#3rd party sharing

[moon-fence]

hello! just a small update, the requests are closed now :)

i have all your requests planned out in my head, im just pretty busy because of school work. i will work on them when i have free time!

also another thing, if you are going to reblog one of my edits please disable 3rd party sharing from your blogs, i dont want my work to be used in ai training. thank you :)

[thediktatortot]

Does turning off 3rd party sharing even matter when you cannot remove reblogs of your post to other people's accounts who DON"T have their 3rd party sharing turned off?

[syunkiss]

Wtf is "3rd party sharing"

[discoveryesq]

3rd Parties Break Privilege

Even & Especially Lawyers

Lawyers for 2 different sides negotiate a contract via back & forth emails. Each side makes comments & proposed changes on the drafts.

The MANY different versions of drafts.

Are the drafts protected by privilege?

2 scenarios:

The other side / opposing counsel sent the drafts - Not privileged

During a back and forth negotiation, except in rare situations, opposing counsel’s presence in a correspondence constitutes a 3rd party that breaks privilege.

2. The other side sent their most recent draft which was subsequently distributed internally between company attorneys who added their comments to that draft; the draft was kept company confidential - Privileged or Partially privileged

This draft would be protected by privilege or the internal comments from attorneys would at least get redacted before the draft could be produced. Legal work, review, advice, etc on a draft from the other side is protected by privilege, even if the draft itself (without the lawyers’ comments) is not protected by privilege anymore.

Related situations:

Email correspondence attaching the same drafts:

If the email includes opposing counsel: Not privileged

If the email is shared internally with attorneys and kept company confidential : Privileged

[xmascritter]

I have woken up to Crazy Redd (tumblr 3rd parties) having broken all the protective glass around the art in the museum (my blog), with Tom Nook (tumblr staff) walking in as I try to figure out which if any art was stolen, offering to upgrade my security system to keep Redd out after he let him move onto the fucking island.

Theft is his whole career. You knew you would do this. And yet you let him wander freely and basically offer me the free version of a protection racket, a promise that this DEFINITELY won't happen again.

Yeah, I really believe you will keep your word Tom Nook. 🙄 and you wonder why your reputation is repeatedly dragged through the mud by your own consumers.

[leeknowpegger]

MPREGGGGG

MEN BEING PREGNANT YAOI SPLATS MEN WADDLING AROUND MEN GIVING BIRTH

[thedarkwanderer]

Half a year of research for my dissertation on Facebook privacy seems to reflect yesterday's FTC decision on Facebook privacy and 3rd party sharing of users' private data. If I had to start again, would I claim that Facebook is the new Panoptikon? I think I would.

The effects of the settlement will likely have more to do with other social networks than the original one. The message from the FTC to social media is now clear: if you put the desires of advertisers before the privacy of users, you will be stopped. Just because you’re sitting on a ton of personal information that would make marketers drool, it doesn’t mean you can monetize it in any way you like.