You can’t plan for a life-threatening medical emergency. But depending on where you live and if you’re pregnant, the tiny bit of control you
"if you live in any of the nine states that automatically toss out a pregnant person’s advance directive:
Alabama
Indiana
Kansas
Michigan
Missouri
South Carolina
Texas
Utah
Wisconsin
But that’s not the complete story. A 2019 study published in JAMA examined the way all states navigated pregnancy and advance directives and found that 39 states “identified pregnancy as a condition that influences either an incapacitated [patient’s] advance directive or surrogate decision making.”
They also noted some of the nuances that vary between states: which states test for pregnancy before they allow someone to be taken off life support (Alaska, Georgia and Oklahoma); the five states (Kentucky, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, and South Dakota) that “specified that life-sustaining therapies may be discontinued if they cause the woman undue pain that cannot be alleviated by medication” and the lone state (Pennsylvania) that offers to take on the financial burden of keeping a pregnant person on life support in these situations.
Yet, among these states, the actual laws are hardly public knowledge — only eight of the states’ advance directive documents seek someone’s “pregnancy-specific care preferences.” Of the 31 states that had restrictions on taking pregnant people off life support, 29 of these states have restrictions in their state statutes. However, 69% of the advance directive forms from these states made no mention of them."
...
Ultimately, it comes back to a prevailing narrative that reproductive health care experts and advocates have been urging more Americans to consider: These sort of restrictive laws, pieced together by people with little knowledge of medicine or pregnant bodies cannot fairly legislate around the unique medical needs of pregnant people and the health care providers who care for them."




















