#adam kramer

[witch0000]

Photo by Adam Kramer

[ebizworldwide]

Facebook: When Trust Is Exploited

In 2014, Facebook came under attack after a research study was published disclosing that the social network was studying on some individuals that utilize its system. It was not only awful the means in which Facebook conducted the study, however the assumptions the scientists made regarding the ordinary customer"s willingness to be emotionally manipulated were chilling.

In the study, "Speculative Evidence Of Massive-Scale Emotional Contamination Via Social Networks", researchers Adam Kramer, Jamie Guillory and Jeffrey Hancock controlled the information feeds of nearly 700,000 Facebook customers. The objective was to see if adjusting news feeds could bring about what the scientists described "psychological contagion." Looter alert: the answer is yes.

The depend on problems below are big and factor to the importance for we all, all the time, to check out those pesky Service and Information Usage Plans many web services toss on the display with an "I check out as well as allow the terms of this agreement" switch on the first web page of exactly what is accurately going to be a lengthy document.

From a workplace perspective the issue is similarly laden. It"s typical plan now for employers making employment set after the prospect signing a selection of papers, including intellectual residential property tasks, social-media usage agreements and also non-compete agreements. There"s hardly any rely on the job world. Nonetheless, it is essential for employers to set up an employment community where depend on is an assisting principle as well as a common responsibility.

One area where trust between companies and staff members has actually noticeably frayed is in using personal digital tools mobile phone, laptops as well as tablets, amongst various other gizmos made use of in the office. For a little firm it may not be an issue but lots of large, public and also financial services business either do not permit employees to bring their very own tools or make workers sign agreements to put protection software on the tool, accept certain patterns of usage and also allow the firm not to check worker information and rub the tool. A study by Harris Interactive (sponsored by Webroot) had a variety of appealing findings about the "bring your very own device" policy, and its influences on depend on. Three data points from journalism release announcing the survey results deserve duplicating, the initial 2 from a staff member perspective as well as the third from an employer"s perspective (these are taken verbatim from the release):

Nearly fifty percent say they would certainly stop utilizing their tool(s) for work altogether if business plan needed that they mount a security app on personal devices utilized for work purposes

Employers being able to accessibility staff members" individual information became the leading worry, with a bulk defining themselves as either incredibly worried or really worried regarding this

73 percent concur that employees must have some impact on software or security set up on individual tools utilized for job. The record is appealing, as is the infographic, as well as well worth a look.

I"ve asserted below that trust is necessary, and additionally a key part of influence. Others maintain that influence is unneeded if there is a solid structure of depend on. I"m not convinced. In my job with staff members, prospects and employers, I see depend on and impact as having a mutual and regularly evolving relationship. Therefore it is important for employers to treat their employees as trusted companions in the venture. And it is important for workers to be trustworthy and also honest, to keep the company"s trust.

On a practical level this is significantly difficult. Companies are not always trustworthy or ethical (Enron any person?), nor are individual employees (, Edward Snowden?). Depend on is, then, a job in progress, something that calls for an everyday investment from all celebrations. Just how do you create that link? By developing a workplace society that demands, as well as incentives, trust. Can this be finished with social media tools? Maybe.

Many work environments don"t have a real-time "feed" of information and also sentiment from all employees. Some could utilize wikis, blog sites or business software program apps such as Yammer. Even those organizations with robust Intranets, wikis and also Yammer may not have the social listening abilities needed to view the flow of information and also interpret it correctly without breaking the trust in or misinterpreting the intent of the individuals. One close friend, for instance, benefited a large multi-national company that made use of Yammer in an effort to construct a society of count on as well as interaction. The company had actually confirmed itself untrustworthy in various other ways, as well as few participated.

Trust can be breached early, usually and in some cases both. As soon as the break occurs it"s difficult to repair. I would certainly suggest do not turn to social-media tools initially to develop trust in the office. Begin by developing relationships, demanding credibility as well as acting swiftly to avoid problems that can wear down trust.

As a leader in your firm, allow your employees know you trust them by offering them duty. This is the foundation of a society of trust in. As well as if you are a worker, job daily to recognize that commitment to you and also earn count on over again. If you are lucky adequate to function within a workplace society of trust, do everything possible to improve that foundation.

Facebook: When Trust Is Exploited http://ebizworldwide.blogspot.com/2016/05/blog-post_4.html

[observatoriorh]

Nuestro corazón late en las redes sociales

Nuestro corazón late en las redes sociales

Autores: Adam Kramer, Jamie Guillory y Jeffrey T. Hancock (2012).

Facebook tiene alrededor de 1320 millones de usuarios registrados alrededor de todo el mundo. La página es la más popular para subir fotografías, con estadísticas de más de 83 millones de fotos subidas a diario. El 3 de noviembre del 2007, había siete mil aplicaciones en el sitio, cien agregadas cada día y en enero de 2010…

View On WordPress

[blondetwist]

Does Consent apply to Facebook?

Everyone has heard about #Facebooks secret study by now. The question is - does concent apply to them?

Facebook has violated your privacy.

Well, okay – that’s nothing new. Facebook and its on again off again relationship with your personal details is a rocky road that always seems to be just on this side not okay. That is not news.

This – this is something different. And this, is HUGE. 

Facebooks Covert experiment

Unless you’ve spent the last few days under a rock (or under a beer and a Barbeque,…

View On WordPress

[cybermambi]

Facebook no solo vende información de sus usuarios, también experimenta con ellos

Facebook no solo vende información de sus usuarios, también experimenta con ellos

Facebook se coloca otra vez en el ojo de la tormenta en el mundo de la tecnología. La mayor red social del mundo reconoció que en enero de 2012 utilizó los perfiles de más de medio millón de personas para llevar a cabo un experimento científico sobre su influencia en el estado anímico de los usuarios.

En mayo de ese año, cuatro meses después de realizar este experimento, el servicio creado por…

View On WordPress

[dcvitti]

Facebook é criticado por estudo secreto sobre emoções

Facebook é criticado por estudo secreto sobre emoções #blogdodcvitti

Há pouco mais de uma semana, o Diário da Saúde foi o único veículo nacional a divulgar uma pesquisa que mostrou a manipulação de notícias mostradas a centenas de milhares de usuários do Facebook.

Durante o estudo, coordenado por Adam Kramer, funcionário do Facebook, em parceira com cientistas das universidades norte-americanas de Cornell e da Califórnia, o Facebook manipulou o feed de notícias

View On WordPress

[priceofliberty]

The reason we did this research is because we care about the emotional impact of Facebook and the people that use our product. We felt that it was important to investigate the common worry that seeing friends post positive content leads to people feeling negative or left out. At the same time, we were concerned that exposure to friends' negativity might lead people to avoid visiting Facebook. We didn't clearly state our motivations in the paper.

No, Adam D. I. Kramer, you're just backpedaling.

From the actual abstract of the paper:

Emotional states can be transferred to others via emotional contagion, leading people to experience the same emotions without their awareness. Emotional contagion is well established in laboratory experiments, with people transferring positive and negative emotions to others.

In an experiment with people who use Facebook, we test whether emotional contagion occurs outside of in-person interaction between individuals by reducing the amount of emotional content in the News Feed. When positive expressions were reduced, people produced fewer positive posts and more negative posts; when negative expressions were reduced, the opposite pattern occurred. These results indicate that emotions expressed by others on Facebook influence our own emotions, constituting experimental evidence for massive-scale contagion via social networks.

[algopop]

Facebook's massive-scale emotional contagion experiment

Facebook researchers have published a paper documenting a huge social experiment carried out on 689,003 users without their knowledge. The experiment was to prove that emotional states can be transferred to others via emotional contagion. They proved this by manipulating different user's newsfeed to be more positive or more negative and then measuring the emotional state of the user afterwards by analysing their subsequent status updates.

we test whether emotional contagion occurs outside of in-person interaction between individuals by reducing the amount of emotional content in the News Feed. When positive expressions were reduced, people produced fewer positive posts and more negative posts; when negative expressions were reduced, the opposite pattern occurred.  

They demonstrate how influential the newsfeed algorithm can be in manipulating a person's mood, and even test tweaking the algorithm to deliver more emotional content with hope that it would be more engaging. 

The experiments took place for one week (January 11–18, 2012), and the  'participants' were randomly selected based on their User ID. In total, over 3 million status updates were analysed. The lead researcher was Adam Kramer, [email protected]