Sivagami, ABCDE redux meme (feel free to send me some asks too!)
Two answers! (Because @ratnananda asked for Sivagami, as well as many other awesome prompts as well, which should follow)
A) A wish they would make on the Monkey’s Paw, and the consequences
Sivagami wishes, resentful and indignant, that the Princess of Kuntala had never come to Mahishmati, had never met Baahu or Bhalla, had never been born at all--and, with the snap of a malicious god’s fingers, it is so.
At first Sivagami rests easy, confident that without Devasena’s malicious influence, her family will not fall apart this time. But to her horror, it begins anew; Bhalla’s smiles grow more forced, and Baahu, even without his wife’s example, grows more and more bent on breaking tradition when it clashes with the greater dharma. What’s worse, Bhalla’s anger, now that it cannot be directed at Devasena, manifests itself more directly at his mother; and Baahu, though he tries to conceal it, always appears somehow lonely and unsatisfied, even his kind heart growing cold and empty. It ends with Bhalla raising his army in rebellion, and Baahu ordering his brother’s execution, despite Sivagami’s protests.
That is your curse, says the voice of the god, it will always end such, with one of your son’s blood on his brother’s hands. Choose which it shall be.
Her voice breaks in a sob; she cannot answer in words. But the next morning, when she wakes, the Princess of Kuntala is back at her husband’s side, and Sivagami knows what Mahishmati’s fate will be.
B) Two things the history books get wrong about them
1) One of the most vicious debates held by historians of early modern Mahishmati, is the origin of the invocation of “Sivagami” in the traditional oath made by the monarch. There are some who claim this is nothing more than another name for the goddess of the kingdom; but certainly no other evidence points to any particular goddess-worship in the region otherwise. The only historical precedent appears to be the shadowy reign of the regent Sivagami, between the rule of Kings Vikramadeva and Bhallaladeva; but this is contested by poor documentation of her lineage and the fact that the change to the oath was not made during the reign of her son Bhallaladeva. Certainly if it originated from her efforts in service to the throne, a true-born son would be the first to adopt such a valorization of his mother.
2) Another historical controversy centers around the identity of female skeleton 38SD, found on the riverbank. There are some who suggest this was part of a ritual burial, due to the rich jewels and fibers of silk with which she was discovered, despite poor historical evidence that this was a rite favored by early Mahishmatians; and others who, pointing to the signs of trauma to the back, favor the theory that this was instead human sacrifice, despite this being more associated with the Kalakeya tribe, found elsewhere in the country. Regardless, since her discovery, skeleton 38SD has excited popular interest; and her burial on the Baahubali estate, thanks to the efforts on the part of that family to treat the nameless skeleton with decency and respect, was televised and watched by millions…..















