The Meaning of Style”. “So the tensions between dominant and subordinate groups can be found reflected in the surfaces of subculture - in the styles made up of mundane objects which have a double meaning” (Hebdige). People are able to take inspiration from groups they follow and create their own thing which can be categorized as a subculture.
“Objects borrowed from the most sordid of contexts found a place in the punks' ensembles: lavatory chains were draped in graceful arcs across chests encased in plastic bin-liners. Safety pins were taken out of their domestic "utility" context and worn as gruesome ornaments through the cheek, ear or lip.” Hebidge goes on to speak about the idea of objects borrowed which goes back to the idea of pop cosmopolitanism.






