archadespirate replied to your post: archadespirate replied to your post: ...
it was more the boldness of the tags you made in that post :0c i was kindaā¦ idk, shocked that someone could be soā¦ /cruel/ i guess it the term, about someone elseās artā¦ good or bad
āKay Iām going to put this under a cut = v =āa
Ā Ā Ā I tend to be quite frank about my opinions, especially in my own tags. I donāt mince my words, and my filter on this site only goes so far.
Ā Ā Ā I donāt think the picture is very good. If you think thatās cruel ( I presume because I called it shitty? ), I canāt help that. The person who drew it seems to have a lot of better art on their blog... And I can guarantee thereās a lot more deserving art thatās been uploaded this week which deserves to be spotlit like that. Amazing lovely art that isnāt getting shown to the dwindling crowd on here... Because of what I can only guess is bias from the oddities that run this site. Thereās been similar art of similar quality thatās been shown that gets highlighted because.... ...Of certain reasons that I donāt think give the art itselfĀ further merit.
Ā Ā Ā ...Iām not going to get into that here because thatās not the point of this-- I digress.
Ā Ā Ā You can disagree, obvs a lot of people do disagree since it has a lot of likes and got spotlit in the first place. And I donāt think less of anyone for liking it or whatever. I can see what people would like about it. I just donāt and it annoys me and Im allowed to get annoyed and vocalise it, just as you are to sayĀ āhey vervain, thats not very nice, why do you say that?ā
Ā Ā Ā But like.. It pays to be upfront with what you want to say in the first place without being vague. It can make you come off as passive aggressive. I donāt mind talking stuff out if I offend, but I canāt do that if you just goĀ āwowā and call meĀ āmy dudeā until I prompt you for it. If I hadnāt, I wouldnāt have known. So please donāt do that.
