It's not about transitioning into privilege. It's about the privilege transmascs and all other tme have from birth over tfems due to transmisogyny. We aren't saying you are transitioning into privilege. We are saying that due to structural transmisogyny within trans spaces trans mascs have the ability to wield that structural power, consciously or unconsciously, against transfems.
How though? Also, from BIRTH? Cuz if we are placing such importance on AGABs (which is stupid btw), it would actually be the opposite, no? ( <-none of those are rhetorical questions )
Transmisogyny exists but trans women are not the only hoes up in this bitch with their own unique sets of issues and you can't just imply that. Every argument you may have over trans men being able to hold some sort of 'privelege' over trans women may have situational merit, but you can say the fucking opposite as well. So why? Why the oppression olympics? Why try and create this huge big divide/movement to insist that trans women face the most oppression ever and thats the end of it?
We could very well just be talking about different things here and I do want to acknowledge that, but trans people have no systematic power over anyone. Being trans is being a minority and theres no part of the minority group that inherently has any more power over others. To insist so you would either have to erase a shit ton of factors/experiences, or have blatant sampling bias.