seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United Kingdom
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
Trump hangs on by a thread
Donald J. Trump keeps bragging about how great he is as a man and as a politician, about he won two of three presidential elections in a landslide. Hmm. I gave that some thought, so I looked up a few numbers to try to put this man’s time in high office in its proper perspective. Let’s take a brief look at them, OK? Trump ran in 2016 against Hillary Clinton. He finished that election with nearly…
United States of America - Where Are We?
View On WordPress
Federal officials admitted in a recent lawsuit that Donald Trump has denied funding to Democratic-led states.
John Solomon, a member of Trump’s election task force, confessed that there is no proof of election fraud in the last three elections.
The Not-So-Great Debate Debacle: Trump vs. Biden
The first Trump-Biden debate became one of the most talked-about political moments of the 2024 election cycle. Instead of a clean policy clash, the night turned into a test of stamina, discipline, and public perception - and for many observers, it raised more questions than it answered.
A Debate That Missed the Mark
The debate was widely described as messy, tense, and unusually chaotic, with both candidates struggling to make their strongest case under pressure. Trump came across as energetic and forceful, while Biden’s performance drew intense criticism for appearing uneven and hard to follow.
That contrast mattered because debates are not just about policy details. They also shape confidence, and in this case the event seemed to reinforce existing concerns about Biden’s age and stamina while giving Trump room to dominate the tone of the night.
Why Biden’s Performance Drew So Much Attention
Much of the post-debate conversation centered on Biden’s delivery. Analysts said the issue was not just a missed opportunity, but a moment that deepened doubts about whether he was ready to carry the campaign through another full season of pressure and scrutiny.
When a candidate struggles to communicate clearly on a national stage, the impact goes beyond one bad night. It affects fundraising, media coverage, party confidence, and how voters assess leadership at the top of the ticket.
Trump’s Advantage on Stage
Trump did not give a flawless performance, but he seemed more comfortable in the debate setting. He used his strengths - aggression, interruption, and message control - to keep the spotlight on Biden’s weaknesses rather than on his own policy record.
That made the debate feel less like a policy exchange and more like a political stress test. In the eyes of many viewers, Trump did enough to look stronger, even while critics noted his own false claims and interruptions.
What the Debate Changed
The biggest impact of the debate was not a single answer or attack line. It was the way the evening reshaped public discussion about the race itself, especially Biden’s future and Trump’s ability to capitalize on weakness in the Democratic ticket.
For election watchers, the debate became a turning point because it confirmed that 2024 would not just be about policy contrast. It would also be about competence, energy, and which candidate could convince voters they were fit for the pressure of the presidency.
Watch the Episode
You can watch the full episode here: The Not So Great Debate Debacle | Trump vs. Biden. npr
If this was worth your time, The Dispatch is worth your inbox. Subscribers get the stories that matter every morning - before the rest of the internet catches up. It's free.
Subscribe to The Dispatch → https://georgemagazine.com/thedispatch/
J.D. Vance, Trump’s Surprise VP Pick: Could Vance Cost Trump the Election?
Donald Trump’s decision to choose J.D. Vance as his running mate was one of the most talked-about moves of the 2024 campaign. The pick gave Trump a younger, more ideological, and deeply loyal vice-presidential partner - but it also raised a serious question: could Vance help energize the base while potentially turning off swing voters?
Why Trump Chose Vance
Trump’s selection of Vance was unusual by traditional vice-presidential standards. Analysts noted that Vance was not picked mainly for geographic balance or to expand the map in a conventional way, but for his loyalty, his populist messaging, and his ability to reinforce Trump’s political direction. Reports also highlighted Vance’s rise from Trump critic to staunch ally, which made him an especially symbolic choice for a campaign built on personal loyalty and movement politics.
Vance’s background gave Trump a narrative advantage too. He came from a working-class Ohio upbringing, served in the military, became a bestselling author, and later entered politics as a voice for the Rust Belt and blue-collar voters. For Trump, that story fits neatly into the broader message of economic nationalism and “America First” populism.
The Risk Factor
The concern, however, is that Vance may be more effective at energizing the MAGA base than persuading undecided voters. Some analysts argued that he does not add many new supporters to the ticket because most people who like Vance already planned to vote for Trump anyway. Others pointed out that Vance’s strong positions on immigration, abortion, and foreign policy could deepen divisions with moderate Republicans and independents.
That is where the real question comes in: in a close election, can a vice-presidential pick become a liability if it hardens opposition without broadening appeal? Polling and political analysis at the time suggested Vance was unlikely to dramatically shift the race, but his presence could still matter at the margins, especially in battleground states.
Vance and the Bigger Republican Shift
Vance’s rise also reflects a larger transformation inside the Republican Party. His selection signaled that Trump was not simply choosing a running mate - he was shaping the future of the party around a more populist, loyalist, and hard-edged version of conservatism. That made Vance important not only for 2024, but also for the party’s direction beyond the election.
In that sense, the vice-presidential pick became more than a campaign decision. It became a statement about what kind of Republican Party Trump wants to leave behind. Whether that helps him win or creates fresh vulnerabilities depends on how voters respond to the message Vance represents.
Why This Story Matters
The J.D. Vance pick is a powerful example of how vice-presidential choices can shape political narratives even if they do not drastically change polling numbers. It forces voters to think about loyalty, ideology, electability, and the future of the Republican movement all at once. For political readers, it is not just about one candidate - it is about the direction of the entire ticket.
Watch the full episode on American Pulse TV: J.D. Vance, Trump’s Surprise VP Pick: Could Vance Cost Trump the Election? npr
If this was worth your time, The Dispatch is worth your inbox. Subscribers get the stories that matter every morning - before the rest of the internet catches up. It's free.
Subscribe to The Dispatch → https://georgemagazine.com/thedispatch/
who did jeff and liu vote for?
After much deliberation, Jeff the Killer cast his ballot in favor of Cornell West. Many told him that a vote away from Mz Harris was a vote for Trump—-but Jeffrey could not in good conscience vote for Kamala with everything she supported!
As Jeffrey and I reside in a largely Democratic area, he knew we would not risk tipping the electoral college in favor of the Republicans. So he slipped that ballot in2 the box and walked proudly away! He knew, logically, that Mr West would not win—-not in a corrupt two-party system such as this. But maybe, just maybe, if everyone thought like Jeff—-if everyone voted with hope in their hearts and a gleam in their eyes—-there would be millions more casting their ballot in favor of candidates committed 2 real change.
(2 be clear, this was a decision I heavily collaborated with Jeffrey on, as he was essentially “voting for two.” This was back before he betrayed our soul bond and while I do not support Jeff the Kilelr anymore I still support this decision).
And Homicidal Liu? Well, let’s just say their ADHD got the better of them…
i really can’t get over how for decades america has had old white man presidents and people were like “we want a younger, not white, maybe even female candidate” and then a younger, black woman ran for president and they spit in her face and said “fuck you”
