#a2j

[programminglibrarian]

How to find a passion project?

I need something fresh on GitHub so that prospective employers can see that I can actually code. I've been somewhat hamstrung finding a real world problem that I can reasonably address with a toy-sized project. Here's one go:

Problem: News articles on court matters are written in plain language and rarely include case citations, jurisdictions, or generally enough information to look further into the matter they're reporting on. With so much misinformation circulating via social media, it's increasingly important for people to verify stories they find online before sharing them further.

Caveat: Lately (some) news organizations has become better about uploading CourtListener documents from the matter they're reporting on in the cloud and embedding them in the news article.

Potential solution: A UI that helps the user identify the relevant info in the article, zeroing in on info that could help determine jurisdiction, party names, etc. Then find the documents using CourtListener API if it's a jurisdiction that is included. Forwards the user to info about access to that jurisdiction's materials if not. May need to integrate a map.

Obstacles: I research like a librarian. I like advanced search forms that let me narrow parameters, but most people just want a single search box so they don't have to think.

Can I just target this for other people who want to do careful research and include some kind of "simple search" link that kicks them over to the CourtListener search page?

[programminglibrarian]

What are we even here for...

Last week, another software developer said to me that the hard truth of our industry is that we're here to eliminate jobs.

Dude, some of us are here just trying to get information out to the people. Building maps to make complex forest fire data easier to interpret. Building access to justice chatbots and legal aid portals. There's work to be done getting public information out to the people and helping the people navigate complex systems to make their lives easier. 🤘🏻✊🏻

[randombusinessoflawthoughts]

Future of Law Thought - 11.10.2022 (A2J)

Future of Law Thought – 11.10.2022 (A2J)

More people have access to the internet than have access to a lawyer Richard Suskind

View On WordPress

[bcdisabilitycaucus]

Image text: Justice must be accessible to all Canadians, not just  those who can afford it and don’t need accommodation Disabled Canadians need effective access to justice on an equal basis with others Disabled Canadians are less likely to have the resources to fight back against those who have power. The quote below is from a former politician who knew this and routinely dismissed disabled persons’ needs. It’s telling regarding how their access to justice is essential. ”I think sometimes government is made aware of situations when lawsuits are brought forward. It makes you think more critically about what you can do and how you can (offer) support.”  - Michelle Stilwell, former Minister of Social Development and Social Innovation, BC Liberals, July 2016   What will your party do to ensure disabled Canadians have effective access to justice?   Federal Election 2021 Image text: Scales of justice favouring those with power and money

[rpbp]

Here’s the audio for a tremendous episode of TalkPoverty, where I had the pleasure of joining Sharon Dietrich, the litigation director of Community Legal Services in Philadelphia, and Rebecca Vallas, host of TalkPoverty, to discuss the state of access to justice for marginalized Americans. 

Follow the jump for that and updates on protests over the Dakota Access Pipeline with Mary Kathryn Nagle, an attorney and a citizen of the Cherokee Nation, as well as a discussion of the part played by big donors in advancing agendas that don’t always benefit Americans of modest means with David Callahan, founder and editor of Inside Philanthropy. 

[rpbp]

Access to justice is now more critical than ever. In the United States, Americans need a lawyer’s help for everything from avoiding an unjust eviction to preventing a wrongful conviction. Yet, effective legal assistance remains out of reach for the majority of Americans. The gap between legal needs and the services available exacerbates systemic inequities and disadvantages that will only grow over the next four years. This series examines the state of access to justice in the United States and how public and private actors can join forces to make justice equal for all Americans.

[talkjustice]

Access to Justice Week: Kym

Kym Sweeny is a third-year student at the Schulich School of Law at Dalhousie University. She is currently the Executive Director of the Dalhousie Student Advocacy Service at the Dalhousie Student Union. Kym is a single mother to her six-year-year old son and two dogs.

Note: This story does not take place in Nova Scotia but its themes are relevant across provinces, and it speaks to the need for change in each province.

When she was 20 years old and a full-time university student, Kym found out she was pregnant. Under the circumstances in which her pregnancy occurred, she wanted to ensure that the father would not have access to her or her child, among other conditions. Kym qualified for a legal aid certificate and went to seek out a lawyer who could help her navigate the family law system. 

At the time in Ontario, the legal aid system was certificate based, with private practices taking on legal aid clients with certificates. Lawyers who represented legal aid clients were paid $60/hour, much lower than normal rates. They were also limited in the number of hours they were allowed to work on the case, putting legal aid clients at a significant disadvantage. Given these restraints, lawyers might not be able to devote the necessary amount of time to a case. Being a broke student, Kym had no other option but to use the certificate.

She wanted to be completely prepped for court once her child was born, so she looked to retain a lawyer while she was still pregnant. She called around and one firm agreed to take her on. Her lawyer was a man in his fifties and throughout their entire first conversation, he seemed apathetic, uninterested and bored. Nonetheless, Kym explained her situation, as well as what she hoped to achieve by going to court. 

Right away, her lawyer was dismissive toward her requests. He told her she wasn't going to get what she wanted, asked her to compromise on quite a few of her wishes, and offered little reasoning and no alternative solutions. He did all this without showing a single ounce of compassion for her or her situation. Kym remembers starting to cry in the lawyer's office and eventually asking him how he could say such callous things. His reply: "Well, you're not my family."

After that experience, Kym decided if she was going to be adequately prepared, she would have to do her own research. She began combing through legal texts and reading through court decisions. She took precautions following her research. For example, she moved out of her city to a town three hours away, so her child would be born there and couldn’t be ordered back to the father's city of residence. As a law student now, Kym looks back and realizes just how uninformed she was on every aspect of legal research. But as an undergraduate student without any legal training, it was the best she could do.

Kym's case went to court after her son was born. Her lawyer gave her no information on what to expect and Kym still remembers shaking in fear while in the courtroom, waiting to begin. However, the judge was a woman – and she was compassionate. The judge interrupted the lawyer to ask Kym direct questions about her circumstances and what she actually wanted out of the case. 

Upon fully understanding Kym's situation, the judge then proceeded, in a roundabout way, to give her the court order she was hoping for. Kym recalls the judge saying things like "I think what your counsel meant to ask for was …" and "I'm sure your counsel meant to include …" while crafting a court order that has allowed Kym and her son the autonomy she wanted. She can still picture the big, empty hallway as she walked out of that courtroom, crying with happiness and relief.

Kym feels that having a female judge made all the difference to the case and ultimately, to her and her son. Sometimes she thinks about how their lives could be drastically different if there had not been a woman presiding that day. 

[talkjustice]

Access to Justice Week: Jessica

Jessica Dempsey is in her third year of a management degree at Dalhousie University. She is a transgender rights advocate and an advocate for people with permanent disabilities. She also holds a B.A. in sociology and hopes to continue on to law school.

Jessica's experience with the justice system lies mostly in the realm of human rights. After facing discrimination at Dalhousie University for being a trans woman, Jessica filed a complaint with the Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission (NSHRC). Even though NSHRC uses a restorative dispute resolution process, based upon the principles of restorative, rather than punitive justice, Jessica felt the system was still inherently biased toward those who held power. 

It was a struggle to find legal representation that would take her case. She called virtually every law firm in the Halifax area, but each declined to take her case because she did not have sufficient funds. Many firms never returned her calls, and the ones that did were dismissive of her case. In the end, she represented herself and had to do all the research normally done by professionals with extensive legal training – all while still in school. 

Jessica found the human rights complaints resolution process to be un-transparent and inaccessible. She felt disempowered by the legal might of the organizations she complained against, as if the system was not structured to account for the power discrepancies that arise out of human rights violations. To top it all off, the NSHRC included her male name in her case's paperwork, which she calls a clear example of contributing to systemic transphobia.

Jessica felt the NSHRC process and final decision to deny an investigation into her complaint were not fair or even adequate: the NSHRC Commissioner meetings were closed, with no reasoning given for a decision. As such, Jessica applied for judicial review of NSHRC's decision with the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia. At the Supreme Court, she felt as if she was finally heard. 

In contrast to the NSHRC, where she felt discriminated against and disempowered, Jessica described her experience at the Supreme Court as quite the opposite, with a fair judge and transparent process. For Jessica, the chance to present her case in a courtroom, with time and space to air her frustrations to an attentive judge, was incredibly empowering. Although the judge ultimately dismissed her application, Jessica was able to tell her story. The judge listened to her and carefully considered her version of events, and that was the major difference between the two experiences. One treated her as a person, the other as less than one.