The challenge for Week 11 of 52 Weeks of Awesomeness is “Small vs Large Depth of Field”. Small Depth of Field (1st photo) vs Large Depth of Field (2nd photo) 135mm | ISO 50 | f/2.0 | 1/400 | vs 135mm | ISO 5000 | f/32.0 | 1/100 | My parents have been in town for a little over a week and it has been awesome watching them interact with Paxton. The last time they visited, Paxton was only 3 weeks old. It is unreal how much he’s grown since then! I figured they would be perfect models to help me showcase Depth of Field and our beautiful desert landscape. Thankfully, they were incredibly willing (just part of why they are so amazing) to help me! I love how much my parents love my son! My photography is almost solely based on small depth of field. I love presenting my subjects in a way that separates them from their background. For the first image, I shot at my maximum aperture of f/32. Honestly, I’ve never shot anything at f/32. You can see how flat that image is because so much of it is in focus. The second image is how I shoot most. The aperture set at f/2 causes the background to be dramatically blurred, called bokeh. Though the light changed in the few seconds after the first photo, I think you can still see the difference in depth of field! I shoot this way because with wedding/event photography, sometimes you don’t have time to go to the most beautiful locations and so by shooting with a small DoF, I can minimize the location and focus more on my clients’ relationship. The challenge for Week 12 of 52 Weeks of Awesomeness is “Loss”! Excited to find your submissions via #52WoA on social media! #LaBrisaPhotography #PreserveRelationships #52WeeksOfAwesomeness #WeeklyPhotoChallenge (at La Brisa Photography)
















