CAUGHT 📸
seen from United States

seen from France
seen from China
seen from T1

seen from Mexico

seen from Malaysia
seen from Tunisia

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Colombia
seen from United States

seen from Canada

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Spain
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
CAUGHT 📸
i thought they would look more different than this but these guys truly are just mtt shifted to the right i guess
Cliffjumper don't do it, don't spill the beans to EC, everyone will know about what happened between you and Sentinel-
Just a silly scene after this happened
collin who turned you into a sticky figure dude we gotta get you outta there
so ive been trying to articulate (in a way that doesn't feel super arbitrary) why generative ai feels like "not art" to me in a way other kinds of visual art that have been criticized as "not art" before don't (namely photography, collages, and readymades). to clarify i hate gen ai for its environmental and weasely anti-artist bullshit first and foremost. i don't need ai art to be "not art" to hate it, and neither should you. but i am interested in explaining why it bothers me so much from that more vibes-based angle, because i don't think it's complete nonsense, even if it's not 100% airtight to me. And because i think a lot of the people saying "gen ai art isn't art" casually don't know that much about art/art history and/or haven't thought much about what their personal definition of art is, and just say that because it feels correct. for me, i think the best ive come up with is this:
let's say you have a patron and an artist. the patron gives instructions on what they want, and when they snap their fingers, the artist makes it following their instructions—making their own interpretations and decisions on everything that wasn't specified based on their skill, experience, thought process, and personal inclinations. maybe the patron picks the subject, the style, the colors, general composition, whatever. maybe the patron says they want a person with rosy cheeks sitting under a tree. it's still the artist who has to decide what EXACT shade someone's rosy cheeks are and how to blend it with the rest of the skin and how to convey that while still adhering to their lighting and texture and level of detail requirements, what EXACT angle each leaf should be facing, etc etc.
in that scenario, you wouldn't really call the patron an artist. the artist is an artist and the art is art, because someone did make it on purpose, but the patron didn't really make it so much as cause it to be made. they prompted it to the same extent a boss prompts work; the boss didn't do the work. you wouldn't call a film director a cameraman or an actor, no matter how much they influenced the acting and camerawork in the movie. between the patron, the boss, and the director, there is a middle actor who actually executes the task. with gen ai there is a patron giving instructions and snapping their fingers, and rosy cheeks and maple trees appear. the work is prompted and then happens, but it's not quite made. because there's a distinct middle actor between the ai "artist" and the image, and that middle actor is unthinking. and a lot of what we use to determine what's art comes down to choices during production made with conscious intent.
photography is art even though it's captured instantly from real life (with the click of a button, even) because the photographer still had to make a lot of choices re: lighting, timing, camera settings, location, etc, in a way that's very hands-on and requires a certain amount of artistic knowledge and skill. they clicked a button, but nothing assembled the scene for them. they had to find the Right tree and the Right person at the Right time of day and season and then they CHOOSE to capture the Exact Right Second of that scene and that's the photo. collages are art even though they use other people's art (i.e. photographs cut from magazines) because there is intent in how the components are selected and arranged and skill in how they are cut. every component is directly, consciously, and individually assessed, chosen, and assembled by the artist. readymades are art even though they're just an object someone declared an art piece because someone took a part of the world around them and changed its context. the artistic act is the selection, removal, and declaration as art. and, of course, someone made the object to begin with. (you could compare this to the film director. you wouldn't call the director a cameraman, but they are still an artist; the readymade artist is not a urinal craftsman, but they are an artist. if that makes sense). there are always conscious decisions being made by the artist.
now this argument is far from perfect. you could argue ai art steals other artists' work as much as collages do, just down to the pixel-by-pixel level. you could argue the prompt revision process in ai is a process of conscious assessment and selection by someone, and therefore as involved as a readymade or photography piece would be. you could argue that every component of every photograph, collage, or readymade AREN'T chosen, and that im holding ai art to a higher standard than these. you could argue that my distinction between "making" something and "causing something to happen" is super vague and ultimately bullshit bc of how much it relies on connotation. i don't think that what ive laid out here is irrefutable proof that ai art isn't art, and i don't know that i need it to be. it's just the best way i can think to express why it doesn't feel right to me and so many others.
the thing is, i don't want to dismiss something as "not art" just because it doesn't FEEL like art to me, and i worry that a lot of the arguments for why it doesn't count as art are a little bit regressive and reactionary. there are many types of art that are now generally considered art that were once dismissed like that, and as someone who considers pretty much everything that someone claims to be art as art, i don't love that a side i agree with seems to be arguing from such a knee jerk "just cuz" kinda place. my definition relying on conscious individual consideration might be arbitrary and reactionary in and of itself. maybe my position will change in time. it's hard to say.
TO BE 100% CLEAR: FUCK AI ART. I DO NOT RESPECT IT BECAUSE IT IS UNETHICAL. my point here is that anti-ai art arguments probably shouldn't rely on accusations of "soullessness" just because their method of engagement is different (and because any definitions reliant on things like effort, process, time, skill, use of machinery, etc kind of draw arbitrary lines imo; plus there's an urge to dismiss things you disagree with as "not real art", and i think that's dangerous and reactionary and we should be careful of it)—but also that i totally get why people say they're soulless, because a prompter is so distant from the art that it doesn't feel accurate to call them artists at all.
so maybe ai art is art, but ai "artists" aren't really artists. y'know?
those beatneku designs i was talking about,,,
⧽ "𝕳𝖔𝖑𝖑𝖔𝖜." | folk horror, original story.
𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚕𝚘𝚐𝚞𝚎
 ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄
Some myths are born of mist. Some just reside beneath the packed earth. A language that only your bones can understand — not always articulable. At least, not in ways one could train their tongue to do.
It is not a language meant for mouths.
There are other ways: ink, incantations, parchment to soil and floors to bleed upon. Poisoned altars cracked and grown over with moss, statues with eyes that once moved.
Some were never meant to be found; some are still warm.
The languages in which one could describe it are dead, buried under tendrils of roots and soil interspersed with ash. Only those brave enough to unearth such monstrosities might dare to hope. And hope? A fatal aspiration.
For it is an archaic evil.
Older than names. Older than warnings. Older than prayer.
A noose that slips around young soft necks made of flesh, fastened with not-quite-hands.
It does not rush. It has never needed to.
It seeks the innocent. The curious. Preys upon it. Catches the scent of openness like a starving beast to a blood trail—hell, it doesn’t even have to be hungry right then and there. There was hardly ever a time where it denied what it craves most. It is teeming and it is a burden ravenously carried. Cradled in its bottomless core–if there even is one. It is an unbleedable that forever feeds. Rips bones from flesh, claws through muscle with tendon, extorts soul and spirit.
Nevertheless, it will take. Undyingly, eternally greedy, it will hunt. It will wait. It has always waited.
Time does not starve it.
For a nameless entity is never truly satiated. The cycle? The cycle persists. Because people still love, live, and raise children anyway.
.
.
.
MENA wakes to her soft even breaths cradled against his ribs and his hand stroking along his knuckles.
He doesn’t open his eyes. Not immediately. He never does – not unless Zenni’s absence is apparent or Carmelo's making too much noise when preparing to go out to tend the woodwork. Mena will toss a glare his way then, wordlessly berating his husband on him and his trying big feet, and every time he will receive an apologetic giggle–hushed, of course–and an apology kiss to his hairline. He knows Carmelo is in no way apologetic every time.
But what steals his heart and settles it in tandem is the tiny being curled against his side.
He’s used to waking before her. She’s a heavy sleeper most of the time, but every now and again, his little girl is up with the dawn. Sometimes even before Carmelo, who wakes before dawn. On those days, she rolls around between them and hums until she either gets too hungry or frankly bored and hums right up against Mena's ear until he stirs. If Carmelo is still in bed, Mena can count on that saving grace. For on those days, he’s roused to wake by the sound of playful shushes and toddler gurgles of delight, usually followed by obnoxious twin kisses against his face and ears and hair until his laughter is inevitable.
Today, it’s far past dawn.
The air is clear but the sky is not. The window is cracked just so, and Mena's sharp nose catches the storm approaching before he finally forces his eyes to open halfway.
And Zenni is wide awake.
Her tiny hands curled into the neckline of his sleep-rumpled shirt, her little feet tucked beneath his thigh, gazing up at the corner of the ceiling and whispering wordlessly.
At something he cannot see.
Mena does not sit up.
He has learned what sitting up costs.
The whispering does not scrape at him the way it once would have. It settles instead, heavy and familiar, like weather in old bones. Instead, he keeps his breathing even, keeps his hand where it is, keeps Zenni close enough to feel the rise and fall of her tiny chest.
What tightens his throat is not the thing he cannot see.
It is the way she listens.
There’s movement out of the corner of his sleep-clouded vision. Mena turns, just barely, and meets Carmelo's gaze over Zenni’s mop of ebony curls.
He looks as exhausted, as wary, as bone-tired as Mena feels.
They share a look. A breath.
Then Zenni giggles. Untethered and sweet as a bell. She sits up, abrupt as children do, curls sleep-matted and bouncing, and flops on her belly across them both—her button nose against Mena's sternum, her legs splayed over Carmelo's midsection. Familiar. Warm. She chirps at the awareness both her worlds are awake now, honey-golden eyes flitting between them like they hung the stars she slept beneath.
The house exhales.
So do the men.
It’s going to be one of those days.
Something in Mena's chest loosens. He doesn’t realize he was holding his breath until he releases it precisely when Carmelo does. A single organism, the both of them, forged from years of habit.
Carmelo sits up slowly and braces against the headboard, already cooing as he scoops Zenni up to cradle against his neck. Mena follows suit. The age-old animal in his chest settles into something warm, curls up around the core that bloomed the day he first held Zenni in his arms—impossibly tiny, pink, pure as a baby's breath bloom, too good to be born upon this wretched world.
She flops until her head thumps against Mena's thigh beneath the blanket, trying to escape Carmelo's smothered tickly kisses, and Mena's hand immediately finds her crown.
He pretends it isn’t trembling.
Instead, he mirrors her little hums as he gazes down at her.
She responds with a musical trill, strikingly similar to the lady hummingbird nested in their oak tree.
Yes. It’s going to be one of those days.
im not good at making looping gifs