Do not use AI for your writing.
We can tell.
Just, don't do it.
Just write.
If it is cringe, it is cringe.
If it is good, it is good.
If no one likes it? Oh well.
Just don't use AI.

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Italy

seen from France

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Egypt
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from Austria
seen from Japan
seen from China
seen from Russia
seen from Switzerland
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Germany
Do not use AI for your writing.
We can tell.
Just, don't do it.
Just write.
If it is cringe, it is cringe.
If it is good, it is good.
If no one likes it? Oh well.
Just don't use AI.
I am suspicious of you using AI to write your fics...
I am wholeheartedly, passionately against the use of ai in any way, shape or form. it is an insult to intellectualism, to creativity and to humanity itself.
I am a student in paris who studies mainly fashion, music aswell as many other forms of art—basically, I am an artistic person and i love art to my core. i believe its an extension of one's personality, thoughts, desires... whatever, it's inheritely human. and it's meant to stay human.
using ai to generate art, lyrics, poetry, to write fanfic etc should be considered a crime against humanity because we as humans have always given eachother messages through heartfelt, handmade stuff
we have always written letters, composed songs, painted pictures, made up stories... it has always been part of our culture and it has been that way since the dawn of time—the very beginning of humanity. literal cavemen would use natural pigments to paint on walls!!!
using artificial intelligence to generate something that is devoided of soul and meaning is something I would never allow myself to even think of. I am firmly against chatgpt, bing, grok, c.ai, chai, etc...
I think it's disgusting and weird and shut up if you say "it makes art accessible" because art HAS ALWAYS been accessible u stupid jerk
The studi says that replacing human artists with AI will save “millions and millions of dollars.”
Well, that sounds like a well considered and artistically motivated decision, and not at all like the definition of soul-less cash grab.
The sad thing about AI is that it's stolen my appreciation of art. Instead of looking at something and admiring the talent of the artist, I'm now looking for tells.
Sometimes I don't have time for this, so ignore it and move on.
Pity. There's so many great artists that I once would've loved but now ignore, because I don't have time to sift though the chaff of stupid prompts that are stolen, souless, corruptions of a once beautiful world.
Thank you to the artists I know are real. You have given me a path to find other real artists.
there goes my favorite drawing software ...
i defended their plans for the version2 and all, bc i didnt see much wrong with it and liked csp alot, but i guess i should have become a hater back then already
after that one big mistake that sparked so much outrage they really said but how can we actually lose EVERYONE, they saw deviantart doing it and thought BET I CAN DO IT FASTER
(they say they dont use user data but are basing it on stable diffusion of all things, they literally only ask people to think morally/ethically when using it to not use stolen stuff like thats ever worked with anything ever, plus "we cant guarantee that there will be no copyright infringement" OH YOU DONT SAY)
Generative AI’s gifts come with a hidden danger: decay in the accuracy and quality of organizational knowledge. This decay is the organizati
Harvard Business Review now joining the chorus saying businesses need to restrict generative AI use to where it genuinely helps or both trust and expertise get lost and productivity crashes.
AI muscle fantasy
I sat down and read AI fics so you don't have to...
So I got curious about how difficult it would be to tell apart AI writing compared to regular fics, and I've seen people be concerned about how to distinguish the two. So I read some fics across multiple fandoms, with different lenghts, popularity and ratings.
Here are my main take aways:
Continuity and logic: AI is terrible at remembering what it has already told you and make it make sense with what's to come. Many examples of X said this in the first paragraph, and then further down the line it was suddenly Y who said or did the thing. The longer the story gets or the more characters it contains the worse this problem becomes.
Physical placement: Suddenly people are in a different room, not as close to the thing or closer to each other than previously described. Are they holding a cup or not? Where the heck did their hands suddenly go? who knows. The robot has glowing eyes when everyone in the fandom knows it ain't the eyes that glow on robots in this fandom🙃
The mood: Wtf on this one. The moods are so strange and there is a severe case of telling instead of showing. I've read some that were clearly prompted to give a certain mood which meant that it was mentioned at times that just didn't fit. Like "there was tension in the air between them" when absolute zero things have happened to create this tension. Or quick shift from comfortable -> tense -> comfortable in one paragraph. Yikes.
Generalizations: AI uses whatever it can find to fill in the gaps. Example: if you're writing about someone in a certain profession it will just grab whatever it might have picked up about said profession and fill in wherever it can. So you end up with strange descriptions that might fit a stereotypical person from that career, but certainly not this particular character. Makes for some real out of character descriptions.
Conversation: The individual lines might make sense, but the overall conversation doesn't necessarily make a lot of sense. Or the things they say are so vague and unspecific that it's meaningless. Think "I'm 13 and this is deep" kinda things. I also saw plenty of cases of a child/teen/college student would not talk like that.
Word choice: You know how some authors use different words than what you might expect, but it just works? Gives a funny, quirky or heartfelt vibe? AI does basicly the opposite. The word choice in many of these fics made me stop and reread multiple paragraphs because it really didn't suit the setting. You would think it would be easy to make it pick the right choice between formal and informal language, but if it also needs to fullfill other criteria simultaneously it gets messy. If it's a subject that is usually talked about in a formal tone, but in this case shouldn't be... the poor thing can get confused.
Repetition: This one surprised me, but I'm pretty sure it happens from poor prompting that doesn't have enough info to go on. So damn many repetitions of the same word or almost same phrase popped up in many of them. I know we're already telling nothing with these stories, but come on how many times to we hear about the lamp on the shelf?
Pacing: Either too fast and skipping parts in a way that doesn't make sense (see above logic problems) or sloooow where it really shouldn't be (see above repetition issues). Makes for an overall either confusing or very boring reading experience depending on which direction it went in.
-
To avoid all of these mistakes, you have to be a somewhat decent writer to start with. So if you think "I'm a bad writer AI will be able to fix it for me" - Yeah, no. It can help with grammar, but it cannot write a compelling story as it is now.
The worst part was that some of these stories were based on ideas that I would like to read about. But the AI execution completely killed the story.