Hi there, I'm new to your blog and have to say I love it! Re: Dany and the Dragons, I do wonder if that is a specific drawing point to get more male viewers more interested in the show. I do know that I had to mention dragons, zombies, and sex (yep...) to get my boyfriend interested; he came for those things, stayed for the storyline. So, who would you like to see featured predominantly in advertising if it wasn't Dany? Lbr, without her dragons (and Drogo), I find her kinda boring :/
That would be the ugly truth, wouldn’t be? Idk. I know a lot of male fans of the show, that watch it for many reasons but Dany and her dragons, and boobs. Though the boobs don’t hurt. But mostly they happen to be book readers. But again, many male viewers (only viewers) are interested in the male characters, Robb, Tyrion, Jon, and Jaime, and don’t care much for the fantasy aspect of the show. Idk, not gonna make generalizations, but it’s true that the show does have a tendency to feature what they think is the selling point of the story. And mainly because they have this assumption that women don’t watch the show. In fact, in earlier seasons, they seemed clearly surprised that the show attracted more female viewers, than male. And as soon as they made that realization, they tried to fight it, and made it all about attracting male viewers. Somehow a show with a larger female viewership, is something that they thought it might hurt the show in the long run (it’s not the first time I’ve seen producers do this though).
I don’t have a problem with the show featuring Daenerys and Tyrion, I have a problem with the show featuring only and mostly them. I don’t need one character to be predominantly featured as the face of the show. The show has a lot of characters, and a lot of good actors, that can be the one of the many faces that could be featured. Early into this show, a couple of reviewers commented on the “annoying" fact that this show didn’t have lead characters, and stupidly enough, the producers went to “fix" what was not broken. The reviewers were speaking from the perspective of people who have no interest in the genre, or even in the show for the long run. And the first complaint was the number of actors and characters, and that Daenerys wasn’t enough in the show. A season later, the producers changed both things, “fixing" everything this one reviewer didn’t like about the show. I doubt the reviewer now sees the show differently, in fact, I doubt he even watches it, cause he didn’t seem interested in the show, nor the genre, and wrote a review with the passion of a turtle, and criticized things that were not a problem or an actual issue of the production, but were only his personal likes or dislikes about the genre, and the show in general. So, in my opinion, the producers are doing what they think attracts the masses, and the good reviews. Ironically, neither of the changes done, have improved the show, from a critical to a fan’s standpoint. The show is now more or less, a good cgi’d show, with some good shock value moments, embellished by some unnecessary nudity. And if some critics and or fans like that, is because they don’t know how good it could have been, if the producers hadn’t bastardized the purpose, the look, and the storyline so much. It’s ok to like it (or love it), but to call it “great, amazing, or groundbreaking" is trying to reach for the stars with a stationary bicycle.